Advice and Support from Thousands of Users Just Like You

Politics Left? Right? Liberal? Conservative? How does politics and the social values you hold affect dating and relationships?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Rand_011's Avatar

Enthusiast

Join Date: Jan 2008

Posts: 779

See profile

jcd1968 wrote :
I wonder who will stop reading this article when Michael Moore is mentioned. I know he's an extremist nut. But, the article isn't about him or his beliefs:

www.nytimes.com/2007/08/12/opinion/12sun1.html
I read through the article ... And was able to see my way through the smoke and propaganda to the very end.

The glaring one being the touted 45 million uninsured that liberals love to use to hype up the situation ... Roughly a third are elligible and just don't bother applying for the free coverage already provided ... Roughly a third make 60k+ a year and just don't want to pay for it, they would rather buy their 50inch plasma screen tv's ... Of the remaining third, about a sixth are children and eligible for care once again ... So we are left with about ~8 million people that we need to work on getting insured ... That is a problem, yes, but it is not a 45 million person problem.

Then there's access to care and follow-up treatment ... I have viewed results for Canada and the numbers are staggering ... But then that is what happens under an HMO system.
- July 2nd, 2009, 09:53 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#11   Reply With Quote
kittencaboodle's Avatar

kittencaboodle I cut off all my hair!

Quick Study

Join Date: Jun 2009

Posts: 123

See profile

You probably know more than me about the uninsured. But it seems to me that the ones unable to get insurence would be higher. Every man and woman who works in a fast food/convenience store/some retail stores etc. don't have insurance and don't make enough for private policies. I find it hard to keep all those people under your figure. (I know that some fast-food people are offered insurance, but not usually unless they are management, same for retail and gas stations,etc.)
- July 2nd, 2009, 12:18 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#12   Reply With Quote
Rand_011's Avatar

Enthusiast

Join Date: Jan 2008

Posts: 779

See profile

Either way ... That is the basic breakdown for the uninsured ... These aren't my made up numbers ... There have been quite a few studies into the unisured market and these are the results ... Just about every health insurance company is trying to devise a plan to entice the 15 million some-odd affluent indviduals to buy it ... And just about every medical insurance company is trying to devise a plan to tap into the 8 million some-odd that can't afford current plans and are not elligible for federal assistance.
- July 2nd, 2009, 01:55 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#13   Reply With Quote
D_Lion's Avatar

D_Lion - Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 11,030

See profile

Kittencaboodle,

This is misleading, I think.

Low paid jobs nearly always have group policies available to workers, they just do not provide the same level of employer-paid portion as professionals and union workers get. Consequently, many people appear not to buy into the group coverage.

Many people working retail do in fact have health cover; they are young people still covered by parents, old people covered by medicare, or eligible for subsidized care due to their income and / or having dependants.

I think the 45 M comes from self-reports in the 2000 census. It is expected to be over 50 M in 2010.
- July 3rd, 2009, 01:03 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#14   Reply With Quote
kittencaboodle's Avatar

kittencaboodle I cut off all my hair!

Quick Study

Join Date: Jun 2009

Posts: 123

See profile

I was just talking about my own experiences, when I worked retail I had insurence after I was made a manager. However everyone under full time/manager status had part time status, thus no medical coverage offered. And I know that most of the smaller store in the mall did not offer insurence to anyone but management. I think that medicaid needs to be completely re-worked. The republicans have picked it over so much that most physicians won't even accept two of the three plans. They have reduced the amount so much that the cost to those without insurence has risen to astronomical amounts. Bush sent through several bills to reduce the amount spent by medicaid and medicare until it has become a shadow of the great plan it used to be. Instead of making a new money guzzling plan I think we should change the status of the ones currently being abused. Right now, if you work and make nothing and are not eligable for insurence you cannot get coverage from the gov't. but if you don't work, get money, food, and housing from the gov't and are in no way trying to help yourself THEN you can get insurence too. It's completely backwards and needs to be changed. I do not think it is the best insurence, maybe at one time, but not today.
- July 8th, 2009, 08:48 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#15   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

Kestral's Avatar

Enthusiast

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 773

See profile

It just seems to bad memory to call a comprehensive medical plan socialist when the same fundamental idea is how you pay for your military... you all chip in and together and you get something none of you could pay for individually.
The insurance companies you pay money to, do make a profit, while at the same time hiring lots of people who's only job is to find reasons to deny claims and coverage...
We in Canada do not by any measure have the best system, but we don't go bankrupt for getting sick, or having an accident... for every horror story example I hear of how bad it supposedly is here, I hear of millions there.
...somebody keeps saying that you have the best system.. as though there is nothing new to learn under the sun....
- August 2nd, 2009, 02:44 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#16   Reply With Quote
D_Lion's Avatar

D_Lion - Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 11,030

See profile

National defense is completely different from health care consumption. Defense is clearly a public good, where the benefit cannot be traced to you or I as benefiting from it.

