DennisWisconsin is offline DennisWisconsin Post #11  November 5,2009, 10:20am
DennisWiscons…'s Avatar

Milwaukee

Power Poster

Joined: Jun 2008

Milwaukee

Posts: 5,720

See profile

Comedian wrote :
Native Americans did not plan to keep their population in check.
Multiple causes of death and the complete lack of technology impaired their ability to significantly increase in population.
Lack of the wheel and draft animals made it difficult to bring more land under cultivation.
Less food equals less people.
They did not choose this situation as some sort of moral imperative.
The aboriginal cultures of several Latin American countries actually managed to ruin their environment.
The would denude surrounding hills for firewood and cause cataclysmic erosion.
Don't view the Native American as a noble savage.
It sounds like there were natural checks and balances... and yes, they were a noble people... yes they also had self interest... I have also studied ancient cultures... I disagree with your final assesment.
 
  Reply With Quote
DennisWisconsin is offline DennisWisconsin Post #12  November 5,2009, 10:23am
DennisWiscons…'s Avatar

Milwaukee

Power Poster

Joined: Jun 2008

Milwaukee

Posts: 5,720

See profile

notyet wrote :
+1
-1

I guess we bring balance to the galaxy Obiewan...
 
  Reply With Quote
notyet is offline notyet Post #13  November 5,2009, 1:35pm
notyet's Avatar

anticipates

Power Poster

Joined: Nov 2008

the province formerly known as British North America

Posts: 5,237

See profile

... I disagree with your final assesment.
it's ok, dennis. you can be wrong...

again.

 
  Reply With Quote
DennisWisconsin is offline DennisWisconsin Post #14  November 5,2009, 2:30pm
DennisWiscons…'s Avatar

Milwaukee

Power Poster

Joined: Jun 2008

Milwaukee

Posts: 5,720

See profile

You think people (and I'm not just talking about native americans) had garbage prior to the 1700's? Yes indeed they did but not nearly to the scale that we have today... lol

That wasn't the OP's question, although it appeared to leave room for a wide discussion...

I'll rephrase somewhat: So would I as an atheist and an alien to another planet risk my life to save another culture?

I think that history shows that both theists and a-theists havew done it time and time again here on Earth. Living in jungles, and etc. risking the wrath of the natives not to mention disease for both altruistic and non-altruistic reasons... mostly of course non-altruistic reasons.

Altruism has been challenged many times as nothing more than a theory... but when you give your life is that the exception?
 
  Reply With Quote
j0hn8andy is offline j0hn8andy Post #15  November 5,2009, 7:08pm
j0hn8andy's Avatar

.....yes, she.....Sweeps past softly, without a sigh.....

Virtuoso

Joined: Jun 2009

California

Posts: 4,846

See profile

Altruism has been challenged many times as nothing more than a theory... but when you give your life is that the exception?
Wouldn't that depend on whether one valued their life? Some do, some don't.

But I wouldn't so narrowly define Altruism as only giving a life.

For instance, I might tolerate another's viewpoint, rather than argue. I might even allow that person to have the last word. The person might go away thinking I shared their view.

I give that person a small measure of Satisfaction. And they don't even know it's a gift; they think they've earned it.

Altruistic? Or merely a calculated expediency?

j8a
 
  Reply With Quote
WeDesignOurLives is offline WeDesignOurLives Post #16  November 5,2009, 7:52pm
WeDesignOurLi…'s Avatar

is 20% off this week only!

Virtuoso

Joined: Dec 2007

Philly

Posts: 2,958

See profile

they were a noble people... yes they also had self interest... I have also studied ancient cultures... I disagree with your final assesment.
Do you mean they thought there were noble? I don't really know what makes a culture noble except to try and give it's people as much freedom as possible.

There's plenty of folks contesting the myth of their nobility such as The myth of the noble savage by Terry Jay Ellingson.
 
  Reply With Quote
Comedian is offline Comedian Post #17  November 6,2009, 8:37am
Comedian's Avatar

Matriarch of her herd

Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 2009

Colorado

Posts: 675

See profile

It sounds like there were natural checks and balances... and yes, they were a noble people... yes they also had self interest... I have also studied ancient cultures... I disagree with your final assesment.
You may have studied ancient cultures. But I have been reincarnated several times and experienced those cultures. Darn, I forgot to take my lithium this morning. Disregard this post...
 
