Advice and Support from Thousands of Users Just Like You

Politics Left? Right? Liberal? Conservative? How does politics and the social values you hold affect dating and relationships?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
lizard47's Avatar

lizard47 who you surround yourself with tells what you really believe

Veteran

Join Date: Apr 2008

Posts: 1,637

See profile

legend29 wrote :
BTW: Love your avatar....he lost most of his sponsors but FOX kept him on anyway. I love watching Glenn Beck...but did not agree with him when he called Obama a racist...but he has helped me to understand what ACORN is about and for that I am truly grateful.

But....I like to keep myself informed and as FOX always likes to say "fair and balanced", so I also watch Rachel Maddow...her thoughts can be very interesting...indeed!
Hey Legend!
I like Glenn Beck too, maybe because he is a conservatist not a Republican(for those that don't know he criticized President Bush often). While I don't like it when someone calls another a racist I did understand where Beck was coming from but am also wise enough to say that it will never be accepted when a white person calls a black person a racist even if it is true. But that is a whole other topic.
I saw today that a New York paper is saying that Rep. Joe Wilson's outburst was motivated by race........OMG!!! I am so sick of those who oppose President Obama being told they are racist. He said something that was, based on independent examinations of the House bill say that it will include illegals, viewed as not true and spoke out. That does not make him a racist, rude yes but not a racist.
- September 13th, 2009, 11:22 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#21   Reply With Quote
last12C's Avatar

last12C Is finding plenty to be thankful for :-)

Virtuoso

Join Date: Apr 2008

Posts: 3,030

See profile

I'm not going to actually comment directly on whether or not the heckling was rude, I just want to throw something against the wall. Like it or not, this address turned into a national Town Hall Meeting by virtue of the escalating frustration within the voting public, by definition an informal venue that encourages people to participate and voice their opinion. They were never intended to be a formal sit-there-politely-and-keep-your-mouth-shut event; the intent was to give the public a voice. We need that format that allows for public dissent, rather than allowing the speaker to present uncontested. When you have an issue as controversial and emotional as what was presented in this one, why would it shock so many people that fervent dissent was voiced? There are Town Hall Meetings going on all across the country on this subject - and many of them have been extremely heated. Wilson had just come from the largest town hall meeting in the history of South Carolina where his constituents had gotten very passionate about their concerns regarding this issue. I have no difficulty visualizing them sitting in their living rooms in front of their TVs back home yelling the words that came out of his mouth that night. As such, he was accurately representing the concerns and feelings of those he was elected to represent. I think that a lot of people are getting tired of being forced to listen to endless speeches that don't promote clarity and that pontificate uncontested what they perceive as untruth on issues that will reach into their pockets. A lot of people are getting frustrated at not being heard. That is what is creating a lot of the emotion that is on display. I'm not trying to justify his behavior; I am just trying to see it for what it was. Whether Obama likes it or not he is going to take whatever heat is generated on this issue because it is his plan - just like every other president has had to do throughout the entire history of this nation - a nation that was designed to make the President accountable to the People, not vice versa. America has never been depicted as being populated by polite, sweet docile creatures, but of fiercely independent people who demand their rights. Hoo Yah!

Last edited by last12C; September 13th, 2009 at 01:25 pm. Reason: corrections, corrections, corrections...
- September 13th, 2009, 12:33 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#22   Reply With Quote
vinlukin's Avatar

Quick Study

Join Date: Jul 2009

Posts: 57

See profile

dito wrote :
I am offended that he apologized.
My thoughts exactly.
- September 13th, 2009, 12:37 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#23   Reply With Quote
graceventually's Avatar

graceventually is getting ready for the Nov. 28 wedding, and so won't be posting much!

