Aussie_Devilette is offline Aussie_Devilette Post #71  December 24,2008, 1:57am
Aussie_Devile…'s Avatar

is sad the weekend is over - back to workday grind for me

Veteran

Joined: Nov 2008

Australia

Posts: 1,158

See profile





Jim47,387958 wrote :


m8se69, wrote :


I'm just curious what some consider the difference between the 2. I personally don't see that there is a difference. Yet the 2 words exist. Here are there correct meanings...


Prejudice:


preconceived judgment or opinion (2): an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge b: an instance of such judgment or opinion c: an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics


Racist:



1.
a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.






2.
a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.






3.
hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.






That definition of prejudice is flawed to say the least. Prejudice means "to prejudge". By itself it is neither good or bad. It could mean merely a preference. If one preferred blondes he would be much more likely to look more favorably on a blond woman than a non-blond all else being equal.





Racism by it's definition is bad. There is definitely a difference.


Well, you'll need to take that up with Webster.


May also have to take it up with Chambers, I believe.


Prejudice: judgement or opinion formed prematurely or without due consideration of relevant issues; prepossession or bias in favour of or against anything; unthinking hostility; injury or harm; disadvantage; a prejudgement (obsolete)


(NB the "obsolete" above)


Racism: hatred, rivalry or bad feeling between races; belief in the inherent superiority of some races over others, usually with the implication of a right to be dominant; discriminative treatment based on such belief.


Neither sounds particularly nice to me. They are different, yetboth negative. One could say, for instance, that racism is a prejudice - one is a subset of the other. I say this based on the above definitions. Racism, being a belief on the inherent superiority of some races over others is a prejudice - ajudgement or opinion formed prematurely or without due consideration of relevant issues which may or may not involve unthinking hostility.


While racism can only be applied in the context of racial prejudice, prejudice has a wider application.


Does that make it any clearer?
 
  Reply With Quote
ThePriestess is online now ThePriestess Post #72  December 24,2008, 7:14am
ThePriestess's Avatar

It's a glow-in-the-dark compass ring, so you don't get lost.

Sage

Joined: Apr 2008

Canadian POW held in Florida

Posts: 16,023

See profile

omac,388446 wrote :

(a) why were the other points not racist? why did you let the ones that were favorable toward blacks slide by without calling them racist too?


seems a bid hypocritical to call one of four racist. the one that favors whites over blacks, while ignoring three that favored blacks over whites.


-----


(b) how about this, vast majority of running backs and safeties in the nfl are black. Yet whites outnumber blacks. Clearly there is an advantage blacks have in speed and agility over whites as a group, as the over representation in football in these positions would indicate. is that racist?


-----


(c) now you have to say yes it is racist, just as saying whites have higher iqs as a group is racist. if not you are being a hypocrite.


-----


(d) my point was not ill-informed and data supports it. AS A WHOLE. not individually. I can point out people who are white living in poverty, uneducated, low class, drug ridden, violence abounding, immorality rich environments. those issues are not racially limited.
(a) Omac/Zeb: "Ok, now is it racist to say as a whole, whites have a higher average IQ than blacks do?"


In comparison, the following "positive" comments regarding blacks were offered: (1) can jump higher than whites, (2) lower body fat than whites, (3) age slower in the face due to sun damage.


None of these are even in the same league as the negative association drawn. The first is a generality that isn't necessarily true or supported by verifiable evidence ... rather, it's the name of a film starring Woody Allen. The second is influenced by social and economic conditions not indicative of race. The third completely is subjective and also lacks verifiable evidence ... African Americans, as I understand, often have difficulties with sun exposure.


No reasonable person would deem these as being equivalent to the negative comment. At best they are worthless additions made specifically to legitimize crying foul. Based on subsequent statements, it would seem this is exactly the case.


-----


(b) The disproportionate number of individuals from a group in a profession does not indicate advantage or ability. Women are far more likely to be teachers and nurses ... are men not able to fill these roles? The tendency for African American youths to seek fortune in professional sports (and many do not achieve it as the availability is slim) is the product of many factors and not indicative of one race being dominant over another.


-----


(c) Something of a false dilemma, a favorite technique of Zeb's ... tells his opponent they either agree with him or they're stupid/hypocritical/ignorant/etc. They seem designed as an indirect way of name-calling.


