Jacquiem is offline Jacquiem Post #71  May 26,2009, 4:42pm
Jacquiem's Avatar

is glad she can still surprise herself

Community Leader Alum

Joined: Apr 2009

Washington, DC

Posts: 511

See profile

ANDR3W wrote :
Although it was not my intention to do so, It seems that i have offended you. Please accept my sincere apologies.
That's very nice, Andrew. Cute field mouse. Apology accepted.
 
  Reply With Quote
dscot399 is offline dscot399 Post #72  May 28,2009, 3:49am
dscot399's Avatar

Newbie

Joined: May 2009

Ol' North State

Posts: 22

See profile

Jacquiem wrote :
Soooo...you realize there is a problem, you recognize what contributes to the problem, and you choose not to behave differently to not continue to contribute to the problem???
......

One or the other, dude. You can't complain about how much trouble the free booty is at the same time you're out there collecting as much of it as you can. You're not going to get a lot of sympathy for your dilemma from me on this one.
You misunderstood my position on the matter and my perception of what the problem is. I ask for no sympathies, in fact I should be giving you mine. I hold the belief that "Classy Ladies" are the problem. I'm certain there will be some feminist backlash, yet I will provide a supporting narrative before ending with an analogy.

For narrative purposes, "Classy Ladies" is being used in the broadest stroke possible and automatically classifying independent professional women as classy.

In the early to mid 20th century men pursued "Classy Ladies" because there was a perceived shortage of them around. Classy ladies was perceived to be proper highly desirable women, and since there was a shortage they set the rules.

Feminism, civil rights and the general growth of equality in America happen and there was rapid expansion of education and professional growth opportunities for women.

Collectively women grabbed ahold of the opportunity, and increased their standard of living, and independence. As more and more women achieve that status there was a flood of "Classy Women" on the marketplace that fundamentally change courting.

Jump to the 21st century and the number of women who classified themselves as "Classy Women" keep increasing while the number of men who will pursue them are decreasing.

"Classy Women" think that they are entitled to quality and the marketplace should be focused on them. They are incorrect, as always the focus of the 21st century marketplace is on where the demand is (Black Men). "Free Booty" recognize this and are attempting to make the best arrangement possible to get what they want.

Just like in real estate, black love in America is a buyer's market (black male). The buyer gets to dictate terms because there are many sellers (women black and non-black) on the market.

What disgust me is that "Classy Women" think they are above the market conditions and that if they sit around pouting and crying enough that will be a favorable bailout.
 
  Reply With Quote
Jacquiem is offline Jacquiem Post #73  May 28,2009, 5:48pm
Jacquiem's Avatar

is glad she can still surprise herself

Community Leader Alum

Joined: Apr 2009

Washington, DC

Posts: 511

See profile

dscot399 wrote :
You misunderstood my position on the matter and my perception of what the problem is. I ask for no sympathies, in fact I should be giving you mine. I hold the belief that "Classy Ladies" are the problem. I'm certain there will be some feminist backlash, yet I will provide a supporting narrative before ending with an analogy.

For narrative purposes, "Classy Ladies" is being used in the broadest stroke possible and automatically classifying independent professional women as classy.

In the early to mid 20th century men pursued "Classy Ladies" because there was a perceived shortage of them around. Classy ladies was perceived to be proper highly desirable women, and since there was a shortage they set the rules.

Feminism, civil rights and the general growth of equality in America happen and there was rapid expansion of education and professional growth opportunities for women.

Collectively women grabbed ahold of the opportunity, and increased their standard of living, and independence. As more and more women achieve that status there was a flood of "Classy Women" on the marketplace that fundamentally change courting.

Jump to the 21st century and the number of women who classified themselves as "Classy Women" keep increasing while the number of men who will pursue them are decreasing.

"Classy Women" think that they are entitled to quality and the marketplace should be focused on them. They are incorrect, as always the focus of the 21st century marketplace is on where the demand is (Black Men). "Free Booty" recognize this and are attempting to make the best arrangement possible to get what they want.

Just like in real estate, black love in America is a buyer's market (black male). The buyer gets to dictate terms because there are many sellers (women black and non-black) on the market.

