Bush Booed At Obama's Inauguration


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Thread
dnnmllr is offline dnnmllr Post #121  January 26,2009, 12:00pm
dnnmllr's Avatar

"Steady my feet in accord with your promise, Let not iniquity lead me"...

Veteran

Joined: Feb 2008

Pennsylvania

Posts: 1,600

See profile






He lied, manipulated, distorted. He shredded the Constitution. He started a war of "choice" (his word) and so, is responsible for many thousands of deaths. If someone were to kill your child or mother or brother, not of necessity, but of "choice"would you say that booing him was rude????


.....I think George Bush is pro life.....


I wish you well.


Obama's gonna kill your baby, and supports those who do it for money.


Sounds right-wing garbedly gook till you see that first ultrasound. Then it ain't so funny no more, not at all.


- Saul
.....I am in support of life.....


I wish you well.
 
  Reply With Quote
neardc is offline neardc Post #122  January 26,2009, 1:55pm
neardc's Avatar

Toodles, sayonara, and happy trails! Wishing everyone luck and love...

Power Poster

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 8,050

See profile


That was the request made of me..reading skills slipping ? and of course as you can see it was quickly removed...more hypocrisy i guess.
Ummmm....look back a page. Most likely, it was pulled by the word filter and then approved for posting by the human moderators once they reviewed it.
 
  Reply With Quote
cameracollector is offline cameracollector Post #123  January 26,2009, 6:56pm
cameracollect…'s Avatar

is not ready for Missouri summer

Virtuoso

Joined: May 2008

Missouri

Posts: 3,364

See profile










You are just as much of a problem for the planet as anyone else is,typical liberal hypocrisy..it's always somebody else's job or industry that's causing all the problems...never you or your's...i sound furious because i don't buy B.S


what liberal hypocrisy is this?


Where would you like me to start














why don't you list five things, dispassionately, and with some reasoning (not mudslinging).


Well i'm one who beleives that if the mud has something to stick to you might as well sling it.


The environment,liberals focus soley on Western(U.S) sources of pollution while ignoring environemntal nightmares like China and Russia,it's one world right ? America is one of the cleanest countries on earth,the reason for this hypocrisy is the desire to bring down western (U.S)economies in order that it may be rebuilt into something that's "fair" Al Gore's fossil fuel suckingprivate jet and energy guzzling mansion is ok...liberals love the elite...their elite of course,a wealthy conservativebusines man in possesion of such things would be evil and a threat to the planet.The general idea of this hypocrisy is that it's ok for some people to pollute but not others.


The issue of life,liberals are gainst the death penalty for guiltymurderers but want to kill the most innocent form of life we have,Doctors who have declared that putting a needle into the arm of a murderer is cruel and inhumane,but sticking a knife in the back of a baby's head inches from being born is ok.The general idea of this hypocrisy is sex has become the holy grail and anything done to do away with it's more tedious consequnces is ok,it's not life that matters,its hedonistic pleasure seeking at all cost.


The issue of wealth,liberals see nothing wrong with essentialy worthless entertainers and celebrities being wealthy,but business is evil and the only way one can become wealthy in businessis to steal it from others.They display their hypocrisy by consuming almost everything these evil corporations produce while at the same time condemning them.The general idea of this hypocrisy is that it's ok for some people to be wealthy but not others,those who earn it by genuine and lastingcontribution are particularly suspect.


The issue of equal treatment,liberals defend and make excuses for their team,any mistake,mispoken word,or outright illegal actect from a conservative is because that person is a fool,feeble minded,idiot or just plain evil,when one on their side does it,Obama's 57 states and talking to dead soldiers comes to mind,it's because they are only human and make mistakes,if it's illegal it's ok because everybody's doing it,or circumstances dictated it ect....the conservative however should go to jail for eternity.The general idea of this hypocrisy is that when liberals get their way it's right,they have the divine right of rule over others and the right of dissent when their power has usurped and taken from them...those they rule must be submissive and accept their infinite wisdom and knowledge without question.


The most recent example of this was Sarah Palin,a woman who went from house wife to vice presidential candidate,poor Hilary has been at it for years and never got that far,but because Sarah Palin is not a liberal her accomplishments mean nothing,having an unwed preganant daughter is almost a badge of honor in liberal circles and certainly no reason for criticism or disqualification,but Palin was called an unfit mother and criticised for not staying home lkie a good wife should....a balzing bonfire of hypocrisy if there ever was one.


The first amendment,liberals see the first amendment as their exclusive property for the promotion of liberal ideology,be it political or filth and perversion disguised as "Art" they have the right to speak their mind and all during the Bush administration the cry ofdissent and the right of dissent was heard across America,now that they are in power we all need to come together as one..the time for dissent has strangely passed.The fact is they are not content with the government and most of the media undr their control...that nastyrebel "Talk Radio" has to go,it's just not right for people like Limbaugh,Hannity ect to become successful exchanging ideas with people who share their veiws,it's not right,it's not liberal,it's not P.Cso it has to go.The miserable failure that was Air America proved that at least in the arena of the air waves liberals loose...liberals can never loose...the first law of the Universe.
wow. where to begin?


1) "liberals" do focus on worldwide pollution, which is why we supported the US participation in the Kyoto Protocol, which the Bush Administration revoked.


2) "liberals" are against the death penalty because it's a slippery slope once the state begins executing its citizens. "liberals" are also in favor of privacy and personal choice when it comes to reproductive rights. Most of us would prefer to see a reduction in the cases of unplanned and unwanted pregnancies, which is why we support sex ed in schools and easy access to condoms and other forms of birth control.


