Do our strengths come from our dark side?


Reply
  • Page 1 of 2
  • 1
  • 2
 
Topic Tools Search this Thread
Diana_P is offline Diana_P Post #1  October 16,2011, 9:21am
Diana_P's Avatar

Board Leader - Religion & Spirituality

Joined: Sep 2010

Posts: 1,118

See profile

There was an episode of Star Trek the original series where Captain Kirk is split into two beings by a transporter accident. One is aggressive, decisive, and masculine, but selfish and lacks compassion. The other is intelligent, logical, analytical, and kind, but is soft, feminine, indecisive, and having real trouble commanding the Starship. This episode was filmed in the 60’s so keep in mind that the Star Trek Universe at that time had no female Captains or Commanders.

As the episode progressed Captain Kirk gradually lost his ability to lead in spite of being reminded that command is a function of the intellect. Instead, the episode seemed to imply that most of our strengths are indeed derived from our dark side and we as human beings can not function without it.

Do you agree? Must we access our darker emotions to make those hard decisions? Do we need more than compassion and intellect to be effective as a human being? Is the need to access our dark side more critical if we choose to be a leader?

Thanks and let the discussion begin.
 
  Reply With Quote
Xable is offline Xable Post #2  October 16,2011, 10:31am
Xable's Avatar

gives up.

Virtuoso

Joined: Mar 2010

Texas

Posts: 2,607

See profile

Between good/bad, light/dark, I find being bad infinitely easier. I don't think it takes any strength (however you might define strength) to do things which you would associate more with the dark side.

In fact, the hardest things I have ever had to do in life have been what I felt was the "right"thing to do. It would have been so much more easier do cave in and do what I knew wasn't the "right" thing.

But, if we are going to get really philosophical, I hazard that being either good or bad is a function of what we are more comfortable with and use to.

To me, I don't blink an eye at being honest and telling people the truth because it never even occurs to me that things might be easier for me to tell a lie.

However, I have met some people who are so use to lying that they lie without even having a need too. It is so much their nature, it is what they are use to, that causes them to turn to lying over telling the truth.

Which leads me to believe, whatever you are most use to is what is going to be easier for you. I don't think it is a matter of needing one or the other to function. I think it is a matter of functioning based on what parameters you are more familiar with.
 
  Reply With Quote
Diana_P is offline Diana_P Post #3  October 16,2011, 10:57am
Diana_P's Avatar

Board Leader - Religion & Spirituality

Joined: Sep 2010

Posts: 1,118

See profile

Xable wrote :
But, if we are going to get really philosophical, I hazard that being either good or bad is a function of what we are more comfortable with and use to.

Which leads me to believe, whatever you are most use to is what is going to be easier for you. I don't think it is a matter of needing one or the other to function. I think it is a matter of functioning based on what parameters you are more familiar with.
That is fascinating. I’ve never looked at it that way before but I can certainly see the logic in it.
 
  Reply With Quote
Reverse_Dragon is offline Reverse_Dragon Post #4  October 16,2011, 6:16pm
Reverse_Drago…'s Avatar

w00t w00t! I is getting married! Success at last.

Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 2011

Louisville, KY

Posts: 693

See profile

I think the darker sides of our selves can be invaluable, provided they are guided by reason and moderated by ethics. Righteous anger is a terrible and awesome thing to behold, and it has a place in the lives of enlightened humans. So too for deceit, jealousy, and fear. We have these feelings for a reason: they help us survive.

The trick is to control them, so they do not control you.
 
  Reply With Quote
Xable is offline Xable Post #5  October 17,2011, 3:26am
Xable's Avatar

gives up.

Virtuoso

Joined: Mar 2010

Texas

Posts: 2,607

See profile

So too for deceit, jealousy, and fear. We have these feelings for a reason: they help us survive.
Ah, but do we need deceit, jealousy, fear, and others because they do exist? Or, in the absence of those things in this world, would we still need them?
 
  Reply With Quote
harnomygirl is offline harnomygirl Post #6  October 17,2011, 6:52am
harnomygirl's Avatar

Power Poster

Joined: Mar 2011

Posts: 6,418

See profile

Xable wrote :
Ah, but do we need deceit, jealousy, fear, and others because they do exist? Or, in the absence of those things in this world, would we still need them?
Those traits probably made us better hunters. Deceit is necessary for tracking and trapping, jealousy creates the competitive spirit needed for more bountiful hunts, and fear keeps hunters safe.

I'd thought this thread was about whether women were capable of leading without becoming masculine. I wasn't sure why masculine traits were considered dark.
 
  Reply With Quote
Diana_P is offline Diana_P Post #7  October 17,2011, 2:24pm
Diana_P's Avatar

Board Leader - Religion & Spirituality

Joined: Sep 2010

Posts: 1,118

See profile

harnomygirl wrote :
Those traits probably made us better hunters. Deceit is necessary for tracking and trapping, jealousy creates the competitive spirit needed for more bountiful hunts, and fear keeps hunters safe.