What disgust me is that "Classy Women" think they are above the market conditions and that if they sit around pouting and crying enough that will be a favorable bailout.

Sooooo.....

You're disgusted at women who have standards and who won't accept being treated like a part-time plaything? I admit, I'm confused by both your posts.

You complain in your first one about loose women who have no standards and who give out the booty like it's free candy. That you called disgusting and you don't even bother to court those women. No mention of "classy women" in that post.

In your second post, you point the finger at the haughty "classy women" for being too snooty to give up the booty without some kind of committment from the men they desire. Suggesting that we (alright, I'll go ahead and identify with the "classy ladies") should be glad to give up the booty to our Black brothers primarily because they are so few and have a right, conferred upon them by their rareness in quantity, to dictate to us how we ought to accept being treated - regardless of whether we get the treatment we desire or not - if we want to be "loved" by them. Only the "love" might not be actual love as in genuine committment, affection, and respect, just a stiff one three nights a week and maybe a night out at the club. Because there are so few Black men, we "classy ladies" ought to be glad we're being offered that, the market being so tight as it is.

I'm not feeling either sentiment from either post.

Yes, there are plenty of Black Man Hating clubs out here among Black women who have no interest in being any immature man's plaything, booty call, or jump off, primarily because after you've dated 6 men in a row who treat you like that, you tend to become a little jaded about the rest of the population. I'm not saying I agree with their perspective, I just completely understand - having been in the same boat myself - how they come to feel the way they do. And there are some women do sit around and whine and moan about how few men there are and how many dogs abound in the pool that exists in their area. Truthfully, some of you guys aren't cutting us any slack, either, so we're both guilty on this one. If I hear one more story about a Black man who's gone to Brazil and came back with the revelation that "this is what's wrong with Black women" I will scream. And then there is the premise behind your post - that Black women ought to get off our high horses and be glad to get ANYTHING from a Black man, because they are so few and in such high demand that it's our standards that need to be lowered so we can get what the rare Black man decides to give us. Good grief, this is awful stuff. We feed off each other's injurious behavior toward each other, and it's a vicious cycle that I wish I could break for everyone. We are all, every single one of us, entitled to be treated with respect because we are human beings. Perhaps if Black people looked at each other and identified themselves from that perspective - human beings deserving of giving and receiving respect - as opposed to being "independent women" and "eligible men" who use those identifiers to dictate how the opposite sex should be treated and treat us based on which characteristic is more prevalent in our society, we wouldn't have this ignorant, destructive, sociopathic problem.

But I can only start with me.

I am 41 and refuse to accept another woman's leftovers. I was foolish enough to have done it when I was younger, and it left me feeling cheap, used, and taken advantage of. I didn't feel lucky to have something from a man, I felt like his ragdoll that he could play with when he felt like. For you men, I would imagine that this is an ideal situation - you pick a woman for whatever mood you're in that day. For us women, it the most soul-crushing, self-esteem-destroying, dehumanizing feeling in the world. All those women who are accepting what they can get from a man won't tell you or other men that, because they are terrified to lose what little they have - that's how desperate they are. And I believe a lot men know this is how these women feel, but as long they get what they want... How that doesn't bother some men I'll never understand. But I'd rather have nothing than feel like nothing ever again. Because I know that, I would not give a good man some other man's leftovers - he wouldn't have the benefit of all I have to offer, and I won't accept less than what I'm willing to give. I am worth more than a quick, or lengthy and legnedary for that matter, roll in the hay. I will give a good man so much more than that if that's what he wants. If it's not - if all he wants is a roll in the hay - he can move on to where he can get that. Of course when I meet people, I am under the impression that they are casually dating other people. I probably am, too, until a period of time comes when we begin to feel and express deeper emotions for one another, and exclusivity is discussed. If that's not what he wants, he can continue to "just have fun" with other women, but I will not be one of those women. This is something I will have made clear from the beginning, so as not to cause any confusion and drama. This is why I like eHarmony - you can't say I never told you, a year later, that I wanted to be married - I wrote it down, it was in my profile, in the questions I answered, in my can't stands/must haves. I don't play bait and switch and hope for the best like I know some women do. I let you know from the beginning what my ultimate goals are. If I know from the beginning that these things are not what a man wants in his life, that's okay, we can move on. I won't be mad at him, and it's one less man in the way of the good man who wants the same thing I want.

