Comedian is offline Comedian Post #1  November 4,2009, 11:14am
Comedian's Avatar

Matriarch of her herd

Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 2009

Colorado

Posts: 675

See profile

I had this conversation with a diehard atheist a few years ago.

Would you do the noble (altruistic) thing if there was no one there to see it?

Think up some kind of scenario like this. You are on a distant planet that has space flight. You know an asteroid is going to hit and destroy the innocent population of another planet. You could ram your ship into the asteroid to deflect it, but you might die and no one would be aware of it.

Now a Christian or some other religion would believe that God is observing and will reward your sacrifice.

My diehard atheist friend said that altruism is counter evolutionary...
Of course, both the atheist and the theist could refuse to commit suicide for an unknown population. Common sense can beat altruism any time!
 
  Reply With Quote
j0hn8andy is offline j0hn8andy Post #2  November 4,2009, 2:14pm
j0hn8andy's Avatar

.....yes, she.....Sweeps past softly, without a sigh.....

Power Poster

Joined: Jun 2009

California

Posts: 5,104

See profile

I'm not sure Noble and Altruistic are the same. My understanding of Altruism is Selflessness. Noble is Good Character.....Selflessness not required.

We've all heard stories of men who throw themselves on the grenade in their midst. I believe that to be altruistic even if there are witnesses. For that split second, they forget themselves; they just act.

Noble is doing the Right Thing, just because it is Right. Even when it costs you. Maybe especially, when it costs you.

I know I have done things for others, sight unseen, with no reward in sight. Maybe not as often as I should have, probably, but sometimes. I believe we've all done the same.

I don't know that those acts qualify as altruistic, though; I usually do it because it makes me feel good to do so. I feel good when I can help another person. We all do.

We've both been widowed. I hope you don't mind I said that. Yours many years ago, mine a year ago. Something I learned afterwards has really stayed with me. Maybe you've felt this too.

People want to do things for us. They really want to help us. It makes a person feel good to be able to help another. Altruistic? Maybe not.

But how about the person that accepts such help, even when it's something they can provide for themselves? They allow another to help, simply because it makes the other person feel good.

I guess I see Altruism in a different light now.

j8a
 
  Reply With Quote
WeDesignOurLives is offline WeDesignOurLives Post #3  November 4,2009, 3:01pm
WeDesignOurLi…'s Avatar

is 20% off this week only!

Virtuoso

Joined: Dec 2007

Philly

Posts: 2,958

See profile

Comedian wrote :
Would you do the noble (altruistic) thing if there was no one there to see it?
Morality is not contingent on no one looking. (And true charity doesn't seek recognition.) The far far far majority of moral acts we choose are when on one is looking (and when they are looking do they know you?)

And altruism is PRO-evolutionary because moral insures safety which insures the most possible evolutionary paths.

And religious people don't (or shouldn't) think that god is observing and keeping score. Religion is like golf in that you call your own fouls. That's the part that I, and most atheists, and certainly Objectivists, have a big problem with... being moral because you SHOULD be moral, not because it's your value.

And to that point I pissed off a semi-friend over this very fact sometime ago. She ran a marathon and proceeded to tell everyone she ran the marathon. When I asked her why she said it was for health and for personal achievement. So I asked her if that's so why tell anyone? If it's really as selfless as you say then why seek recognition for it? Why not get up one morning and run 26 miles and don't tell anyone?

(And yes, I do think marathons are mostly about bragging. And I have no problem with that either... the problem I had is pretending it's not a selfish act. And if I had to repeat that conversation I would just accept her implicit request to be acknowledged and give her that. )
 
  Reply With Quote
WeDesignOurLives is offline WeDesignOurLives Post #4  November 4,2009, 7:31pm
WeDesignOurLi…'s Avatar

is 20% off this week only!

Virtuoso

Joined: Dec 2007

Philly

Posts: 2,958

See profile

Comedian wrote :
Would you do the noble (altruistic) thing if there was no one there to see it?
Morality isn't contingent on recognition (neither is charity). Most moral acts we ever do isn't observed. (And in this example what's the difference if you're going to die or not... this is why leaving a legacy isn't a good motivator for me - because it's all about acknowledgement and not about your own values.)

And I don't know of any religion that teaches that god keeps score. In every religion I know you're supposed to be self-accountable to your wrongdoings (like golf) and in that respect requires the highest integrity to stay true to it.

Altruism isnt counter evolutionary but I think it is immoral to do good just because you think you should, not because it matches your own values.
 
  Reply With Quote
DennisWisconsin is offline DennisWisconsin Post #5  November 4,2009, 8:23pm
DennisWiscons…'s Avatar

Milwaukee

Power Poster

Joined: Jun 2008

Milwaukee

Posts: 5,720

See profile

It doesn't matter whether anyone was looking or not. When it comes to evolution, in the long run - excepting natural disasters - the strongest and smartest survived... in the end, it will take intelligence to overcome the ultimate disasters that the solar system and perhaps the galaxy can throw at us.

My point is that her friend's statement was correct. It is counter evolutionary to sacrifice for another unrelated genome. We are most likely driven to procreate and survive because - IMHO - our genes demand it... Only our ego would supplant that... Ego may at some point be a greater influence on evolution if it hasn't become so already....

Native Americans, Pigmies, and many, many other cultures would never pollute their environment like we are today... but at one point Europeans took over and Christianity took over, and Christianity stated that humans were the kings of the Earth and everything was here for their taking... so take we did... to the point of unsustainability... we don't see all the garbage we create because half is floating in the Pacific and half is floating in the Atlantic.