I'd thought this thread was about whether women were capable of leading without becoming masculine. I wasn't sure why masculine traits were considered dark.
I’m not sure either, but to steal a quote from Star Wars, “Anger, jealousy and fear all lead to the dark side…….”
 
  Reply With Quote
Reverse_Dragon is offline Reverse_Dragon Post #8  October 17,2011, 5:55pm
Reverse_Drago…'s Avatar

w00t w00t! I is getting married! Success at last.

Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 2011

Louisville, KY

Posts: 693

See profile

Perhaps I misunderstood the question of the thread. I was responding to the title.

"I'd thought this thread was about whether women were capable of leading without becoming masculine." - harnomygirl

I didn't pick up on this implication... but it is an interesting question. In the canon of traditional American gender roles, being assertive and forceful is associated with masculinity. Behavior that is demure and reticent, on the other hand, is associated with femininity.

It's a misogynistic social more that derives from the institutional patriarchal-ism of human society. It's one of the many lingering vestiges of the tyranny of the Y chromosome.

I think this prejudicial view of women as leaders is on its way out for good... at last.

As for more enlightened views of gender roles; I find confident, assertive women very sexy... and not at all masculine.
 
  Reply With Quote
notamaninpower is offline notamaninpower Post #9  October 18,2011, 11:19am
notamaninpowe…'s Avatar

anyone who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities

Enthusiast

Joined: Feb 2008

about 20 miles southwest of The Empire State Building

Posts: 865

See profile

It's a misogynistic social more that derives from the institutional patriarchal-ism of human society.
As well as the misogynistic dogmatism/directives of their much beloved 'good book'.
 
  Reply With Quote
harnomygirl is offline harnomygirl Post #10  October 18,2011, 11:29am
harnomygirl's Avatar

Power Poster

Joined: Mar 2011

Posts: 6,418

See profile

I didn't pick up on this implication...
I got if from the bold parts below:
Diana_P wrote :
There was an episode of Star Trek the original series where Captain Kirk is split into two beings by a transporter accident. One is aggressive, decisive, and masculine, but selfish and lacks compassion. The other is intelligent, logical, analytical, and kind, but is soft, feminine, indecisive, and having real trouble commanding the Starship. This episode was filmed in the 60’s so keep in mind that the Star Trek Universe at that time had no female Captains or Commanders.

As the episode progressed Captain Kirk gradually lost his ability to lead in spite of being reminded that command is a function of the intellect. Instead, the episode seemed to imply that most of our strengths are indeed derived from our dark side and we as human beings can not function without it.
It sounded as though we were being asked if we agree that masculine people have dark sides and can lead, and feminine people don't and can't.
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply
  • Page 1 of 2
  • 1
  • 2


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Topics
Topic Topic Starter Board Replies Last Post
Can Light become One with Dark? Sparkles56 Relationships 31 February 26,2011 9:40pm
Dating in the Dark ami1uwant Dating 14 August 11,2010 10:34am
Dating in the Dark VB_Girl Chit Chat 4 August 10,2010 9:42am
Strengths and Weaknesses? meri75 Creative Writing! 18 March 8,2010 8:07pm

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“ Excellent, thank you. I think I will leave out the first part, I think it is unnecessary information to give him. I'm not interested in putting myself out there like that and it might be a little ... ” –  generallyyou

Join the “Ending a friendship” discussion

“Alfred Hitchcock - 18 Steven Spielberg - 62 *notice what?” –  dmi

Join the “War of the Directors” discussion

“ I would be "certain people" :P The issue isn't a deal-breaker, but a very strong factor preference-wise, for me.” –  ThePriestess

Join the “How much does race play in your dating someone?” discussion

“Love Texas Hold'em!.. I'm thinking of trying another tournament this summer...not sure yet though.. Never entered a tournament before, outside of online ones. Personally I prefer to play with ... ” –  Freezepop

Join the “Favorite Card Game” discussion

“Make that 3! I also had a crush on Donny Osmond. I think I still have a record or two of his. Suzie ” –  legend29

Join the “Robin Gibbs Dead at 62...How Deep is Your Love?” discussion

“Oh, my revised profile can be seen in the forum in the section where you can ask for a profile review. Suzanne” –  SuzanneScorpio

Join the “Photo Review” discussion

“Just remember, everything that you are feeling and/or are capable of he is as well. If he wanted to reach you, he could. Right now he knows that you are hurting, and that this is not what you ... ” –  lynntlb78

Join the “Can I wait and move on at the same time?” discussion

“ Yohio. And the shortened form (Anya) is nice too.” –  ThePriestess

Join the “Where is Becky?!?” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 9:39am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0