Advice and Support from Thousands of Users Just Like You

Politics Left? Right? Liberal? Conservative? How does politics and the social values you hold affect dating and relationships?

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
kittencaboodle's Avatar

kittencaboodle I cut off all my hair!

Quick Study

Join Date: Jun 2009

Posts: 123

See profile

I'm sorry if that was confusing it is almost 2 in the morning. I do not think socialism is all bad. I do think socialism is alive in well in our gov't anyway just not in a good way. I do think we should look to other socialist countries to improve out system of health and welfare. I do not think that industry and production should be socialistic. does this make it any clearer? or am I just tired emough to keep on prattling on anyway! lol
Gully you posted while I was writing my post! What an interesting coincidence! A situation like yours is exactly the thing that nails down the argument that insurance is not socialistic but capitalism at its worst. Profit for misery and desperation. I am so sorry to hear about your situation and wish you the best. My thought and prayers are with you!

Last edited by kittencaboodle; June 20th, 2009 at 11:54 pm.
- June 20th, 2009, 11:51 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#71   Reply With Quote
Bandmate's Avatar

Enthusiast

Join Date: Oct 2008

Posts: 950

See profile

gully wrote :
I have just spent several hours reading your posts. First, allow me to thank you all for the considerable thought that must have gone into the posts and for the comments from the residents of various countries.

Second, when I first read the OP my immediate thought was simplistic - socialism is bad because that is what we in the USA schools were tought. We had a quick review of the various forms of government and forms of economic systems, but all were bad except for our way. I don't think that most of us know the real differences and meaning of those differences. In fact, USA educated folks have trouble knowing the difference between the forms of government and the forms of economics. Some of that was actually apparent in some of the posts. I would think that there is a way that all of the systems could be used to benefit the citizens of each country. Obviously, the citizens of Iceland would support something other than what the citizens of Iran would support. And we are all aware that American citizens, in particular in my state of Texas, strongely believe that NO ONE tells THEM what to do. Government and taxes (even filing fees) are dispised but we demand good roads, defense, law enforcement, airports, etc. We want everything provided but are not willing to pay for them.
I have been in the reinsurance business for over 20 tough years and have been shocked by the greed that has occurred in that industry. I don't know of any insurance company licensed in the states that takes the total risk of any health policy. The risk is shared by some or many international companies through the purchase of reinsurance at various levels. You are free to self-insured your own health if you so dare. But if you have never seen a hospital bill for a 2 week stay that is $700,000 or one for a one month stay that is around $1,000,000, you might get that opportunity. For insurance companies and government programs, there are discounts and repricing. There is no program for the individual.

Four years ago, the company for which I worked unexpectedly closed. All the employees were left unisured due to the company being considered a small business, My husband worked for a Canadian company and no benefits were available. Due to on-going conditions (controlled diabetes and controlled high blood pressure), we were unable to obtain an insurance policy. So I was an insurance agent with no insurance after having coverage for over 35 years. Since then, I watched my husband die of cancer with no treatment and I now have a blood disorder that is very dangerous. I am not considered indigent and there is no county hospital system where I reside. So there is just the blunt reality that after paying lots of taxes (gladly), some to hospital districts and income taxes in states where we never lived, and never having been in a position to need help, I am stuck in quicksand. The hospitals will not take self-pay patients because that means mostly likely no-pay. Doctors do not like un-insured patients. And I feel like I paid my share and then some for all these years. I owned a business for many years and paid for the employee benefits during those years. There are no income taxes in Texas but you should be aware the companies pay significant taxes to the state. I never looked for a loophole which was mentioned in a previous post and would never have considered using one anyway.

Bottom Line: This believer in the US system is quickly changing and becoming open to socialism if that is what it takes to level the playing field. I realize that this sounds self-serving due to my current condition, but I have sat in several federally funded clinics for low income people even though I am not considered to be so; but I can get an appointment with a doctor there but have to pay for the office visit. I have seen the number of very sick people including babies and children who will never get the care or treatment needed for them to get well. My conclusion is that we lack compassion and lack the Christian caring and love that we hear so much about. We lost our hearts and souls somewhere along the way. Maybe socialism is not so bad after all.

Hugs to Y'all.
gully-belle

What makes you think that the lords of government are any better than the lords of capitalism..as a matter of fact they exchange crooks all the time...a beleif in socialism is a beleif in government,that somehow honesty and integrity reign there because they are elected...do you realy beleive that ?