Health care is something we purchase, due to our individual wants, and it is nearly totally traceable to an individual. Opinion varies as to the degree that there may be a “positive externality” to health spending, in greater economic productivity, for instance.

However, since the US has a superior economic performance to European nations and Japan, to say nothing of the non-democratic nations, it does appear that if there is any collective benefit to single-payer, it is not visible in economies.

For sure, I agree that a true, tax funded, single-payer system will reduce individual catastrophes, but at what cost to our economy and other desires? I also agree that our current insurance and industry bloat are getting fat off the system we have now, but are we likely to curtail this money trough (which is one of the largest campaign funding sources)?

Personally, I disagree with yet more taxes on people like me (younger and single), who are already disproportionately taxed, to provide yet more benefit to single mothers and older people, who are already disproportionately subsidized.

I fear the likely Washington consensus even more: keeping the industry bloat and adding mandatory cover. This is the most costly, least efficient, least equitable solution.
- August 2nd, 2009, 03:00 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#17   Reply With Quote
Kestral's Avatar

Enthusiast

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 773

See profile

He who dies with the most toys does not win, paticularly when he dies earlier from treatable health conditions.. like you do in the states.. you folks are 50th on the list in terms of longevity, and 38th in terms if infant mortality, all while spending twice as much per capita as the next closest country.
Spout some more catch phrases if it makes you feel better, but the facts remain.
Also as far as your defense budget goes, there's alot of people around the world who would dissagree with it being good for people.
I guess its easier to thump you chest in nationalist pride and rally around a 30 second sound byte then realise that there are others on this planet who are thinking about these things, and that reguardless of what you're being told, some of them are getting it right despite you.
- August 2nd, 2009, 03:46 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#18   Reply With Quote
hazmat's Avatar

hazmat is relaxing...

Veteran

Join Date: Apr 2008

Posts: 1,885

See profile

The 47 million uninsured Americans thrown out there by the administration is grossly distorted. According to the latest numbers thrown around, the breakdown is actually...
-12 million illegal aliens
-44% of the remaining 35 million are 20-30 somethings who don't have insurance because, though they can afford it, choose to spend their money on other things. (like homes, boats, new cars, etc.)
That leaves about 20 million, and half of those only need to apply to Medicare/Medicaid to receive benefits.

Don't believe the hype.
- August 2nd, 2009, 04:30 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#19   Reply With Quote
hazmat's Avatar

hazmat is relaxing...

Veteran

Join Date: Apr 2008

Posts: 1,885

See profile

The health care system does need to be overhauled. If the government wants to help, enforce the laws in place. Stop the tens of billions lost every year to Medicare/Medicaid fraud.

Stop the waste in the system.

Limit lawsuit awards that force doctors to do unnecessary and expensive tests because they're scared to death of malpractice lawsuits.
Focus on prevention efforts to promote good health, instead of treating every little symptom with drugs.
- August 2nd, 2009, 04:48 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#20   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Double-tapped on health insurance saulgoode Politics 34 June 26th, 2009 08:59 pm
Improve Your Health, Improve Your Love Life illustrator About You 4 June 17th, 2009 05:44 pm
FWB to Boyfriend - bad plan missy2u2002 Dating 13 June 11th, 2009 05:13 pm
Obama's Media Juggernaut Blitzkriegs Through France saulgoode Politics 20 June 8th, 2009 09:49 am
Health care reform & entrepreneurialship bigfincat Politics 6 May 15th, 2009 12:10 pm

Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“ He knows the abuse wasn't sexual, and he knows I am not gay or bisexual.” – charity8987

Join the “Argh, screwed up with new guy.” discussion

“my dream color is medium red brown with auburn tones” – jtwark

Join the “L'Oréal's 'Find Your Fall Hair Color' Sweepstakes!” discussion

“all, or most of my matches lately have been people that never reply to the first step of communication or their profile says to contact them on facebook. it seems to me that these profiles are people ... ” – Coca-Cola

Join the “matches dont respond/their profile says contact them on face book” discussion

“sounds like things are going great! i'd suggest that you just keep doing whatever it is you are doing. and don't sweat the little things.” – notyet

Join the “always so paranoid” discussion

“"Billed in one installment of $239.40" means, "Billed once for $239.40." Pardon me for saying this, but if I had less than $40 in my bank account, buying an eHarmony subscription will be the least ... ” – Coca-Cola

Join the “eHarmony payment plans” discussion

“It appears the OP hasn't participated in EhA since she login and posed her question initially. We all come to these advise boards with so many different backgrounds...in fact I wrote another post on ... ” – RoxyRedhead

Join the “Frustrated & Confused: Is He A Sexual Addict???” discussion

“Darn..is that it..the first sign of awkwardness and kapowie/ shoot the relationship down.Here we haver 2 introverts without, apparently, heaps of experience, looking not for a way to end it, but for ... ” – RoxyRedhead

Join the “what to do... second guessing myself” discussion



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:43 am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0