Bah ha ha You Got a Pay Cut!


Reply
  • Page 2 of 2
  • 1
  • 2
 
Topic Tools Search this Thread
Rand_011 is offline Rand_011 Post #11  November 18,2009, 5:41pm
Rand_011's Avatar

Enthusiast

Joined: Jan 2008

Anaheim

Posts: 998

See profile

dito wrote :
Never fret! The house is going to pass another jobs bill!
But if they'd just do with jobs what they did with COBRA benefits, everything would be hunkie dorie ... Just enact a freeze on employers retroactive back to September of 2008 ... So all employees that want to be rehired on, at their last wage with that employer, can elect to do so and the employers will be forced to hire them and continue paying those wages ...

/sarcasm off
 
  Reply With Quote
AudioDad is offline AudioDad Post #12  November 29,2009, 9:43am
AudioDad's Avatar

Enthusiast

Joined: Aug 2008

Posts: 751

See profile

We can blame the cheap labor all we want but a lot of these jobs are leaving because America has the highest corporate tax rate in the world.
The problem with this statement is that it's highly subjective as the tax laws in most countries are extremely complex, with tax burdens falling differently on different groups in each country and sub-national unit. It's generally been recognized for about the past 20 years that America has the 2nd highest combined corporate tax rate of all OECD nations. Currently, Japan 'enjoys' the highest level of combined taxation of its corporations at about 39.54%. Thing is, that's on paper. The actual, effective corporate tax rate that most corporations pay in the US is typically much lower thanks to the numerous, and often quite generous, tax breaks/subsidies that they've enjoyed for quite awhile now. That corporate welfare costs you and I over 92 billion dollars a year. Relative to GDP, the amount of tax revenues the US collects from its corporations is at a 60 year low and amounts to only about 2% of GDP. Of all OECD nation members, the US collects the 4th lowest amount of tax revenues from its corporations.

By way of comparison, the Slovak Republic collects more tax revenues from its corporations relative to its GDP than the US does from its GDP. Simply lowering the corporate tax rate in the US probably wouldn't do much to keep jobs here. Wage structures, cost of benefits, etc. continue to make manufacturing overseas a cheaper proposition - at least on paper (the hidden, warranty costs of rework and quality problems are typically overlooked by CEO's and Wallstreet). Even higher skilled jobs like engineering are being offshored now. It's a trend that will ultimately make a us a second rate power in the world.
Last edited by AudioDad; November 29,2009 at 9:47am.
 
  Reply With Quote
sabete2002 is offline sabete2002 Post #13  November 29,2009, 2:24pm
sabete2002's Avatar

About to celebrate one year with the best guy on the planet!

Veteran

Joined: Jun 2008

New Jersey

Posts: 2,335

See profile

AudioDad wrote :
The problem with this statement is that it's highly subjective as the tax laws in most countries are extremely complex, with tax burdens falling differently on different groups in each country and sub-national unit. It's generally been recognized for about the past 20 years that America has the 2nd highest combined corporate tax rate of all OECD nations. Currently, Japan 'enjoys' the highest level of combined taxation of its corporations at about 39.54%. Thing is, that's on paper. The actual, effective corporate tax rate that most corporations pay in the US is typically much lower thanks to the numerous, and often quite generous, tax breaks/subsidies that they've enjoyed for quite awhile now. That corporate welfare costs you and I over 92 billion dollars a year. Relative to GDP, the amount of tax revenues the US collects from its corporations is at a 60 year low and amounts to only about 2% of GDP. Of all OECD nation members, the US collects the 4th lowest amount of tax revenues from its corporations.

By way of comparison, the Slovak Republic collects more tax revenues from its corporations relative to its GDP than the US does from its GDP. Simply lowering the corporate tax rate in the US probably wouldn't do much to keep jobs here. Wage structures, cost of benefits, etc. continue to make manufacturing overseas a cheaper proposition - at least on paper (the hidden, warranty costs of rework and quality problems are typically overlooked by CEO's and Wallstreet). Even higher skilled jobs like engineering are being offshored now. It's a trend that will ultimately make a us a second rate power in the world.
Good to see you back, AudioDad!
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply
  • Page 2 of 2
  • 1
  • 2


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“It's important to understand the way a site works. Rigidly assuming / insisting that eH works likes all the others you're used to isn't utilizing the site functions to your best advantage. No.... ... ” –  Wiseman2

Join the “First contact on eHarmony, smile, questions, email?” discussion

“ If you have yet to meet, you don't know him or whether you two will form a connection. Connections formed over e-mail tend to be fantasies. You will see this echoed over and over by experienced ... ” –  shapeShifter79

Join the “How do i recoonect with him again?” discussion

“ Then it's a bit premature to worry about being friend-zoned. The first step is to go out on dates! What specific steps did you try? How many women did you ask out in person? Did you buy a ... ” –  shapeShifter79

Join the “For women to answer: How to avoid the friend zone” discussion

“ This is an old thread. She asked this in 2010. By now they are likely very exclusive or very over. ” –  shapeShifter79

Join the “is there a reason to ask if we're exclusive?” discussion

“ I'm sure he wouldn't get that. And I can't be sure that was the actual message. But it sems kind of likely to me.” –  boomer_gal

Join the “Why am I not successful?” discussion

“Hi eccemuliere and welcome to eHA.On an internet forum like eHA, you're going to get a wide variety of responses; some you'll like and some you won't. It's best to focus on the ones that speak to ... ” –  Sassafras54

Join the “Being blown off, or something else?” discussion

“ Although I have ignored my gut at times, in hindsight it's always been right, in terms of recognizing bad choices. QUOTE] But once we realize our past mistakes, we can use our reason to clue us ... ” –  eccemuliere

Join the “Is Your Gut Leading - or Misleading You?” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 3:50am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0