  Reply With Quote
WeDesignOurLives is offline WeDesignOurLives Post #18  November 6,2009, 8:55am
WeDesignOurLi…'s Avatar

is 20% off this week only!

Virtuoso

Joined: Dec 2007

Philly

Posts: 2,958

See profile

Comedian wrote :
But I have been reincarnated several times and experienced those cultures.
Yesterday I went to the doctor and asked him if he liked to study ancient cultures... he said no and I said "well in 15 minutes you'll have one of mine to study so good luck".
 
  Reply With Quote
awol71 is offline awol71 Post #19  November 7,2009, 9:14am
awol71's Avatar

Enthusiast

Joined: Mar 2009

Posts: 618

See profile

Comedian wrote :
I had this conversation with a diehard atheist a few years ago.

Would you do the noble (altruistic) thing if there was no one there to see it?

Think up some kind of scenario like this. You are on a distant planet that has space flight. You know an asteroid is going to hit and destroy the innocent population of another planet. You could ram your ship into the asteroid to deflect it, but you might die and no one would be aware of it.

Now a Christian or some other religion would believe that God is observing and will reward your sacrifice.

My diehard atheist friend said that altruism is counter evolutionary...
Of course, both the atheist and the theist could refuse to commit suicide for an unknown population. Common sense can beat altruism any time!
Here's a famous dialog (names have been omitted to protect the guilty). Now, we may disagree on who's the atheist and who's the Christian (they might well even be two atheists or two Christians), but tradition is very clear on who is the "logical" one and who is the "emotional" one.

Emotional guy: They're animals.
Logical guy: There is an historic opportunity here.
Emotional guy: Don't believe them. Don't trust them.
Logical guy: They're dying.
Emotional guy: Let them die!

Point is, I really don't think the different answers have anything to do with religion in the end.
 
  Reply With Quote
Comedian is offline Comedian Post #20  November 7,2009, 9:30am
Comedian's Avatar

Matriarch of her herd

Enthusiast

Joined: Jul 2009

Colorado

Posts: 675

See profile

awol, I don't think I understand your post.
Is it that atheists and theists can both be emotional and/or rational.
That would mean behavior is based primarily on emotion rather than religion.
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply
  • Page 2 of 3
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Topics
Topic Topic Starter Board Replies Last Post
Ask an Atheist ANDR3W Atheists, Humorists, and Science 71 November 12,2009 8:11am
Would You Date a Christian? rocchio Atheists, Humorists, and Science 112 September 24,2009 11:16pm
Atheist Issues of the Day DennisWisconsin Atheists, Humorists, and Science 90 August 4,2009 5:52pm
Debate Potholes... TaoShaffer Atheists, Humorists, and Science 28 August 4,2009 5:05pm
"she's just not that into you [Christians]" Chapter 1 grammar_gal Romance and the Freethinker 25 June 1,2009 5:25pm

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“It's important to understand the way a site works. Rigidly assuming / insisting that eH works likes all the others you're used to isn't utilizing the site functions to your best advantage. No.... ... ” –  Wiseman2

Join the “First contact on eHarmony, smile, questions, email?” discussion

“ If you have yet to meet, you don't know him or whether you two will form a connection. Connections formed over e-mail tend to be fantasies. You will see this echoed over and over by experienced ... ” –  shapeShifter79

Join the “How do i recoonect with him again?” discussion

“ Then it's a bit premature to worry about being friend-zoned. The first step is to go out on dates! What specific steps did you try? How many women did you ask out in person? Did you buy a ... ” –  shapeShifter79

Join the “For women to answer: How to avoid the friend zone” discussion

“ This is an old thread. She asked this in 2010. By now they are likely very exclusive or very over. ” –  shapeShifter79

Join the “is there a reason to ask if we're exclusive?” discussion

“ I'm sure he wouldn't get that. And I can't be sure that was the actual message. But it sems kind of likely to me.” –  boomer_gal

Join the “Why am I not successful?” discussion

“Hi eccemuliere and welcome to eHA.On an internet forum like eHA, you're going to get a wide variety of responses; some you'll like and some you won't. It's best to focus on the ones that speak to ... ” –  Sassafras54

Join the “Being blown off, or something else?” discussion

“ Although I have ignored my gut at times, in hindsight it's always been right, in terms of recognizing bad choices. QUOTE] But once we realize our past mistakes, we can use our reason to clue us ... ” –  eccemuliere

Join the “Is Your Gut Leading - or Misleading You?” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 5:21am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0