Virtuoso

Join Date: May 2008

Posts: 3,050

See profile

lizard47 wrote :
Again 2 wrongs do not make a right, but are you saying it was ok when the Democrats booed President Bush during a State of the Union Address??? Just curious because I do not recall anyone being threatened with censure after that, I am not trying to single you out Grace just asking in general.
Personally, I don't recall booing at the State of the Union, but I do recall Democrats using another tactic that I don't care for at all, that of what I call "sarcastic applause"; i.e., applauding only the first half of a sentence in a speech so that it is taken out of context. Sometimes, during Bush's last couple of State of the Union addresses, it was accompanied by some catcalls, too (which might be what you described as booing? Whatever we call it, it certainly wasn't friendly towards President Bush). There was both cheering and booing following Wilson's outburst, too; and I didn't think that was great. However, Wilson shouted alone, and was easily identifiable, and so becomes easier to censure. As I understand it, they are not supposed to shout on the floor of Congress. But as any schoolteacher can tell you, it's easier to catch and punish one student who is out of line than to punish a whole group.
I
- September 13th, 2009, 12:48 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#24   Reply With Quote
Diann1950's Avatar

Diann1950 Back to work for the week

Pacesetter

Join Date: May 2009

Posts: 269

See profile

Unfortunately all the heat and venom by all disguises the real issue. For those of us lucky enough to still have employer sponsored health insurance that is really adequate still face the problem that we are only one paycheck away from being uninsured. Something must be done, we all must pay for it, and we are the only democracy that doesn't insure all our people. I would rather wait in line for help than see someone die or be horribly damaged because he/she has no insurance and can only get crisis care through the emergency room. This is as much a moral as economic issue.
- September 13th, 2009, 01:03 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#25   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

Seneca's Avatar

Seneca a Dios

Quick Study

Join Date: Aug 2009

Posts: 230

See profile

The Liberal news media organizations have reported that "thousands" of people marched in D.C. yesterday in opposition to Obama's health care reform. As usual - they spoke falsely in an attempt to downplay the amount of opposition to the current people in government, including Obama.
In Reality - there were many tens of thousands of marchers and they were not protesting JUST the health care issue. They were protesting too much government in our lives AND too much government spending AND too much government that we have not had a voice in AND they were carrying hundreds of signs calling that so-called "heckler", South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson a HERO !
No matter how much the Liberal Media and Congress and Mr. Obama want to pretend otherwise - We, the People are ANGRY and it is going to get much worse.

Personally, I happen to agree with the marchers.

Last edited by Seneca; September 13th, 2009 at 03:01 pm.
- September 13th, 2009, 01:18 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#26   Reply With Quote
last12C's Avatar

last12C Is finding plenty to be thankful for :-)

Virtuoso

Join Date: Apr 2008

Posts: 3,030

See profile

Seneca wrote :
The Liberal news media organizations have reported that "thousands" of people marched in D.C. yesterday in opposition to Obama's health care reform. As usual - they spoke falsely in an attempt to downplay the amount of opposition to the current people in government, including Obama.
In Reality - there were more than 2 million marchers and they were not protesting JUST the health care issue. They were protesting too much government in our lives AND too much government spending AND too much government that we have not had a voice in AND they were carrying hundreds of signs calling that so-called "heckler", South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson a HERO !
No matter how much the Liberal Media and Congress and Mr. Obama want to pretend otherwise - We, the People are ANGRY and it is going to get much worse.

Personally, I happen to agree with the marchers.
Again, I say Hoo Yah!

Last edited by last12C; September 13th, 2009 at 01:43 pm. Reason: Sorry, I've watched '300' about 12 times this week :-)
- September 13th, 2009, 01:27 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#27   Reply With Quote
neardc's Avatar

Volunteer Community Leader

Join Date: Jun 2008

Posts: 5,042

See profile

Seneca wrote :
The Liberal news media organizations have reported that "thousands" of people marched in D.C. yesterday in opposition to Obama's health care reform. As usual - they spoke falsely in an attempt to downplay the amount of opposition to the current people in government, including Obama.
In Reality - there were more than 2 million marchers and they were not protesting JUST the health care issue. They were protesting too much government in our lives AND too much government spending AND too much government that we have not had a voice in AND they were carrying hundreds of signs calling that so-called "heckler", South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson a HERO !
No matter how much the Liberal Media and Congress and Mr. Obama want to pretend otherwise - We, the People are ANGRY and it is going to get much worse.

Personally, I happen to agree with the marchers.
OL, puleeze! There is no frickin' way that there were "more than 2 million marchers" here...lol. We wouldn't even have been able to get around town if that were the case. There has never been a gathering or march on Washington with 2 million people, and that most certainly includes this march (I challenge you to provide even one iota of hard evidence that there were that many people here...lol). Even the Obama inauguration, which basically shut down the city because there were so many people coming to the event and was the largest gathering ever on the Mall, didn't officially register 2 million people.