Many theologians and religious traditions disagree on when human life begins. I doubt you and I will resolve that one anytime soon.


3) I'm not quite clear on your argument about wealth. Are you saying we only respect wealth if its made by an entertainer? If so, you need to provide some documentation or evidence.


4) I'm not clear on your argument about equal treatment, either. Could you clarify?


5) People certainly were not predictable in their support of, or objection to, Sarah Palin. She did not, however, go from housewife to Veep candidate. That little bit about Governor of Alaska was in there, too. Hillary was also a working mother, and I condemned neither of them for their choices, especially if the First Dude is willing to be the stay-at-home parent. I didn't slam Palin about her clothing, either - I agree that someone who's going to be in the media fishbowl 24/7 needs an appropriate wardrobe.


However, it is hard to overlook Bristol Palin's pregnancy when her mother argues against public sex education. Chelsea Clinton was not pregnant at 17. Nor were either of my daughters, and I'm the most permissive parent on the planet.


6) Exactly how has the right been deprived of its First Amendment rights? Give me some concrete examples.


Mostly, what I see here is a bunch of spluttering by someone who can't express a coherent thought.


Oh, and it's *so* Christian of you to say you don't have a problem with Jews. We thank you from the bottom of our misguided little hearts.
 
  Reply With Quote
cameracollector is offline cameracollector Post #124  January 26,2009, 6:59pm
cameracollect…'s Avatar

is not ready for Missouri summer

Virtuoso

Joined: May 2008

Missouri

Posts: 3,364

See profile










An eye for an eye eh? Very Christian of you if I must say so myself.


More like, very Babylonian.


If you want to nitpick, it's actually very Jewish. But that's OK, as I don't have a problem with Jews as some of the far kook-left does.


Hammurabi wasn't Jewish.


Exodus 21:23-27.* Which is quite Jewish.* Hammurabi's got nothing to do with it and never did, making your comment a puzzling non-sequitur.


So my point stands.* It's not Babylonian at all.* It's Jewish which, again, I don't have a problem with as some on the left seem to.
Hammurabi's code also attempted to specifiy the limits of retributive justice, as did the ancient Jewish legal code.


But Hammurabi's code predated Judaic law.


That's what he means.
 
  Reply With Quote
ThePriestess is online now ThePriestess Post #125  January 26,2009, 11:02pm
ThePriestess's Avatar

It's a glow-in-the-dark compass ring, so you don't get lost.

Sage

Joined: Apr 2008

Canadian POW held in Florida

Posts: 16,023

See profile


But Hammurabi's code predated Judaic law.
And, given Abraham's origin in Mesopotamia ... perhaps exuded significant influence in this area.


But I wouldn't know anything about such matters.
 
  Reply With Quote
jamesp81 is offline jamesp81 Post #126  January 29,2009, 6:53am
jamesp81's Avatar

Veteran

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 1,398

See profile


Oh, and it's *so* Christian of you to say you don't have a problem with Jews. We thank you from the bottom of our misguided little hearts.
Here we have yet another example of a non-Christian lecturing others about the Christian faith. This is why the red states, especially the southern ones, lean red in most elections.


In internet debate, there is a widely recognized rule known as Godwin's Law, stating that if a person accuses his opponents of being Nazis, that the debate is over and the accuser loses. I think we need a new law of debate: if a non-Christian attempts to lecture someone else about the Christian faith, the argument is over and the lecturer loses.


Either that, or I start to get lecturing everyone else about the finer points of secular humanism.
 
  Reply With Quote
graceventually is offline graceventually Post #127  January 29,2009, 7:52am
graceventuall…'s Avatar

was married Nov.28, and is no longer active on this site.

Virtuoso

Joined: May 2008

Posts: 3,056

See profile



CC was not lecturing about the Christian faith, she was responding to a post that sounded condescending and patronizing towards Jews (with an order of liberal-bashing on the side).


What that has to do withthe way that some southern states voteis completely beyond me - talk about a non sequitur......


I most certainly hope that you are not implying that if anon-Christian questions you, a condescending response is an appropriateexpression of Christian faith? There is nothing Christian about that.
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“ Excellent, thank you. I think I will leave out the first part, I think it is unnecessary information to give him. I'm not interested in putting myself out there like that and it might be a little ... ” –  generallyyou

Join the “Ending a friendship” discussion

“Alfred Hitchcock - 18 Steven Spielberg - 62 *notice what?” –  dmi

Join the “War of the Directors” discussion

“ I would be "certain people" :P The issue isn't a deal-breaker, but a very strong factor preference-wise, for me.” –  ThePriestess

Join the “How much does race play in your dating someone?” discussion

“Love Texas Hold'em!.. I'm thinking of trying another tournament this summer...not sure yet though.. Never entered a tournament before, outside of online ones. Personally I prefer to play with ... ” –  Freezepop

Join the “Favorite Card Game” discussion

“Make that 3! I also had a crush on Donny Osmond. I think I still have a record or two of his. Suzie ” –  legend29

Join the “Robin Gibbs Dead at 62...How Deep is Your Love?” discussion

“Oh, my revised profile can be seen in the forum in the section where you can ask for a profile review. Suzanne” –  SuzanneScorpio

Join the “Photo Review” discussion

“Just remember, everything that you are feeling and/or are capable of he is as well. If he wanted to reach you, he could. Right now he knows that you are hurting, and that this is not what you ... ” –  lynntlb78

Join the “Can I wait and move on at the same time?” discussion

“ Yohio. And the shortened form (Anya) is nice too.” –  ThePriestess

Join the “Where is Becky?!?” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 9:08am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0