Last edited by Bandmate; June 21st, 2009 at 09:53 am.
- June 21st, 2009, 09:50 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#72   Reply With Quote
The1Tomcat's Avatar

Quick Study

Join Date: Jun 2009

Posts: 73

See profile

gully wrote :
I have just spent several hours reading your posts. First, allow me to thank you all for the considerable thought that must have gone into the posts and for the comments from the residents of various countries.

Second, when I first read the OP my immediate thought was simplistic - socialism is bad because that is what we in the USA schools were tought. We had a quick review of the various forms of government and forms of economic systems, but all were bad except for our way. I don't think that most of us know the real differences and meaning of those differences. In fact, USA educated folks have trouble knowing the difference between the forms of government and the forms of economics. Some of that was actually apparent in some of the posts. I would think that there is a way that all of the systems could be used to benefit the citizens of each country. Obviously, the citizens of Iceland would support something other than what the citizens of Iran would support. And we are all aware that American citizens, in particular in my state of Texas, strongely believe that NO ONE tells THEM what to do. Government and taxes (even filing fees) are dispised but we demand good roads, defense, law enforcement, airports, etc. We want everything provided but are not willing to pay for them.
I have been in the reinsurance business for over 20 tough years and have been shocked by the greed that has occurred in that industry. I don't know of any insurance company licensed in the states that takes the total risk of any health policy. The risk is shared by some or many international companies through the purchase of reinsurance at various levels. You are free to self-insured your own health if you so dare. But if you have never seen a hospital bill for a 2 week stay that is $700,000 or one for a one month stay that is around $1,000,000, you might get that opportunity. For insurance companies and government programs, there are discounts and repricing. There is no program for the individual.

Four years ago, the company for which I worked unexpectedly closed. All the employees were left unisured due to the company being considered a small business, My husband worked for a Canadian company and no benefits were available. Due to on-going conditions (controlled diabetes and controlled high blood pressure), we were unable to obtain an insurance policy. So I was an insurance agent with no insurance after having coverage for over 35 years. Since then, I watched my husband die of cancer with no treatment and I now have a blood disorder that is very dangerous. I am not considered indigent and there is no county hospital system where I reside. So there is just the blunt reality that after paying lots of taxes (gladly), some to hospital districts and income taxes in states where we never lived, and never having been in a position to need help, I am stuck in quicksand. The hospitals will not take self-pay patients because that means mostly likely no-pay. Doctors do not like un-insured patients. And I feel like I paid my share and then some for all these years. I owned a business for many years and paid for the employee benefits during those years. There are no income taxes in Texas but you should be aware the companies pay significant taxes to the state. I never looked for a loophole which was mentioned in a previous post and would never have considered using one anyway.

Bottom Line: This believer in the US system is quickly changing and becoming open to socialism if that is what it takes to level the playing field. I realize that this sounds self-serving due to my current condition, but I have sat in several federally funded clinics for low income people even though I am not considered to be so; but I can get an appointment with a doctor there but have to pay for the office visit. I have seen the number of very sick people including babies and children who will never get the care or treatment needed for them to get well. My conclusion is that we lack compassion and lack the Christian caring and love that we hear so much about. We lost our hearts and souls somewhere along the way. Maybe socialism is not so bad after all.

Hugs to Y'all.
gully-belle
I highlighted the main points of my argument. Sorry to hear what you've been going through gully-belle. I hope the government and people in the US eventually realize that it's not all about impoverished people abusing the system... it's about making sure that people who want to work are enabled to do so and those that are cut down by tragedy of disease or accident are taken care of, if nothing more than because they have helped contribute to the system all of their lives.

It's a very cold selfish way of looking at thinking that seniors, who fought in wars for freedom or supported the country through many many years of productive service, should be tossed aside like chattel or made to pay higher taxes so that the young can have it easier. But I digress...

I won't re-re-restate my point. But not taken to extremes a capitalist society with socialistic tendencies would be my push in government. At this moment arguably the economies of Canada, the UK and EU are much stronger overall than the US. China, an extreme socialist country, is definitely in much better shape right now and owns a significant part of the US. Perhaps China is doomed to failure in its current political scheme and I can only hope so because I would like to see all of those people live with more freedoms and rights.

