jayjay is offline jayjay Post #1  April 17,2010, 5:06pm
jayjay's Avatar

...things seem to have gotten quiet around here.

Sage

Joined: Jun 2008

Brownsville, TX

Posts: 10,932

See profile

This came up in the 'Who's your Daddy now?' thread....but I thought it could make an interesting topic of its own.

Do you think a woman having the 'right to choose' whether to have an abortion or not should be accompanied by the sole responsibility to pay for the support of the child if an abortion is not chosen? If the man has no say in the decision....should he be held responsible for the financial consequences?
 
  Reply With Quote
j0hn8andy is offline j0hn8andy Post #2  April 17,2010, 5:53pm
j0hn8andy's Avatar

.....yes, she.....Sweeps past softly, without a sigh.....

Power Poster

Joined: Jun 2009

California

Posts: 5,104

See profile

It's not Right the man has no say. I've heard of cases where the man went to Court to try and stop the abortion, without success.

It's not Right anybody would try to force an abortion on anybody else. For some people, it's Right and Wrong, life and death, murder or not.

Since it's a child.....a living, breathing, human being.....I favor child support by both. Even when it's not his choice.

Life ain't fair, sometimes.

It's just Life.

j8a
 
  Reply With Quote
littlebluemonkeymind is offline littlebluemonkeymind Post #3  April 17,2010, 7:12pm
littlebluemon…'s Avatar

Unregistered

Joined: Jul 2008

Posts: 13,649

See profile

If I had a child without the express consent and cooperation of a man, I would assume full responsibility for the financial burden of that child.

That said, you can't really relate one to the other. A man "choosing" to have some say in the birth of a child would be dictating what a woman does with her own body - pregnancy and childbirth against her will. There's no way in my mind that should ever happen.

But, if a child is born, and if it is determined that the man is the father, he is fiscally responsible. There is no reasonable argument that a living child should suffer because two adults can't behave like adults.

In case you can't tell, I am pro-choice. The alternative for men, should they be concerned (and they should be) is to take every precaution available to ensure that they do not get a woman pregnant unless they intend to and it is a mutual decision. In my experience, most men leave the responsibility for birth control solely up to the woman.
 
  Reply With Quote
robv_la is offline robv_la Post #4  April 18,2010, 8:07am
robv_la's Avatar

Looking forward to another snow season

Veteran

Joined: Aug 2008

Long Beach, CA

Posts: 1,333

See profile

A guy should be held responsible for a child he helped create even if he didn't want the woman to keep the baby.

Why? Sex comes with it's risks. Even with protection, accidental pregnancies may occur.

However, if the guy honestly doubts the baby is his, he should ask for a paternity test. Why? If he accepts responsibility for the baby and later finds out it is not his, he may be forced by the courts to continue supporting the child.
 
  Reply With Quote
Sassafras54 is offline Sassafras54Advice Official Moderator Post #5  April 18,2010, 8:33am
Sassafras54's Avatar

Your Community Coordinator

Moderator

Joined: Oct 2009

San Pedro, CA

Posts: 9,088

See profile

jayjay wrote :
This came up in the 'Who's your Daddy now?' thread....but I thought it could make an interesting topic of its own.

Do you think a woman having the 'right to choose' whether to have an abortion or not should be accompanied by the sole responsibility to pay for the support of the child if an abortion is not chosen? If the man has no say in the decision....should he be held responsible for the financial consequences?
No, and Yes. Every time a man has sex there's a chance a child will be created. If he's unwilling to support a child, he needs to make sure he doesn't create one. If he's created one, accidentally or not, he has to provide a fair share of support.
 
  Reply With Quote
D_Lion is offline D_Lion Post #6  April 18,2010, 8:35am
D_Lion's Avatar

- Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Joined: Aug 2008

Posts: 31,698

See profile

The fail-safe for accidental pregnancy is termination of pregnancy, not indroduction of excess, unwanted children into the world.
 
  Reply With Quote
Sassafras54 is offline Sassafras54Advice Official Moderator Post #7  April 18,2010, 8:41am
Sassafras54's Avatar

Your Community Coordinator

Moderator

Joined: Oct 2009

San Pedro, CA

Posts: 9,088

See profile

True, but really D_Lion you cannot force an abortion on someone who doesn't want one, can you?
 
  Reply With Quote
littlebluemonkeymind is offline littlebluemonkeymind Post #8  April 18,2010, 8:50am
littlebluemon…'s Avatar

Unregistered

Joined: Jul 2008

Posts: 13,649

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
The fail-safe for accidental pregnancy is termination of pregnancy, not indroduction of excess, unwanted children into the world.
And when you are faced with the choice of bearing a pregnancy and raising a child without support or having an invasive procedure to terminate the potential life you are bearing, I will fully support your right to that fail-safe.

Until then, your choices are: no sex, definite means of no procreation (vasectomy), or accept the potential consequences when you choose to play. Women have understood this for centuries. You're responsibility does not end simply because you choose the action but do not want to accept responsibility for the consequences.
Last edited by littlebluemonkeymind; April 18,2010 at 9:00am.
 