-----


(d) Actually, it's more than ill-informed. Studies and academic papers conflicting to the conclusions are quite common. The Intelligence Quotient test receives criticism on a variety of fronts, one being its general social/economic bias. While poverty affects members of all racial groups, it is disproportionately found in minorities.
 
  Reply With Quote
neardc is offline neardc Post #73  December 24,2008, 12:29pm
neardc's Avatar

Toodles, sayonara, and happy trails! Wishing everyone luck and love...

Power Poster

Joined: Jun 2008

Posts: 8,050

See profile



Don't even bother, TP. He completely ignored the conflicting evidence I pointed him toward pages ago and he will ignore your comments as well (other than to repeat himself again, of course...lol). You can't make him understand something that he's not willing to consider.
 
  Reply With Quote
Jim47 is offline Jim47 Post #74  December 24,2008, 4:32pm

Got some serious white trash cred now! Ask me how.

Unregistered

Joined: Jun 2008

New York, NY

Posts: 545

See profile




Jim47,387958 wrote :


m8se69, wrote :


I'm just curious what some consider the difference between the 2. I personally don't see that there is a difference. Yet the 2 words exist. Here are there correct meanings...


Prejudice:


preconceived judgment or opinion (2): an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge b: an instance of such judgment or opinion c: an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics


Racist:



1.
a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.






2.
a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.






3.
hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.






That definition of prejudice is flawed to say the least. Prejudice means "to prejudge". By itself it is neither good or bad. It could mean merely a preference. If one preferred blondes he would be much more likely to look more favorably on a blond woman than a non-blond all else being equal.





Racism by it's definition is bad. There is definitely a difference.


Well, you'll need to take that up with Webster.


May also have to take it up with Chambers, I believe.


Prejudice: judgement or opinion formed prematurely or without due consideration of relevant issues; prepossession or bias in favour of or against anything; unthinking hostility; injury or harm; disadvantage; a prejudgement (obsolete)


(NB the "obsolete" above)


Racism: hatred, rivalry or bad feeling between races; belief in the inherent superiority of some races over others, usually with the implication of a right to be dominant; discriminative treatment based on such belief.


Neither sounds particularly nice to me. They are different, yetboth negative. One could say, for instance, that racism is a prejudice - one is a subset of the other. I say this based on the above definitions. Racism, being a belief on the inherent superiority of some races over others is a prejudice - ajudgement or opinion formed prematurely or without due consideration of relevant issues which may or may not involve unthinking hostility.


While racism can only be applied in the context of racial prejudice, prejudice has a wider application.


Does that make it any clearer?
Prejudice: judgement or opinion formed prematurely or without due consideration of relevant issues; prepossession or bias in favour of or against anything; unthinking hostility; injury or harm; disadvantage; a prejudgement (obsolete) (NB the "obsolete" above)


Obsolete hardly means untrue. Especially when they said the exact same thing three definitions earlier (prepossession or bias in favour of or against anything). Not to pick nits but you proved my definition with a slam dunk.


This dictionary is absolutely right when it said it could be any or all of those definitions (hence the semi-colons between them; as opposed to an "and/or" or the like).


Again, I stick with my assertion that there is a difference: racism by it's definition is wrong, bad and evil. Prejudice can, and often is, bad. But it is not neccessarily so.


If anyone thinks I'm picking too many nits gaze up at the title of the thread.





 
  Reply With Quote
Aussie_Devilette is offline Aussie_Devilette Post #75  December 25,2008, 1:11am
Aussie_Devile…'s Avatar

is sad the weekend is over - back to workday grind for me

Veteran

Joined: Nov 2008

Australia

Posts: 1,158

See profile

Jim47,393192 wrote :





Jim47,387958 wrote :


m8se69, wrote :


I'm just curious what some consider the difference between the 2. I personally don't see that there is a difference. Yet the 2 words exist. Here are there correct meanings...


Prejudice:


preconceived judgment or opinion (2): an adverse opinion or leaning formed without just grounds or before sufficient knowledge b: an instance of such judgment or opinion c: an irrational attitude of hostility directed against an individual, a group, a race, or their supposed characteristics


Racist:



1.
a belief or doctrine that inherent differences among the various human races determine cultural or individual achievement, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule others.






2.
a policy, system of government, etc., based upon or fostering such a doctrine; discrimination.






3.
hatred or intolerance of another race or other races.