None of this is femenism, which I agree has caused some serious problems in the way women interact with men in American society (I hate the depiction of men and fathers in a lot of television shows as stupid and bumbling idiots). Rather, I just see it as common sense. Do unto others...

And just to be clear, if that man happens to not be Black, then that's the way that cookie crumbles. I know some Black women have an issue with dating non-Black men; I know some Black men who don't like Black women dating non-Black men, even though they date non-Black women. Whatever. My desire for a good man in my life trumps everything else but Christian faith, and that includes race. Even though I know there are enumerable Black men out there who are good men who are still looking for that "Classy Lady," if the man I meet who wants me and a life with me isn't Black, oh well. Me and my persnickety principles still win.

As a so-called "classy lady," I don't want your sympathy, either. A little less of a disparaging attitude toward women with standards would be nice, though.

Whew, my fingers are tired now.
 
  Reply With Quote
dscot399 is offline dscot399 Post #74  May 28,2009, 10:35pm
dscot399's Avatar

Newbie

Joined: May 2009

Ol' North State

Posts: 22

See profile

Jacquiem wrote :
Sooooo.....

You're disgusted at women who have standards and who won't accept being treated like a part-time plaything? I admit, I'm confused by both your posts.

You complain in your first one about loose women who have no standards and who give out the booty like it's free candy. That you called disgusting and you don't even bother to court those women. No mention of "classy women" in that post.

In your second post, you point the finger at the haughty "classy women" for being too snooty to give up the booty without some kind of committment from the men they desire. Suggesting that we (alright, I'll go ahead and identify with the "classy ladies") should be glad to give up the booty to our Black brothers primarily because they are so few and have a right, conferred upon them by their rareness in quantity, to dictate to us how we ought to accept being treated - regardless of whether we get the treatment we desire or not - if we want to be "loved" by them. Only the "love" might not be actual love as in genuine committment, affection, and respect, just a stiff one three nights a week and maybe a night out at the club. Because there are so few Black men, we "classy ladies" ought to be glad we're being offered that, the market being so tight as it is.

I'm not feeling either sentiment from either post.

Yes, there are plenty of Black Man Hating clubs out here among Black women who have no interest in being any immature man's plaything, booty call, or jump off, primarily because after you've dated 6 men in a row who treat you like that, you tend to become a little jaded about the rest of the population. I'm not saying I agree with their perspective, I just completely understand - having been in the same boat myself - how they come to feel the way they do. And there are some women do sit around and whine and moan about how few men there are and how many dogs abound in the pool that exists in their area. Truthfully, some of you guys aren't cutting us any slack, either, so we're both guilty on this one. If I hear one more story about a Black man who's gone to Brazil and came back with the revelation that "this is what's wrong with Black women" I will scream. And then there is the premise behind your post - that Black women ought to get off our high horses and be glad to get ANYTHING from a Black man, because they are so few and in such high demand that it's our standards that need to be lowered so we can get what the rare Black man decides to give us. Good grief, this is awful stuff. We feed off each other's injurious behavior toward each other, and it's a vicious cycle that I wish I could break for everyone. We are all, every single one of us, entitled to be treated with respect because we are human beings. Perhaps if Black people looked at each other and identified themselves from that perspective - human beings deserving of giving and receiving respect - as opposed to being "independent women" and "eligible men" who use those identifiers to dictate how the opposite sex should be treated and treat us based on which characteristic is more prevalent in our society, we wouldn't have this ignorant, destructive, sociopathic problem.

And just to be clear, if that man happens to not be Black, then that's the way that cookie crumbles. I know some Black women have an issue with dating non-Black men; I know some Black men who don't like Black women dating non-Black men, even though they date non-Black women. Whatever. My desire for a good man in my life trumps everything else but Christian faith, and that includes race. Even though I know there are enumerable Black men out there who are good men who are still looking for that "Classy Lady," if the man I meet who wants me and a life with me isn't Black, oh well. Me and my persnickety principles still win.