  Reply With Quote
D_Lion is offline D_Lion Post #9  April 18,2010, 11:13am
D_Lion's Avatar

- Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Joined: Aug 2008

Posts: 31,698

See profile

Sassafras54 wrote :
True, but really D_Lion you cannot force an abortion on someone who doesn't want one, can you?

Legally, no (I am sure) - which is why the reasonable alternative is not to have economic exposure (or, a future ability to assert a right as a parent or interfere in the woman's life, for that matter.)


And when you are faced with the choice of bearing a pregnancy and raising a child without support or having an invasive procedure to terminate the potential life you are bearing, I will fully support your right to that fail-safe.

Until then, your choices are: no sex, definite means of no procreation (vasectomy), or accept the potential consequences when you choose to play. Women have understood this for centuries. You're responsibility does not end simply because you choose the action but do not want to accept responsibility for the consequences.

The maximum consequence is 50% of the "emergency birth control." That's the potential consequence for the action.

Anything beyond that is no longer a consequence of my action, but a result of her choice. As stated, I do not agree with one party creating - from their own choice - a legal liability on another party.

One birth control method ought not be legally distinct, since there is not, so far as I am aware, any that are "foolproof."
 
  Reply With Quote
littlebluemonkeymind is offline littlebluemonkeymind Post #10  April 18,2010, 11:36am
littlebluemon…'s Avatar

Unregistered

Joined: Jul 2008

Posts: 13,649

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
Legally, no (I am sure) - which is why the reasonable alternative is not to have economic exposure (or, a future ability to assert a right as a parent or interfere in the woman's life, for that matter.)





The maximum consequence is 50% of the "emergency birth control." That's the potential consequence for the action.

Anything beyond that is no longer a consequence of my action, but a result of her choice. As stated, I do not agree with one party creating - from their own choice - a legal liability on another party.

One birth control method ought not be legally distinct, since there is not, so far as I am aware, any that are "foolproof."
Possible consequences of sex = pregnancy. Possible consequences of pregnancy = a child. Choose the action and you choose the consequences...all of them, not just the ones that seem reasonable to you. Both people created the pregnancy. Both people should agree on the outcome. But, in the absence of that agreement, and in the case of a birth, the welfare of the child comes first. You consented to the possibility of (and obligaton to) a child when you engaged in sex. That's just how it is.

Is it fair? Not really. On the other hand, is it fair that a woman should base her decision on what to do regarding a pregnancy on your concern for your future financial viability?

And let's be clear here. The "emergency contraception" you're talking about is abortion, so let's just call it what it is. That's a surgical procedure. It is invasive and it comes with risk, both physical and emotional. Risk that you don't have to face.

As to your generous offer to pay half and consider it fair, I would respond that when you are in a position to have to be sedated and have a fetus scraped and vacuumed out of your insides, then paying half would be fair. Until then, you should say thank you to any woman willing to go through that to save you 18 years of child support and pony up the full cost.
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Topics
Topic Topic Starter Board Replies Last Post
Millions of men today choose not to date or get married outlaw1 A Man's Point of view 53 November 7,2010 12:54pm
Dating a single father who has no contact with his child Sabrina31 Dating 31 July 31,2010 9:26am
Who's your Daddy now? D_Lion A Man's Point of view 36 April 19,2010 2:54pm
He forgot to tell me about his "other" Child!!! Deal Breaker??? deltagurl Dating 44 February 26,2010 8:14am

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“ Excellent, thank you. I think I will leave out the first part, I think it is unnecessary information to give him. I'm not interested in putting myself out there like that and it might be a little ... ” –  generallyyou

Join the “Ending a friendship” discussion

“Alfred Hitchcock - 18 Steven Spielberg - 62 *notice what?” –  dmi

Join the “War of the Directors” discussion

“ I would be "certain people" :P The issue isn't a deal-breaker, but a very strong factor preference-wise, for me.” –  ThePriestess

Join the “How much does race play in your dating someone?” discussion

“Love Texas Hold'em!.. I'm thinking of trying another tournament this summer...not sure yet though.. Never entered a tournament before, outside of online ones. Personally I prefer to play with ... ” –  Freezepop

Join the “Favorite Card Game” discussion

“Make that 3! I also had a crush on Donny Osmond. I think I still have a record or two of his. Suzie ” –  legend29

Join the “Robin Gibbs Dead at 62...How Deep is Your Love?” discussion

“Oh, my revised profile can be seen in the forum in the section where you can ask for a profile review. Suzanne” –  SuzanneScorpio

Join the “Photo Review” discussion

“Just remember, everything that you are feeling and/or are capable of he is as well. If he wanted to reach you, he could. Right now he knows that you are hurting, and that this is not what you ... ” –  lynntlb78

Join the “Can I wait and move on at the same time?” discussion

“ Yohio. And the shortened form (Anya) is nice too.” –  ThePriestess

Join the “Where is Becky?!?” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 8:06am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0