Yeah... I know... get off the soap box... sorry...
 
  Reply With Quote
WeDesignOurLives is offline WeDesignOurLives Post #6  November 5,2009, 4:16am
WeDesignOurLi…'s Avatar

is 20% off this week only!

Virtuoso

Joined: Dec 2007

Philly

Posts: 2,958

See profile

DennisWisconsin wrote :
Native Americans, Pigmies, and many, many other cultures would never pollute their environment like we are today.
I don't know what this means... the people? the gov't? manufacturing?

You can say the industrial revolution of the US caused all the pollution but it also caused the technology and science that changed lifespan from 40 to 70 in about 75 years.

Of course I, anyone, would prefer no pollution but I'd far prefer the state of health and pollution as it is right now over how it was then. The indian stereotype is that they 'loved the land' but they also didn't have much of a waste disposal system and thought 'the land' would perfectly manage itself for them and it certainly didn't.
 
  Reply With Quote
DennisWisconsin is offline DennisWisconsin Post #7  November 5,2009, 7:29am
DennisWiscons…'s Avatar

Milwaukee

Power Poster

Joined: Jun 2008

Milwaukee

Posts: 5,720

See profile

Technology allowed us to over populate the Earth... Indians were able to manage for ten thousand years....
 
  Reply With Quote
Comedian is offline Comedian Post #8  November 5,2009, 7:58am
Comedian's Avatar

Matriarch of her herd

Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 2009

Colorado

Posts: 675

See profile

DennisWisconsin wrote :
Technology allowed us to over populate the Earth... Indians were able to manage for ten thousand years....
Native Americans did not plan to keep their population in check.
Multiple causes of death and the complete lack of technology impaired their ability to significantly increase in population.
Lack of the wheel and draft animals made it difficult to bring more land under cultivation.
Less food equals less people.
They did not choose this situation as some sort of moral imperative.
The aboriginal cultures of several Latin American countries actually managed to ruin their environment.
The would denude surrounding hills for firewood and cause cataclysmic erosion.
Don't view the Native American as a noble savage.
 
  Reply With Quote
notyet is offline notyet Post #9  November 5,2009, 8:56am
notyet's Avatar

Power Poster

Joined: Nov 2008

Posts: 5,276

See profile

Comedian wrote :
Native Americans did not plan to keep their population in check.
Multiple causes of death and the complete lack of technology impaired their ability to significantly increase in population.
Lack of the wheel and draft animals made it difficult to bring more land under cultivation.
Less food equals less people.
They did not choose this situation as some sort of moral imperative.
The aboriginal cultures of several Latin American countries actually managed to ruin their environment.
The would denude surrounding hills for firewood and cause cataclysmic erosion.
Don't view the Native American as a noble savage.
+1
 
  Reply With Quote
ming_on_mongo is offline ming_on_mongo Post #10  November 5,2009, 9:17am
ming_on_mongo's Avatar

-Seattle transplant to NorCal... hmmm, sun good!

Veteran

Joined: Jul 2008

NorCal

Posts: 1,215

See profile

Really.... most of the famed "indian mounds" across the country (top) are just leftover refuse piles and the ancient equivalent of today's "disposal sites", aka "garbage dumps" (bottom).
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply
  • Page 1 of 3
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3


« Agreement is Almost a Miracle | Atheists, Humorists, and Science | Ask an Atheist »
Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Topics
Topic Topic Starter Board Replies Last Post
Ask an Atheist ANDR3W Atheists, Humorists, and Science 71 November 12,2009 7:11am
Would You Date a Christian? rocchio Atheists, Humorists, and Science 112 September 24,2009 10:16pm
Atheist Issues of the Day DennisWisconsin Atheists, Humorists, and Science 90 August 4,2009 4:52pm
Debate Potholes... TaoShaffer Atheists, Humorists, and Science 28 August 4,2009 4:05pm
"she's just not that into you [Christians]" Chapter 1 grammar_gal Romance and the Freethinker 25 June 1,2009 4:25pm

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“Yes, you are considered aged in your thirties! Next stop, early registration for AARP! I guess we can go drown our sorrows in a bottle of prune juice now!” –  emma_hazards

Join the “Free Communication Weekend” discussion

“Oh, I gotcha. I was thinking of people who meet at a party, activity, or mixer and then agree to a date. Thank you for clarifying.” –  Bluskies4ever3

Join the “It's a matter of fit” discussion

“How would I go about ending this friendship nicely?” –  generallyyou

Join the “Friend Zone” discussion

“Money isn't everything and at the end of the day, you'd have to sleep with the guy. For me, if the woman isn't kissable, she's not my type. Fact is, if you're with someone you truly love, it ... ” –  sun73

Join the “My first "Matchmaker" date” discussion

“The iPad app allows for mass archiving and mass closing. Otherwise you have to go through each individually, twice.” –  emma_hazards

Join the “Removing old matches - there has to be a better way” discussion

“Not dumping. You're going through a lot right now. I remember when my best friend from high school lost her dad. Very traumatic, so my condolences. Hopefully you have siblings and your mom to share ... ” –  emma_hazards

Join the “Photo Review” discussion

“...or he knows your general age and is just interested in a cougar. On the other hand, their are couples who have 20 yr age differences or more, and they are happy. For some age is just a number, and ... ” –  Altair

Join the “He is much younger” discussion

“Thanks! Hope you are doing well!” –  RiceBaby

Join the “dating venues” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:21pm.

Discussion Boards Archive

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0