1freethinker is offline 1freethinker Post #11  July 29,2009, 7:37am
1freethinker's Avatar

Love truth, pardon error. ~ Voltaire

Quick Study

Joined: Jun 2008

Dallas, Texas

Posts: 166

See profile

WOS, I like your spirit and your attitude. You express thoughts that most citizens should have in a healthy democracy.

There is no question that Obama "inherited a mess", as you put it. In my opinion, this country hasn't been in a tougher spot since 1932.

Although I agree with much of what you say, I don't think Clinton is completely blameless. His administration did some very good things. However, they also continued some policies, particularly monetary and financial policies, that have, in my opinion, caused a good deal of the problems we face. Elected leaders from both parties are responsible. The Clinton people were closely tied to powerful interests on Wall Street.

What concerns me a little is that the Obama people are also closely tied to powerful interests in the financial sector. To their credit, they have instituted some long needed policies to curtail the "false growth" and uncontrolled gambling that has occurred in that sector since the 1980's. Time will tell whether those policies are effective and whether this administration backs those policies by providing the resources to fully implement them.

In an ideal world, those running for high office would win or lose on the strength of their ideas and plans and not on the strength of their financial backing and ability to create catchy sound bites. I think the underlying problem is that the political system in this country is flawed, as it is too beholden to "big money". Until we divorce "big money" from the political system, we run a serious risk of every major election resulting in "meet the new boss, same as the old boss".
Last edited by 1freethinker; July 29,2009 at 7:40am.
 
  Reply With Quote
chapgirl is offline chapgirl Post #12  August 3,2009, 8:46pm
chapgirl's Avatar

Quick Study

Joined: May 2009

Los Angeles

Posts: 71

See profile

1FreeThinker, I agree wholeheartedly, that we need campaign finance reform, and we need to do something about ridding the country of lobbyists, or at least limit their powers considerably. I have been a democrat since Reagan's term. He converted me to the Democrats, but there are days that I would say there is very little difference between the two parties, and it is in large part due to the fact that they have all sold their souls to the special interests and it has very little to do anymore with what is the National interest, but has become who is going to pad whose pockets the deepest. Very discouraging.
 
  Reply With Quote
1freethinker is offline 1freethinker Post #13  August 4,2009, 8:36am
1freethinker's Avatar

Love truth, pardon error. ~ Voltaire

Quick Study

Joined: Jun 2008

Dallas, Texas

Posts: 166

See profile

Amen, chapgirl. My thoughts, exactly.

"...and the slogans are replaced, by the by. And the party on the left is now the party on the right and their beards have all grown longer overnight." ~ Pete Townshend

:-)
 
  Reply With Quote
Xman is offline Xman Post #14  August 8,2009, 5:51pm
Xman's Avatar

Newbie

Joined: Aug 2009

Ontario, Canada

Posts: 11

See profile

It's always interesting (and sometimes shocking) to listen to Americans talk about their politics.
 
  Reply With Quote
1freethinker is offline 1freethinker Post #15  August 8,2009, 9:18pm
1freethinker's Avatar

Love truth, pardon error. ~ Voltaire

Quick Study

Joined: Jun 2008

Dallas, Texas

Posts: 166

See profile

Xman, I'm curious. How are Canadian political discussions different than American political discussions? Do you think Canadians are better or less well-informed about issues than Americans? Why?
 
  Reply With Quote
Xman is offline Xman Post #16  August 9,2009, 1:49pm
Xman's Avatar

Newbie

Joined: Aug 2009

Ontario, Canada

Posts: 11

See profile

I think the average person, no matter where they are from, knows far too little about their politics - just how the governments and corporations like it. ;-) I've met folks from other countries that know more about our collective politics than we domestics do. It is a part of our culture to remain uninformed, or simply myopic choosing our own brands of prejudice and throwing mud at the other guy. If we knew the truth, I believe, we would be shocked, outraged, and dejected.

Certainly, the Canadian media and the media from Europe are more informative. I believe that media corporations have the purpose of their existences at the forefront of their functionings (i.e. PROFITS). Truth and transparency become secondary issues. That's why public broadcasting is far more reliable. I know that this goes against the (almost religious) philosophy of some, but we must remain opened minded to see beyond the prejudices handed to us by our parents and our society. Unfortunately, the time we make changes is when catastrophe strikes - usually striking the wealthy.
Last edited by Xman; August 9,2009 at 1:54pm.
 