As a so-called "classy lady," I don't want your sympathy, either. A little less of a disparaging attitude toward women with standards would be nice, though.

Whew, my fingers are tired now.
Now I know how it feels to be a politician, my words were twisted to what you thought they stood for and not allowed to stand on its own.

I did not mention "free booty" in my first post, you inferred incorrectly that I was targeting "free booty" with my comments. There is a lot of promiscuous "classy ladies". They think they have something real, and it turns out to be fool's gold.

My disgust and lack of pulling out the A game on Eharmony, is not dealing with the "free booty" those ladies are forthcoming and tend to take the lets get this show on the road attitude. My expectations are in check if I choose to continue to associate with them. My disgust/refusal to go the extra effort come from dealing with some of the 1,000's or so "classy ladies" on the site. Courting and wooing a woman is two different things, each have a role in securing a relationship. I have found that while I attempt to lay down the foundation for courting "classy ladies" are trying to woo me! At that point I simply throw up my hands and shake my head.

There was one woman I met on Eharmony who I intended to put forth A effort. She grasped the concept of courting, and before I could fine tune a plan for Wooing, things went downhill once she confessed to lying about one topic matter the entire time during our communication.

My second post states that black women do not realize that the playing field has changed. "Classy Women" was raised in an environment where they were taught to consider themselves as the Creme De La Creme, that they were the high hanging fruit. When the demand was higher than the supply the entitled attitude was deem acceptable. Things have changed though and "Classy Women" are the last ones to acknowledge this.

That is to be expected though, as nobody willingly gives up power. If you want a picture of what is happening in "Black Love" in America, what you need to do is learn about what is happening in China. What is happening in the USA with a couple millions of people, is happening in the Far East with billions. Even with different cultural subtext the two situations mirror one another.

It is Chinese tradition to praise boys. There is a strict limit on reproduction, so there are a few abortions when families learn the sex of their child is a girl. This has gone on for a couple generations now creating a drastic change in cultural dynamics.

Being the prize, Chinese men were able to get their pick of the litter among women. Now that there is 40 million more Chinese men than women, there is a shortage of Chinese women. This has drastically altered dating/relationships in China as women obtain an inferred power over relationships because there is a scarcity.

I breezed over the conditions that set up the dynamic in the black community in America in my last message. The facts support that there is simply not enough "good black men" to fulfill the quota set by black women.

Either the black woman/Chinese man adapt to the current marketplace or s/he will be sitting on a sideline looking in. I don't know about Chinese men, but it is my opinion that not enough "classy women" are willing to change.

As black women, you cannot control how black men approach dating now that you are the recipients of the shortage. Nagging a man to death (who is not your significant other) has never worked, yet that is the approach black women (collectively) take when they sit around complaining about black men.

Instead of complaining black women need to look at her sister as her competition. While she should hold on to her standards, she need to apply them liberally to the situation at hand. What applying liberally mean, the question women should ask is not does black male candidate A has trait ________, it is does candidate A level of trait _______ enough for me.

Chinese men are going to be forced to expand their race out of necessity. Eventually "Classy Women" must recognize that interracial dating is a viable option to achieve their goals. My disparaging attitude as you say will improve once black women realize what they are doing now is not working and they take corrective action.
 
  Reply With Quote
ANDR3W is offline ANDR3W Post #75  May 28,2009, 11:31pm
ANDR3W's Avatar

Enthusiast

Joined: Dec 2008

South Florida

Posts: 734

See profile

Bravo dscot399! Your arguments are very cogent and lucid. I've suspected as much, but I've never heard it laid out quite like that before.Brilliant!
 
  Reply With Quote
Jacquiem is offline Jacquiem Post #76  May 29,2009, 2:43pm
Jacquiem's Avatar

is glad she can still surprise herself

Community Leader Alum

Joined: Apr 2009

Washington, DC

Posts: 511

See profile

dscot399 wrote :
Old Fashion Courting is dead, for a couple reasons.
Promiscuous sex, tops the chart. Being that sex is readily available, that removes one of the reasons to pursue a lasting relationship.
More important than sex, though is that has been a complete 180 reversal in marketplace between blacks. "Quality" black men don't have to chase after black women, because they are outnumbered 3-10 to 1 (depending on location) by their counterparts not inlcuding the option of dating outside the race.

