Adam and Eve: A story, parable, or historical fact?


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Thread
FairOne is offline FairOne Post #31  May 24,2011, 11:39am
FairOne's Avatar

Everybody wants to go to heaven, but nobody wants to die

Veteran

Joined: Nov 2009

Posts: 1,548

See profile

AudioDad wrote :
I didn't either until I started actually reading the Bible....reading it closely and cover to cover. Took forever and a lot of it is really dry reading. Regardless, you'll find the book is chock full of contradictions. No doubt some 'round these parts will rush to claim that the contradictions really aren't contradictions at all and will offer up all manner of imanginative allegorical literary device explanations for them. You can plainly read the book for yourself and come to your own conclusions.

Don't take my word for it. After all, people like me are the witless dupes and rubes of the Atheist Elite who's primary aim is to kill off The One True God(tm) and usher in a new era of heathenism. Or something.
That's the funny thing about it; I've read the Bible and for whatever reason didn't really get/think about that until fairly recently.

And though I am not an atheist, I also believe a lot of the stories are largely allegorical and I don't take them literally. (Sorry AZ!). I believe the Bible was inspired by God, but clearly still written by man and along with that 'man' part comes the exaggerations, jockeying for position/control, and cultural nuances one could expect to find.
 
  Reply With Quote
AZJoe is offline AZJoe Post #32  May 24,2011, 11:48am
AZJoe's Avatar

In and Out

Quick Study

Joined: May 2011

Posts: 143

See profile

AudioDad wrote :
You seem overly wrapped around the axle about schools, instructors and pedigrees. As I've already explained, I've studied on my own. My library includes works from apologists, atheists, and everyone in between. This study began before the age of the internet (when people actually studied in libraries) and continues to this day. I've studied this stuff for the better part of two and a half decades. Does that make me an expert? Absolutely not. I embarked on this journey to strengthen and inform what was at the time my religious faith. Obviously, I came to a conclusion and arrived at a destination I didn't expect at all. All of it was undertaken with an open mind and open heart.

Look, this is really pretty simple and there's no cause get rattled about it. If you're going to eat up forum space and advance a position, please try to keep it coherent and concise....."credence on less reliable sources than what we have and then mix in a laughable conjectures that don't square with history or reason." I'm sure that all made sense to you, but to me it just sounds like more of the same "it doesn't square with my rigid, dogamatic and near literalist interpretations of the Bible so I'm going to cast aspersions on your intelligence and integrity."

Honestly, I don't think anyone is reading this stuff aside from you and I and isn't terribly interested in watching a bunch of puffery. Try to remain calm....you might just live longer and healthier.
Perhaps if you should take some of your own advice here and try calmly presenting your opinions less emotionally and objectively and with out so much apparent open hostility and ire & disrespect for others beliefs as well. You seem eager to generalize and trash and leave little room for constructive dialog when you do that.

I am truly sorry you seemed to have studied yourself out of your faith. I can imagine how that might make me bitter too and feel betrayed that all one hoped and believed in seems to now be false to you. More often than not it goes the other way - those curious but with open minds read the actual histories and writings and learn how amazing and profound it all is and convert.

There is a real risk of losing one's faith when one goes out into the world under altruistic desires to learn but is naive or not strong/mature enough yet in their own faith to punch through the fallacies that are being presented by those who are committed to fight Christian beliefs. Some authors are down right poison to the soul.

I have been blessed with a strong intellect and even stronger faith and have yet to come up against an argument that stands up to scrutiny and can prevail against the faith that was passed down to me. I have learned a lot too and have gotten even deeper faith from reading the atheist attacks. I am more convinced than ever of my faith. In the forums I have participated in I have seen more atheists convert than I have seen Christians fall away.

I am happy to learn though that you do seem to be sincere in pursuing the truth. Eventually you may come around again to rediscovering your faith - I hope you do. For the record I am not at all a literalist but rely on handed down teaching framework that is traceable to the apostolic era. The Christian faith was never intended to be learned and taught as if a do-it-yourself cookbook (the protestant theory of sola scriptura is an error and has caused more factions and sects that anything else I know of). The Faith teaching was rather always passed down by a sponsor of the Church through thorough teaching - takes about a year. That is not to say that one can not learn by reading on their own but its very risky to go it alone with no orthodox instruction.

Enough said.
 