That definition of prejudice is flawed to say the least. Prejudice means "to prejudge". By itself it is neither good or bad. It could mean merely a preference. If one preferred blondes he would be much more likely to look more favorably on a blond woman than a non-blond all else being equal.





Racism by it's definition is bad. There is definitely a difference.


Well, you'll need to take that up with Webster.


May also have to take it up with Chambers, I believe.


Prejudice: judgement or opinion formed prematurely or without due consideration of relevant issues; prepossession or bias in favour of or against anything; unthinking hostility; injury or harm; disadvantage; a prejudgement (obsolete)


(NB the "obsolete" above)


Racism: hatred, rivalry or bad feeling between races; belief in the inherent superiority of some races over others, usually with the implication of a right to be dominant; discriminative treatment based on such belief.


Neither sounds particularly nice to me. They are different, yetboth negative. One could say, for instance, that racism is a prejudice - one is a subset of the other. I say this based on the above definitions. Racism, being a belief on the inherent superiority of some races over others is a prejudice - ajudgement or opinion formed prematurely or without due consideration of relevant issues which may or may not involve unthinking hostility.


While racism can only be applied in the context of racial prejudice, prejudice has a wider application.


Does that make it any clearer?


Prejudice: judgement or opinion formed prematurely or without due consideration of relevant issues; prepossession or bias in favour of or against anything; unthinking hostility; injury or harm; disadvantage; a prejudgement (obsolete) (NB the "obsolete" above)


Obsolete hardly means untrue. Especially when they said the exact same thing three definitions earlier (prepossession or bias in favour of or against anything). Not to pick nits but you proved my definition with a slam dunk.


This dictionary is absolutely right when it said it could be any or all of those definitions (hence the semi-colons between them; as opposed to an "and/or" or the like).


Again, I stick with my assertion that there is a difference: racism by it's definition is wrong, bad and evil. Prejudice can, and often is, bad. But it is not neccessarily so.


If anyone thinks I'm picking too many nits gaze up at the title of the thread.




Please cite your references so they can be verified.
 
  Reply With Quote
bobjonesxvii is offline bobjonesxvii Post #76  January 14,2009, 1:54pm
bobjonesxvii's Avatar

Newbie

Joined: Jan 2009

Posts: 8

See profile



Bottom line. Nobody really cares about actual racism or prejudice anymore.


What our society has deemed intolerable is saying anything negative about certain protected groups of people. These people are identified by skin color, ancestry, income levels, sexual preference, gender, and other factors. This has nothing really to do with racism, except that the word racism is (usually erroneously) used to guilt-trip or fearmonger those who violate the above rule.


For instance.


You can say all the negative things you want about white men. This is culturally accepted to bash white males, you can find this in television shows, movie titles, newspaper articles, pretty much anywhere.


But the moment you say anything that's even potentially negative about a black man, you will be labeled a racist. Whether it's true or not is irrelevant - that will be debated, and your character will be attacked.


It's pretty unfortunate.





On a more positive note, fewer and fewer people give a hoot about this type of fearmongering. With each passing day, cries of racism are rallying fewer people, and before long, those protected classes of society will actually have to perform just like everyone else.
 
  Reply With Quote
dwreese182 is offline dwreese182 Post #77  January 14,2009, 8:25pm
dwreese182's Avatar

Pag-ibig ng isla

Veteran

Joined: Oct 2008

Afghanistan

Posts: 2,215

See profile


Bottom line. Nobody really cares about actual racism or prejudice anymore.


What our society has deemed intolerable is saying anything negative about certain protected groups of people. These people are identified by skin color, ancestry, income levels, sexual preference, gender, and other factors. This has nothing really to do with racism, except that the word racism is (usually erroneously) used to guilt-trip or fearmonger those who violate the above rule.


For instance.


You can say all the negative things you want about white men. This is culturally accepted to bash white males, you can find this in television shows, movie titles, newspaper articles, pretty much anywhere.


But the moment you say anything that's even potentially negative about a black man, you will be labeled a racist. Whether it's true or not is irrelevant - that will be debated, and your character will be attacked.


It's pretty unfortunate.





On a more positive note, fewer and fewer people give a hoot about this type of fearmongering. With each passing day, cries of racism are rallying fewer people, and before long, those protected classes of society will actually have to perform just like everyone else.
While I agree with your comment on the reverse racism, I have to say coming from either side it is wrong. Because one group has turned it around does not mean that it should be brought back by the original.