But then maybe the capitalists are right. Let's have less government and thus less taxes and more money in your pocket. If people want good roads, pick up a shovel and go buy some concrete yourself. Don't have time for that? Well you go and pay the contractor directly. Want to feel secure at the airport? Go hire your own private bodyguard and fly on a private jet. Want security at home? Buy yourself a gun or ten, barricade your home and hire armed security contractors so you can make it to the grocery store since we don't need government run police anymore. Someone attacked you or stole from you? Same thing, go find them yourself to bring before the courts.

Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness and safety? Check.
Constitution adhered to? Check.
US a proper republic again? Check.

All must be right with the world then... right?
- June 21st, 2009, 09:57 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#73   Reply With Quote
The1Tomcat's Avatar

Quick Study

Join Date: Jun 2009

Posts: 73

See profile

Bandmate wrote :
What makes you think that the lords of government are any better than the lords of capitalism..as a matter of fact they exchange crooks all the time...a beleif in socialism is a beleif in government,that somehow honesty and integrity reign there because they are elected...do you realy beleive that ?
Your forefathers did, otherwise me thinks they would have just stuck with the king at the time... being that there are no "lords" in the US government.

You have the right to be elected to the government if enough others believe in you... do you consider yourself honest and a holder of integrity? It's the voters fault ultimately if they hire an idiot liar, especially those who abstain from voting, definitely their fault. But, at least every 4 years you get the opportunity to kick the douche bag out and try again for an honest person like yourself.
- June 21st, 2009, 10:06 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#74   Reply With Quote
Tambersklfir's Avatar

Newbie

Join Date: Jun 2009

Posts: 3

See profile

Bandmate wrote :
Socialism is about creating freedom...what is this,joke night on the message board...if you added on someone else's dime i would agree...also government shares the capitalist love of money and power,they acquire it by force of law and sometimes just plain force..... other than that there is no difference.


No, it's not a joke. It's a statement of fact. The point you seem to be missing is that it is capitalism that works on "someone else's dime". When a person works they recoup the cost of employing them for their employer and their labours create a surplus which is taken by the employer as 'profit', despite the fact that it is not their labour that has created it. A socialist society would ensure that the workers received the full value of their work.
- June 21st, 2009, 10:52 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#75   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

bigfincat's Avatar

Virtuoso

Join Date: Nov 2008

Posts: 2,800

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
Yes, I think you are right about medical insurance – especially employee plans.

Where the argument breaks down somewhat is that if you buy insurance as a private person, you are not paying for pregnancies, obesity, cigarette addictions, etc. You pay a rate appropriate for your risk factors. That is a pooling of uncontrolled risk, the true meaning of insurance. That is very different than placing the cost for the higher consumption of females, families, old people, reckless people, onto the shoulders of younger, healthier people. That becomes something quite different.

Follow the precise segmenting of the market to its logical, most efficient, extreme, and you get self-insurance.
I do think medical insurance which forces me to pay for other people’s higher consumption is bad – as it has priced me, and many other low-paid young people completely out of the market.

Maybe old people should pay higher tax so that young people can actually afford decent housing – after all, they are paying a $200 mortgage since they bought a house in 1975. I know many people who can not afford health insurance, but I do not know anyone without a home (yet.)
Private insurance is not a separate thing from employer based insurance. They are still as much a part of that system as the employer based system. They are still placed into the profit margin planning of the industry which effects the prices for everyone.
- June 21st, 2009, 11:06 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#76   Reply With Quote
D_Lion's Avatar

D_Lion - Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 11,030

See profile

Tambersklfir wrote :

No, it's not a joke. It's a statement of fact. The point you seem to be missing is that it is capitalism that works on "someone else's dime". When a person works they recoup the cost of employing them for their employer and their labours create a surplus which is taken by the employer as 'profit', despite the fact that it is not their labour that has created it. A socialist society would ensure that the workers received the full value of their work.

Labor does receive the full value for their work. “Profit” is not an excess return to labor, it is a return to capital invested in an enterprise.

If the worker wishes to receive more, he should pay for the factory, the working capital, the raw material, the indirect labor, etc.

Some do, though personal shareholdings, ESOP’s, union ownership stakes, and so forth.
- June 21st, 2009, 11:48 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#77   Reply With Quote
bigfincat's Avatar

Virtuoso

Join Date: Nov 2008

Posts: 2,800

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
Labor does receive the full value for their work. “Profit” is not an excess return to labor, it is a return to capital invested in an enterprise.

If the worker wishes to receive more, he should pay for the factory, the working capital, the raw material, the indirect labor, etc.