  Reply With Quote
AudioDad is offline AudioDad Post #33  May 24,2011, 12:08pm
AudioDad's Avatar

...has left the building

Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 2008

Posts: 800

See profile

AZJoe wrote :
I am truly sorry you seemed to have studied yourself out of your faith. I can imagine how that might make me bitter too and feel betrayed that all one hoped and believed in seems to now be false to you. More often than not it goes the other way - those curious but with open minds read the actual histories and writings and learn how amazing and profound it all is and convert.
Believers often portray atheists as angry and/or bitter. For the record, I'm neither. Nor do I feel betrayed by anyone or anything. I take full responsibility for my life and my actions. I have a good life and a great outlook on the future. I have two beautiful daughters who are growing into strong and intelligent young women and whom I'm very proud of. I'm in a relationship with a wonderful woman who means the world to me and am genuinely optimistic about our future together. In pretty much every way, I have a great deal to be thankful for and am happier than I've ever been. And, not coicidentally, I arrived at this point in life through my own hard work and perserverance.

Each one of us has within us the capability to do this. Some find it on their own, others need a little help. That help comes in the form of friends, or family, or faith. I'll say it this way....you, me, everyone has the power inside themselves to turn their lives around. Some find this power and call it God...or Allah...or Jehoveh or any number of names. Doesn't really matter. Are you happy and fulfilled in life? Are treating your fellow human beings with dignity and respect? If yes, well, there's your answer.
Last edited by AudioDad; May 24,2011 at 12:12pm.
 
  Reply With Quote
AZJoe is offline AZJoe Post #34  May 24,2011, 12:10pm
AZJoe's Avatar

In and Out

Quick Study

Joined: May 2011

Posts: 143

See profile

AudioDad wrote :
I didn't either until I started actually reading the Bible....reading it closely and cover to cover. Took forever and a lot of it is really dry reading. Regardless, you'll find the book is chock full of contradictions. No doubt some 'round these parts will rush to claim that the contradictions really aren't contradictions at all and will offer up all manner of imanginative allegorical literary device explanations for them. You can plainly read the book for yourself and come to your own conclusions.

Don't take my word for it. After all, people like me are the witless dupes and rubes of the Atheist Elite who's primary aim is to kill off The One True God(tm) and usher in a new era of heathenism. Or something.
These really aren't contradictions at all.

Come on - really. If you imagined someone was trying to pull a fast one and deceive others don't you imagine they would have pulled one of the versions out of the text before they published rather than leaven it so obvious that you could trip over it?? Never read this before? Wow, its the first book in the bible how could you miss it?

Clearly that alone tells us that the authors were not using a purely literal meaning in the text. There were different expressions of the same truth (the principal truth being that out of nothing God made Creation). The enumeration of the things and even the order are not all that relevant. The 10 commandments vary slightly from OT books too. But they convey the same essential information.

There are some symbolic meanings in the days of the Genesis creation accounts that I won't get into right here. But all in all, if you are looking for a few apparent contradictions in the bible there are quite a few others. Why does not John give any account of the Last Supper when all the others did? Well the reason is because he focused on a different aspect of the priesthood and used a much different style of writing. Does that failure to mention the fact mean it did not happen? No - silence on a matter does not mean it does not exist. We could go around for weeks on this kind of stuff but all you will ultimately come to is the discovery that you are operating from an improper set of expectations on what the bible is. It sounds like you come from a previously literalist (possibly fundamentalist) Protestant tradition. If so this is a very hard position to be coming from given all the reading you have done. It is bound to cast doubts. You might consider that your entire original basis of expectation about what the bible is supposed to teach you could be deficient to begin with. It was never intended to be a comprehensive self-teaching book of Christian faith - that is a sad myth propagated from certain "Christian" sects arising since the 16th century.

It would be really helpful to you getting to the truth if you first took a different approach and assumed that there was no ulterior or devious motive by the religious and tried to assume these people who often died for their faith were descent and good people. Extend the benefit of the doubt before you completely close your mind to new insights.
 
  Reply With Quote
eH_Advice_Host_Renee is offline eH_Advice_Host_Renee Post #35  May 24,2011, 12:25pm

Writer

Joined: Sep 2008

Santa Monica, CA

Posts: 1,177

See profile

Hi All,

Glad to see such a robust discussion going on but it looks like posts are becoming overly personalized.

It is understandable that people will have very impassioned beliefs and opinions regarding this topic, but you are still expected to be respectful and civil to one another.

If you disagree with someone, that's fine, but you don't have to be disparaging when you contest their remarks.

If you've tried to present your POV in a non-contentious, calm way and somebody else still doesn't agree or get your point, agreeing to disagree is probably the best way to go. That way you aren't unduly frustrated and the focus can remain on the topic and not other members.

Argue the topic, not each other!

Thank you all for your cooperation.

Renee
eHarmony Advice Host
 
  Reply With Quote
AudioDad is offline AudioDad Post #36  May 24,2011, 12:28pm
AudioDad's Avatar

...has left the building

Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 2008

Posts: 800

See profile

AZJoe wrote :
These really aren't contradictions at all.

