Is there danger in being "spiritual and not religious"?


Reply
  • Page 1 of 2
  • 1
  • 2
 
Topic Tools Search this Thread
eHA_Admin_Lori is offline eHA_Admin_LoriAdvice Official Moderator Post #1  June 5,2010, 11:35am
eHA_Admin_Lor…'s Avatar

My one wish for you, is love. :)

Moderator

Joined: Nov 2008

Santa Monica, CA

Posts: 5,100

See profile

I saw this article:

Are there dangers in being 'spiritual but not religious'? - CNN.com

and wondered what the folks here would think.

Do you agree that absence of an organized religion in ones life leaves them less likely to live in a highly moral way?

Thanks in advance for an interesting and respectful discussion.
 
  Reply With Quote
meri75 is offline meri75 Post #2  June 6,2010, 4:04am
meri75's Avatar

really wants a double dissolution in 2011!

Power Poster

Joined: Mar 2009

Australia

Posts: 5,112

See profile

Do you agree that absence of an organized religion in ones life leaves them less likely to live in a highly moral way?
I think it is no different to any other belief of faith. There are those who are the real deal and those who are lip service experts.

As we've seen over and over in the media, being involved in religion isn't a guarantee that the person will live a moral lifestyle.

I do not think it is the religion in question which defines a person's ability to live morally; but their purity of heart.
 
  Reply With Quote
Luminous_Knight is offline Luminous_Knight Post #3  June 6,2010, 11:23pm
Luminous_Knig…'s Avatar

Quick Study

Joined: May 2010

Posts: 170

See profile

meri75 wrote :
I think it is no different to any other belief of faith. There are those who are the real deal and those who are lip service experts.

As we've seen over and over in the media, being involved in religion isn't a guarantee that the person will live a moral lifestyle.
Couldn't have said it better myself. So true.

Good day,
LK
 
  Reply With Quote
coeuri is offline coeuri Post #4  June 8,2010, 3:30pm
coeuri's Avatar

life is an interesting journey

Virtuoso

Joined: Jul 2008

home

Posts: 2,886

See profile

I looked at the article you mentioned and am of two minds about it. Here are some of my thoughts on the issues raised there.

I don't think being a part of any organized anything insures you will be more moral than those who are outside of it. As Meri, said, who we are inside has more to do with the choices we make. Also, what are choices are will be influenced by our environment, even to the point of our organized groups taking on the influences brought by the various cultures that make up its constituency.

Having said that though, I do believe it is important to find a faith community to be a part of for encouragement and accountability. We do live in a diverse world and it is easy to naval gaze and call it faith. For me, faith, a connection to something greater than ourselves will lead us to look beyond ourselves to the world in which we live.

A community of others gives us a place to work through our beliefs, our "spirituality" and can help us to discern what is related to our belief in something higher in our own being, what is for our higher good even, and what is simply related to wants that are based on a world of one -- ourselves.
 
  Reply With Quote
neardc is offline neardc Post #5  June 8,2010, 4:05pm
neardc's Avatar

Kumbaya, people!

Power Poster

Joined: Jun 2008

Near DC (duh!)

Posts: 7,738

See profile

Hmmm.... I guess I don't see "spiritual but not religious" as simply being an alternative to choosing a church. In fact, I don't assume that it requires a belief in God. And, if your spiritualism does not include God, why would you affiliate with a church where God is worshiped?

Certainly being part of a religious community doesn't assure morality (think here, for example, of the group of Congressmen who shared a house here in DC for religious fellowship, and yet nearly all of them had extramarital affairs or engaged in other bad behavior). Nor does being non-religious mean that you don't have a moral code or feel responsibility for helping people who are poor or others in need. In fact, if you are self-motivated to do that, isn't that "better" than doing so simply because a religious community makes "demands" on you?

Just because you are not part of a larger spiritual group doesn't mean that your gaze only focuses inward...
 
  Reply With Quote
big_bear7 is offline big_bear7 Post #6  June 22,2010, 8:18pm
big_bear7's Avatar

Newbie

Joined: Jun 2010

Posts: 1

See profile

No, there is absolutly no danger what so ever. A lot of people are religious, in fact most of the world but very few people are spiritual. Just take one second and think of, lets say 3 people that you know that go to church(it doesn't matter what kind of church). of those 3 people how many of them just go because it's a habit. now they know everything about there religon backwards and forwards but they don't feel it in there hearts. I know a lot of people like that. In my humble opinion being a spirtual person is much more important then just being religous.
 