Some do, though personal shareholdings, ESOP’s, union ownership stakes, and so forth.
This entire statement is one of belief & not fact. Just like any other value assessment we will all have a different one that is neither correct or incorrect.

Wages are influenced by power thus the word fair does not come into play in my mind. Those 2 things cannot exist in the same equation. I would conclude that full value for labor would be one that is fair. I cannot ignore the power struggle in the assessment of full value. But that is just my belief.
- June 21st, 2009, 12:06 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#78   Reply With Quote
The1Tomcat's Avatar

Quick Study

Join Date: Jun 2009

Posts: 73

See profile

Just a personal point for other's amusement...

While I'm playing on this forum with socialist ideas I'm groaning over the news reporting on how the NDP party in Canada has had some growing power on the federal level... the NDP is basically extreme left socialist party that I know for a fact would bankrupt Canada.

Would it also surprise others that I'm considered right wing in Canada since I vote Conservative?

Just notes for ironies sake.
- June 21st, 2009, 12:27 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#79   Reply With Quote
bigfincat's Avatar

Virtuoso

Join Date: Nov 2008

Posts: 2,800

See profile

The1Tomcat wrote :
Just a personal point for other's amusement...

While I'm playing on this forum with socialist ideas I'm groaning over the news reporting on how the NDP party in Canada has had some growing power on the federal level... the NDP is basically extreme left socialist party that I know for a fact would bankrupt Canada.

Would it also surprise others that I'm considered right wing in Canada since I vote Conservative?

Just notes for ironies sake.
You are pretty consistent in that it seems clear that you like the idea of blending into a social democracy but that trying to find the happy medium is a very tricky thing.

That is pretty much everyone's dilemma in the US. Everyone wants some socialist programs even if it is just a defense program. Everyone places their line in a different place along the spectrum.
- June 21st, 2009, 12:41 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#80   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

Reply

Bookmarks

« Bah! | Array | - »
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
eHarmony Profile Workshop: Question 6: What is the most important quality you seek in another? eHA_Admin_Lori Using eHarmony 58 November 13th, 2009 05:35 pm
eHarmony Profile Workshop: Question 3: "Who has been most influential person in your life, & why?' eHA_Admin_Lori Using eHarmony 63 November 13th, 2009 05:29 pm
eHarmony Profile Workshop - Question 2: What are the THREE things for which you are MOST thankful? eHA_Admin_Lori Using eHarmony 76 November 13th, 2009 05:26 pm
Question for guys 20-35ish Red28 About You 39 November 5th, 2009 09:30 pm
How do you respond to "What personal habits are important to you" question jlb896 Using eHarmony 16 June 9th, 2009 09:30 am

Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“I guess to get my dream color, I need two boxes of 8RB Reddish Blonde.  Thanks!” – choochoo

Join the “L'Oréal's 'Find Your Fall Hair Color' Sweepstakes!” discussion

“So I've learned from these posts that I am not wrong for feeling this way. I agree, weekend dates hold more weight...more time, no work pressure the next day etc. So, given all of this, is there a ... ” – Sawyer76

Join the “Is there a difference between weekday and weekend dates?” discussion

“ There is absolutely no rational reason why you can't go out as long as you want. He was only speaking of his own personal experiences. I know no one who has any direct correlation between length ... ” – Can_I_just_be_Jo

Join the “always so paranoid” discussion

“I have been pursued and it didn't work. I feel that if you aren't interested in someone, nothing they do can really change that. I went out with a guy and didn't really feel a connection. Went on a ... ” – Sawyer76

Join the “does persistance pay off?” discussion

“I actually think the variety in response is quite helpful. Even Harvey had a valid point to consider though you might not like his bedside manners. This woman needs to understand why she chose ... ” – nightling

Join the “Frustrated & Confused: Is He A Sexual Addict???” discussion

“ Nice Melcalrrt. I have to tell you I am a runner too and every time I see a runner with a prosthetic running leg I am in awe. I always think if that happened to me I hope I have the courage and ... ” – sqg123

Join the “Girls stop communicating after seeing my pix” discussion

“Yes I'd say he likes you a lot, but has some confidence issues. If you're interested, keep taking the initiative and ask him on a low-stress date like roguewolf suggested. He may gain confidence ... ” – kevin76

Join the “i have a problem understanding this guy!” discussion

“I rather fear with this thread that we are in danger of overlooking the fact that men do fall in love with women that they start off "just" having sex with. It is not always so but it does happen ... ” – nightling

Join the “bootycall” discussion



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:42 am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0