The question that must be asked is why would men "court" women when they can dicate the terms because the quantity/quality difference.

Honestly, I've never met a woman (20's to early 30's) who have a clue what courting is. It is so digusting, I don't even put forth the effort, especially on eharmony.
Please show me in this, your original post, where you connected promiscuous sex to your so-called Classy Ladies? I don't see it.

If you use the term "Classy Ladies" in your second post to represent women with high standards, then it only stands to reason that the women in your first post were standard-less promiscuous women who accept any kind of treatment from men just so they can have a man. I didn't twist your words - you didn't lay out your original argument very well.

"There was one woman I met on Eharmony who I intended to put forth A effort. She grasped the concept of courting, and before I could fine tune a plan for Wooing, things went downhill once she confessed to lying about one topic matter the entire time during our communication."

This is a woman who is a LIAR. Plain and simple. These women have nothing to do with either aforementioned group.

"My second post states that black women do not realize that the playing field has changed. "Classy Women" was raised in an environment where they were taught to consider themselves as the Creme De La Creme, that they were the high hanging fruit. When the demand was higher than the supply the entitled attitude was deem acceptable. Things have changed though and "Classy Women" are the last ones to acknowledge this."

"Instead of complaining black women need to look at her sister as her competition. While she should hold on to her standards, she need to apply them liberally to the situation at hand. What applying liberally mean, the question women should ask is not does black male candidate A has trait ________, it is does candidate A level of trait _______ enough for me."

Actually, every Black woman in America knows the "playing field" has changed - we all know the ratio of available Black men to available Black women is skewed in the men's favor in most major urban areas in this country. You argue that we don't, but we do. I'm a woman - I know. And we already do look at each other as competition. That's why you won't find too many professional Black women who get along - the Black man "shortage" has caused this hyper-competitive, pretentious, back-stabbing atmosphere among Black women that would skin most men alive. You look at all Black women from an outsider's point of view believing that the behavior you see is borne out of some outdated notion of importance and pathetic naiveté, but the complaining you see and hear, while annoying to be sure and completely unproductive, is actually borne out of the frustrations they feel from dealing with men who have the attitude I talked about in my post. And those attitudes come directly from some men knowing that there are 10 of us are fighting over one of you, and at least 4 of us are so desperate to have one of you that we'll do anything you ask under any conditions without much in return just so they can say they're not alone.

As far as applying standards liberally, I believe there are simply some traits that any man, Black or otherwise, MUST have to be a suitable candidate for a relationship. Everyone has drop-dead deal breakers that they will not tolerate from people, and everybody should. Because Black men aren't as plentiful in number is no excuse to minimize the importance of whatever character traits are a requirement for you from that man. Don't you require the same from women? Like not being liars? Would you liberally apply that standard? Can she lie just a little and that would be okay with you? You didn't have a problem with the one woman you mentioned because she tried to court you, but it was because, as you stated, SHE LIED. Which disqualified her as a candidate. As I said, I will not, nor should anyone with any good sense, accept less than what they desire just because they think what they can get is the best they can do. We all compromise, nobody gets everything they want, so I'm not at all advocating pursuing perfection. Rather it's plain old upholding your standards and requirements. Meet the minimum requirements, whatever they are for you, and everything else is negotiable.

I agree with you that more Black women need to consider interracial dating. My first preference is to love and marry and have or adopt babies with a Black man. But if all that comes with someone who is not, I still win.

"My disparaging attitude as you say will improve once black women realize what they are doing now is not working and they take corrective action."

Yes, looking down on people who are hurting on the other side of the problem is so very helpful in rectifying the situation. While you can't get people to change their behavior, because they can either continue to wallow in their self-pity or do whatever they need to do to be happy, you can be a little more understanding of their perspective and try to have a little more insight into their experiences in the same problem. Because it really is one problem that affects Black women and Black men completely differently, thus creating vastly different perspectives.