  Reply With Quote
ThePriestess is offline ThePriestess Post #7  June 22,2010, 8:28pm
ThePriestess's Avatar

It's a glow-in-the-dark compass ring, so you don't get lost.

Sage

Joined: Apr 2008

Canadian POW held in Florida

Posts: 15,919

See profile

Do you agree that absence of an organized religion in ones life leaves them less likely to live in a highly moral way?
No, not at all ... and I would question the reasoning of those supporting this conclusion.
Last edited by ThePriestess; June 22,2010 at 8:31pm. Reason: Simply defining what is or is not moral/ethical is a difficult enough question ...
 
  Reply With Quote
Bob_dB is offline Bob_dB Post #8  August 3,2010, 12:14pm
Bob_dB's Avatar

Newbie

Joined: Jul 2009

Posts: 48

See profile

lol - see xkcd comic #774 LINK (and don't forget to mouse-hover)
 
  Reply With Quote
thatkerbygirl is offline thatkerbygirl Post #9  August 6,2010, 8:41pm
thatkerbygirl's Avatar

oh, how I love summer breaks :-D

Newbie

Joined: Jun 2010

Boise/Pocatello

Posts: 8

See profile

I am a Christ-follower; however, I do not wish people to think of me being religious. To me, being religious means to be (act) legalistic, holier than thou art, and without relationship. The Pharisees and Saducees in the New Testament were very religious, and they made sure that everyone around them knew that fact.

To me, being spiritual is praising, praying to, and daily participating in a relationship with God.

I believe that some people have the ability to be both because each aspect is equally important to how he/she demonstrates their own faith. These people usually belong to a church whose own docturnal beliefs are demonstrated in a conservative manner.

With all this said, I do not belive there is any specific danger in being "spiritual and not religous" because neither can guarantee salvation. This is what I believe to be the more important issue; and really, only God can decide if our being more of one type is dangerous for our life or not.
 
  Reply With Quote
LoudMouth is offline LoudMouth Post #10  September 14,2010, 2:57pm
LoudMouth's Avatar

Newbie

Joined: Sep 2010

Ohio

Posts: 4

See profile

No danger at all in my opinion. What people call themselves and the categories they list themselves under don't tell us much about the kind of person that they truly are.
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply
  • Page 1 of 2
  • 1
  • 2


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“The tennis ball story is a good analogy, RD, and that's how I interpret "gut feeling" -- a conclusion/sense of something that's a thought, not a feeling; though it will have feelings associated with ... ” –  Sassafras54

Join the “Is Your Gut Leading - or Misleading You?” discussion

“Agree. Given where you are emotionally, I would cease all communication with Mr. Trade Show. You're vulnerable. He's up for a challenge. It's playing with fire. You'll be in a bad place in the ... ” –  emma_hazards

Join the “Received lovely email from former poofer” discussion

“How about phone calls, then?” –  barbarella_42

Join the “Advice on Response time” discussion

“I have never spoken to a woman like he has. Yeah, I have never spoken to a woman like that either. It is a hard call to whether he is just as jerk, or whether he is a player. Both are feasible ... ” –  ScottK

Join the “So, men. Explain this to me, please!” discussion

“I have come to this same conclusion. Thank you.” –  bibittyboo

Join the “Confused about date #2” discussion

“Harmonygirl, I do not usually make up my mind on blanket situations but instead would examine each one on it's own merits, so I cannot answer your question. However, just in the going about of daily ... ” –  Ephemera

Join the “Atheism, Religion and Tolerance” discussion

“I was ok until the kiss on the cheek part....That doesn't sound like your defenses were up at all... It's one thing for a guy to walk up and start with the cheesy lines....But as soon as I say, "no ... ” –  Ingytravel

Join the “So this guy walks into a bar . . .” discussion

“ No. It is not wise. You have to throw all your eggs into one basket for love to work at all. Relationships are inherently riskier than careers. You can't use the same rules. You might lose ... ” –  harnomygirl

Join the “Becoming Exclusive” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 1:54pm.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0