Come on - really. If you imagined someone was trying to pull a fast one and deceive others don't you imagine they would have pulled one of the versions out of the text before they published rather than leaven it so obvious that you could trip over it?? Never read this before? Wow, its the first book in the bible how could you miss it?
That a boy, Joe! I knew I could count on ya. For the record, I don't assume any malicious or deceitful intent on the part of biblical/gospel writers or redactors. Also for the record, I don't hate Christians or the Bible - I wouldn't bother keeping a dozen or so different translations and concordances around if I did. Quite the contrary, I still find the Bible fascinating....there's some really great stuff in there. I also have a number of other religious texts which I also find fascinating. The two Genesis accounts are, as you're probably aware, the result of two different versions winding up in the Bible (the 'P' and the 'J' versions). Not a problem for non-literalists but a real headache for inerrantists.

AZJoe wrote :
It sounds like you come from a previously literalist (possibly fundamentalist) Protestant tradition. If so this is a very hard position to be coming from given all the reading you have done. It is bound to cast doubts.
Not far off, actually. Started off that way, but then "evolved" (sorry, bad pun I know) into more of the stance you're coming from, then eventually to where I am now. Like I said earlier, this didn't happen overnight.
 
  Reply With Quote
AZJoe is offline AZJoe Post #37  May 24,2011, 12:31pm
AZJoe's Avatar

In and Out

Quick Study

Joined: May 2011

Posts: 143

See profile

FairOne wrote :
That's the funny thing about it; I've read the Bible and for whatever reason didn't really get/think about that until fairly recently.

And though I am not an atheist, I also believe a lot of the stories are largely allegorical and I don't take them literally. (Sorry AZ!). I believe the Bible was inspired by God, but clearly still written by man and along with that 'man' part comes the exaggerations, jockeying for position/control, and cultural nuances one could expect to find.
For the greater part no need to apologize. I am NOT a literalist either. I believe in the full sense of scripture as enumerated by Thomas Aquinas (1225 AD ) Summa Theologia . Sadly the Protestants taught a new doctrine called Sola Scriptura (by scripture alone) that assumes (wrongly) that scripture must always self-teach without any external instruction. This actually flies in the face of what the bible actually warns us about and is not stated anywhere in the bible (e.g. 2 Thes 2:15 tells us to conform to the oral teaching AND written word). So this has resulted in all manner of disappointments by those who expect to find cook-book answers but find the sort of apparent inconsistencies in the bible mentioned here and then end up falling away from the faith.

Its so hard to watch so many get frustrated and discouraged since they believe in these new doctrines that the early church and apostles NEVER actually taught at all.

There's a whole taxonomy of scriptural sense that extends from the two major categories: Literal and Spiritual. More here: The Senses of Scripture

I do hold that the scripture are inspired and are not full of the human artifacts you mention at all. That said, God certainly used the styles of the human author to say what He wanted to say in the vernacular and expressive and life experience of the author of a particular book.
 
  Reply With Quote
ANDR3W is offline ANDR3W Post #38  May 27,2011, 5:06am
ANDR3W's Avatar

Enthusiast

Joined: Dec 2008

South Florida

Posts: 734

See profile

Diana_P wrote :
This was great. Thanks.
Your welcome : )
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“ Excellent, thank you. I think I will leave out the first part, I think it is unnecessary information to give him. I'm not interested in putting myself out there like that and it might be a little ... ” –  generallyyou

Join the “Ending a friendship” discussion

“Alfred Hitchcock - 18 Steven Spielberg - 62 *notice what?” –  dmi

Join the “War of the Directors” discussion

“ I would be "certain people" :P The issue isn't a deal-breaker, but a very strong factor preference-wise, for me.” –  ThePriestess

Join the “How much does race play in your dating someone?” discussion

“Love Texas Hold'em!.. I'm thinking of trying another tournament this summer...not sure yet though.. Never entered a tournament before, outside of online ones. Personally I prefer to play with ... ” –  Freezepop

Join the “Favorite Card Game” discussion

“Make that 3! I also had a crush on Donny Osmond. I think I still have a record or two of his. Suzie ” –  legend29

Join the “Robin Gibbs Dead at 62...How Deep is Your Love?” discussion

“Oh, my revised profile can be seen in the forum in the section where you can ask for a profile review. Suzanne” –  SuzanneScorpio

Join the “Photo Review” discussion

“Just remember, everything that you are feeling and/or are capable of he is as well. If he wanted to reach you, he could. Right now he knows that you are hurting, and that this is not what you ... ” –  lynntlb78

Join the “Can I wait and move on at the same time?” discussion

“ Yohio. And the shortened form (Anya) is nice too.” –  ThePriestess

Join the “Where is Becky?!?” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 9:32am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0