  Reply With Quote
1freethinker is offline 1freethinker Post #17  August 10,2009, 9:58am
1freethinker's Avatar

Love truth, pardon error. ~ Voltaire

Quick Study

Joined: Jun 2008

Dallas, Texas

Posts: 166

See profile

Nice answer Xman. I agree with you. Comparing some European and Canadian news to U.S. news can certainly be enlightening. We get so much "fluff and spin" here in the US that, should you routinely watch Fox or CNN or "fill in the blank", you will be rather confused, after a while, and have a very difficult time determining what is fact and what is opinion and which facts are important. I also think that public television is worthwhile and does a better job of reporting news without "fluff and spin" than "for profit" media
 
  Reply With Quote
Xman is offline Xman Post #18  August 11,2009, 6:24pm
Xman's Avatar

Newbie

Joined: Aug 2009

Ontario, Canada

Posts: 11

See profile

1freethinker wrote :
Nice answer Xman. I agree with you. Comparing some European and Canadian news to U.S. news can certainly be enlightening. We get so much "fluff and spin" here in the US that, should you routinely watch Fox or CNN or "fill in the blank", you will be rather confused, after a while, and have a very difficult time determining what is fact and what is opinion and which facts are important. I also think that public television is worthwhile and does a better job of reporting news without "fluff and spin" than "for profit" media
Now apply that to health care!
 
  Reply With Quote
WOS is offline WOS Post #19  August 12,2009, 3:41am
WOS's Avatar

I'm for world peace and love.

Quick Study

Joined: Sep 2008

Posts: 113

See profile

1freethinker wrote :
Ok. Yes. LOL. ;-)

Seriously, most of what you say is true, I think. However, in my humble opinion, the Republican Party "lost the handle" on reality when they began to pay too much attention to certain narrow and monied interests under their "political tent" and not enough attention to the broader national interest and the exigencies of world affairs. However, that is not new in politics. The Democrat Party made the exact same mistakes during the 1970's. It is, unfortunately, a well-trodden path.
Thank you for given your opinion, that's the very thing that I'm talking about we the people need to speak up more and not just let things be. And by the way I agree with you.
 
  Reply With Quote
WOS is offline WOS Post #20  August 12,2009, 3:46am
WOS's Avatar

I'm for world peace and love.

Quick Study

Joined: Sep 2008

Posts: 113

See profile

chapgirl wrote :
1FreeThinker, I agree wholeheartedly, that we need campaign finance reform, and we need to do something about ridding the country of lobbyists, or at least limit their powers considerably. I have been a democrat since Reagan's term. He converted me to the Democrats, but there are days that I would say there is very little difference between the two parties, and it is in large part due to the fact that they have all sold their souls to the special interests and it has very little to do anymore with what is the National interest, but has become who is going to pad whose pockets the deepest. Very discouraging.
I most definitely agree with getting rid of the lobbyists it's a disgrace that they even exist. I also agree with you sometimes the parties look no different and it can be very discouraging but the more we the people speak up as you're doing now and they hear what we will and will not tolerate I think things will be different. We have power in the vote.
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply


« Happiness - Getting it | Intelligent Conversation | Being Considerate and Being Loving »
Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Topics
Topic Topic Starter Board Replies Last Post
What else is there to talk about? Jasmine83 Dating 7 June 13,2009 9:41am
Politics and Dating beatlejuice72 Dating 30 May 25,2009 12:18pm

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“It's important to understand the way a site works. Rigidly assuming / insisting that eH works likes all the others you're used to isn't utilizing the site functions to your best advantage. No.... ... ” –  Wiseman2

Join the “First contact on eHarmony, smile, questions, email?” discussion

“ If you have yet to meet, you don't know him or whether you two will form a connection. Connections formed over e-mail tend to be fantasies. You will see this echoed over and over by experienced ... ” –  shapeShifter79

Join the “How do i recoonect with him again?” discussion

“ Then it's a bit premature to worry about being friend-zoned. The first step is to go out on dates! What specific steps did you try? How many women did you ask out in person? Did you buy a ... ” –  shapeShifter79

Join the “For women to answer: How to avoid the friend zone” discussion

“ This is an old thread. She asked this in 2010. By now they are likely very exclusive or very over. ” –  shapeShifter79

Join the “is there a reason to ask if we're exclusive?” discussion

“ I'm sure he wouldn't get that. And I can't be sure that was the actual message. But it sems kind of likely to me.” –  boomer_gal

Join the “Why am I not successful?” discussion

“Hi eccemuliere and welcome to eHA.On an internet forum like eHA, you're going to get a wide variety of responses; some you'll like and some you won't. It's best to focus on the ones that speak to ... ” –  Sassafras54

Join the “Being blown off, or something else?” discussion

“ Although I have ignored my gut at times, in hindsight it's always been right, in terms of recognizing bad choices. QUOTE] But once we realize our past mistakes, we can use our reason to clue us ... ” –  eccemuliere

Join the “Is Your Gut Leading - or Misleading You?” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 5:16am.

Discussion Boards Archive

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0