The Washington Post reported that "many tens of thousands" marched; even the ultra-conservative Washington Times put it like this: "Rally leaders estimated the crowd at about 75,000, but others said it was larger than that. Organizers had expected between 25,000 and 50,000." That's a decent turnout in itself; you just destroy your own credibility by exaggerating the numbers to such a fantastical degree.
- September 13th, 2009, 02:26 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#28   Reply With Quote
lizard47's Avatar

lizard47 who you surround yourself with tells what you really believe

Veteran

Join Date: Apr 2008

Posts: 1,637

See profile

neardc wrote :
OL, puleeze! There is no frickin' way that there were "more than 2 million marchers" here...lol. We wouldn't even have been able to get around town if that were the case. There has never been a gathering or march on Washington with 2 million people, and that most certainly includes this march (I challenge you to provide even one iota of hard evidence that there were that many people here...lol). Even the Obama inauguration, which basically shut down the city because there were so many people coming to the event and was the largest gathering ever on the Mall, didn't officially register 2 million people.

The Washington Post reported that "many tens of thousands" marched; even the ultra-conservative Washington Times put it like this: "Rally leaders estimated the crowd at about 75,000, but others said it was larger than that. Organizers had expected between 25,000 and 50,000." That's a decent turnout in itself; you just destroy your own credibility by exaggerating the numbers to such a fantastical degree.
Actually the initial reports of that number came from ABC News which has since said it made a mistake......so rather than jumping on someone for destroying their credibility maybe step back and politely correct them without being snarky.
- September 13th, 2009, 02:42 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#29   Reply With Quote
lizard47's Avatar

lizard47 who you surround yourself with tells what you really believe

Veteran

Join Date: Apr 2008

Posts: 1,637

See profile

Personally, I don't recall booing at the State of the Union, but I do recall Democrats using another tactic that I don't care for at all, that of what I call "sarcastic applause"; i.e., applauding only the first half of a sentence in a speech so that it is taken out of context. Sometimes, during Bush's last couple of State of the Union addresses, it was accompanied by some catcalls, too (which might be what you described as booing? Whatever we call it, it certainly wasn't friendly towards President Bush). There was both cheering and booing following Wilson's outburst, too; and I didn't think that was great. However, Wilson shouted alone, and was easily identifiable, and so becomes easier to censure. As I understand it, they are not supposed to shout on the floor of Congress. But as any schoolteacher can tell you, it's easier to catch and punish one student who is out of line than to punish a whole group.
I
Grace dear you just cost me. Someone who no longer posts but visited yesterday told me that you would not have any recollection of President Bush being booed and I said no Grace is an intelligent woman she would. Oh well pay out won't be that bad

Last edited by lizard47; September 13th, 2009 at 02:46 pm. Reason: typo
- September 13th, 2009, 02:45 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#30   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“So if you are seeing each other every weekend, having sex and both saying I love you to each other, but you haven't actually said the word 'exclusive', then it's okay to date other people?” – polly_anna

Join the “Ethical Considerations In Dating Multiple People” discussion

“I guee he hasnt asked you out yet.....he may be very nervous to ask you. Its normal for guys to be vare nervous because of the fear of rejection. He may be looking for other signs that show your ... ” – ami1uwant

Join the “i have a problem understanding this guy!” discussion

“I teach high school, so there isn't much I haven't heard or much that shocks me anymore. People also tend to trust me, so they tend to share things with me, as a result. It doesn't really bother ... ” – brneyedangel

Join the “Why overshare?” discussion

“ You admit to having no dating experience. So why are you so concerned with looking for things that may not really be that important anyway? Things that surely vary from person to person. Who ... ” – melman

Join the “Third Date” discussion

“Maybe they were hoping to find me?” – D_Lion

Join the “Is a Cruise a good Date?” discussion

“I think I have trouble with everyone's definition of "nice." Sometimes people think they are being nice. But they haven't really listened to what the other person wants or needs, so their effort is ... ” – melman

Join the “She does not want to be with me because I'm "too nice".” discussion

“I am sorry, maybe this is out of place, but: do we not all have our preferences, men and women alike? I am sure if we thought about it there are some things that we just will not accept in a mate, ... ” – gemend

Join the “Why is physical apperance such an issue” discussion



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:15 pm.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0