Arguing more for your side; I feel there should be a white history month and white pride should not be considered a racist comment. Everyone should be able to be proud of their heritage/race without fears of being called a bigot. I do feel that if I were to say this in the wrong group I would be labeled inappropriately. I come from Irish, Native American and Alaskan backgrounds. There should be no shame in taking equal pride with these three.
 
  Reply With Quote
Braveslady is offline Braveslady Post #78  January 15,2009, 11:06am
Braveslady's Avatar

thinks the post season is overrated anyway!

Pacesetter

Joined: Nov 2008

low ranking "brain" state

Posts: 285

See profile


You can say all the negative things you want about white men. This is culturally accepted to bash white males, you can find this in television shows, movie titles, newspaper articles, pretty much anywhere.


But the moment you say anything that's even potentially negative about a black man, you will be labeled a racist. Whether it's true or not is irrelevant - that will be debated, and your character will be attacked.


It's pretty unfortunate.

+1
 
  Reply With Quote
zana is offline zana Post #79  January 16,2009, 1:02am
zana's Avatar

-- it's hot in here --

Veteran

Joined: Sep 2008

Australia

Posts: 1,043

See profile



To me, prejudice means to be favour or to disfavour a certain person, persons, thing or things over another person, person, thing or things.


Prejudice is more like to perceive something as better or worse than something else... and that something can be animal, mineral or vegetable, or even inanimate objects or even thoughts/feelings/actions...


To me, racism means to have a negative prejudice against a whole race.... to view a whole race in a negative light....


People can be prejudiced, but not racists. But all racists are prejudiced.


OMG!! I just read the posts above and my comment shows I kinda agree with Jim47's definition of the two words!!! OMG!!!!!! I am so glad I was sitting down..... hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
 
  Reply With Quote
zana is offline zana Post #80  January 16,2009, 1:23am
zana's Avatar

-- it's hot in here --

Veteran

Joined: Sep 2008

Australia

Posts: 1,043

See profile



Concise Oxford definition of the two words in question, word for word, from my very own dictionary (which seem to belie exactly what I wrote above):


Prejudice: Noun


1a. A preconceived opinion b. (followed by against , in favour of ) bias or partiality


2. Harm or injury that results or may result from some action or judgement (to the prejudice of )


Prejudice: Verb Transitive


1. Impair the validity or force of (a right, claim, statement, etc)


2. (esp as prejudiced, adjective ) cause (a person) to have a prejudice


Without prejudice (often followed by to), without detriment (to any existing right or claim)


Racism (Noun)



1a. A belief in the superiority of a particular race; prejudice based on this b. antagonism towards other races, esp. as a result of this


2. The theory that human abilities etc are determined by race
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“ Excellent, thank you. I think I will leave out the first part, I think it is unnecessary information to give him. I'm not interested in putting myself out there like that and it might be a little ... ” –  generallyyou

Join the “Ending a friendship” discussion

“Alfred Hitchcock - 18 Steven Spielberg - 62 *notice what?” –  dmi

Join the “War of the Directors” discussion

“ I would be "certain people" :P The issue isn't a deal-breaker, but a very strong factor preference-wise, for me.” –  ThePriestess

Join the “How much does race play in your dating someone?” discussion

“Love Texas Hold'em!.. I'm thinking of trying another tournament this summer...not sure yet though.. Never entered a tournament before, outside of online ones. Personally I prefer to play with ... ” –  Freezepop

Join the “Favorite Card Game” discussion

“Make that 3! I also had a crush on Donny Osmond. I think I still have a record or two of his. Suzie ” –  legend29

Join the “Robin Gibbs Dead at 62...How Deep is Your Love?” discussion

“Oh, my revised profile can be seen in the forum in the section where you can ask for a profile review. Suzanne” –  SuzanneScorpio

Join the “Photo Review” discussion

“Just remember, everything that you are feeling and/or are capable of he is as well. If he wanted to reach you, he could. Right now he knows that you are hurting, and that this is not what you ... ” –  lynntlb78

Join the “Can I wait and move on at the same time?” discussion

“ Yohio. And the shortened form (Anya) is nice too.” –  ThePriestess

Join the “Where is Becky?!?” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 9:05am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0