You have to take each person as they are and deal with them individually. It is completely unfair to apply your feelings about another person's behavior to the next person you meet, or everyone in that group of people. If you keep generalizing about how all Black women are, you'll miss out on the ones who aren't they way you think.

But, hey, you do what works for you.
 
  Reply With Quote
dscot399 is offline dscot399 Post #77  May 31,2009, 12:05am
dscot399's Avatar

Newbie

Joined: May 2009

Ol' North State

Posts: 22

See profile

You fail to realize I did not distinguish in my first post. I was speaking in general. You might not like it but all black women were lump together in my first post. Why?

To make broad based statement you cannot tailor it to fit or exclude one favored group. It is expected that will be a margin of error.

Statistics is base on taking communal data and making assumption. You can reason that Science does the same thing for a lot of stuff (Evolution, Big Bang, Extinction).

If you are the type of person who sit around crying that is not fair, you need to understand that worrying about individual results can sometimes bog down efforts for improvements. Always looking at things on the micro level, it can prevent a person from trying to grasp the bigger picture.

Reading your responses, I get the thinking that you want to sit here and argue. I'm not here to do that.

I'm here to express ideas and respond to different ones. If instead of attacking my position, you respected it as an alternate viewpoint. There would be no need for a defense, just clarification.
 
  Reply With Quote
dscot399 is offline dscot399 Post #78  May 31,2009, 12:07am
dscot399's Avatar

Newbie

Joined: May 2009

Ol' North State

Posts: 22

See profile

ANDR3W wrote :
Bravo dscot399! Your arguments are very cogent and lucid. I've suspected as much, but I've never heard it laid out quite like that before.Brilliant!
Thanks! I'm an Artist so I'm sensative about my s**t!
 
  Reply With Quote
Jacquiem is offline Jacquiem Post #79  May 31,2009, 6:54pm
Jacquiem's Avatar

is glad she can still surprise herself

Community Leader Alum

Joined: Apr 2009

Washington, DC

Posts: 511

See profile

dscot399 wrote :
Reading your responses, I get the thinking that you want to sit here and argue. I'm not here to do that.

I'm here to express ideas and respond to different ones. If instead of attacking my position, you respected it as an alternate viewpoint. There would be no need for a defense, just clarification.
Because I respond to your ideas differently from you, then you presume I'm arguing, but not doing the exact same thing you're doing - posting ideas and responding to different ones. I'm attacking you because I don't agree with you and I can express that disagreement in detail and, despite how you see it, respectfully. This sounds familiar.

And it's hilarious! We've reached the point of pouty finger-pointing. I'm done.
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“ Excellent, thank you. I think I will leave out the first part, I think it is unnecessary information to give him. I'm not interested in putting myself out there like that and it might be a little ... ” –  generallyyou

Join the “Ending a friendship” discussion

“Alfred Hitchcock - 18 Steven Spielberg - 62 *notice what?” –  dmi

Join the “War of the Directors” discussion

“ I would be "certain people" :P The issue isn't a deal-breaker, but a very strong factor preference-wise, for me.” –  ThePriestess

Join the “How much does race play in your dating someone?” discussion

“Love Texas Hold'em!.. I'm thinking of trying another tournament this summer...not sure yet though.. Never entered a tournament before, outside of online ones. Personally I prefer to play with ... ” –  Freezepop

Join the “Favorite Card Game” discussion

“Make that 3! I also had a crush on Donny Osmond. I think I still have a record or two of his. Suzie ” –  legend29

Join the “Robin Gibbs Dead at 62...How Deep is Your Love?” discussion

“Oh, my revised profile can be seen in the forum in the section where you can ask for a profile review. Suzanne” –  SuzanneScorpio

Join the “Photo Review” discussion

“Just remember, everything that you are feeling and/or are capable of he is as well. If he wanted to reach you, he could. Right now he knows that you are hurting, and that this is not what you ... ” –  lynntlb78

Join the “Can I wait and move on at the same time?” discussion

“ Yohio. And the shortened form (Anya) is nice too.” –  ThePriestess

Join the “Where is Becky?!?” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 7:48am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0