Spinoff from "Smart Women" thread: Men & the courts/abusive women/false DV claims/etc.


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Thread
Rainmaker54 is offline Rainmaker54 Post #11  February 18,2010, 10:39pm
Rainmaker54's Avatar

Quick Study

Joined: Feb 2010

Posts: 57

See profile

scarlet13 wrote :
so, post links from your "stats"

what you have is your perception of the facts. which is what we all have.
In 2006, I was involved in 173 contested divorce cases. Of that number, 96 entailed the wife making claims of domestic violence. In 89 of these cases that allegation was proven false, and in 19 of these cases the wife was the one found to have perpetrated domestic violence against the man.

In 2007 - 196 cases, 121 of which entailed allegations of DV by the wife. 106 were proven false, and in 27 the wife was found to be the perpetrator.

In 2008 - 227 cases, 152 of which entailed allegations of DV by the wife. 138 were proven false, and in 36 the wife was found to be the perpetrator.

In 2009 - 258 cases, 149 of which entailed allegations of DV by the wife. 140 were proven false, and in 42 the wife was found to be the perpetrator.

2010 - Already looking like another busy year for my firm.

My stats are in line with the stats of other affiliated firms. The vast majority of women who make allegations of domestic violence are lying, and are obtaining ex parte Orders of Protection via perjured testimony, almost as a matter of course, in order to gain leverage in the Family Courts.

This is not my "perception", this is fact..... and it plays out every week without fail.
Last edited by Rainmaker54; February 18,2010 at 10:53pm.
 
  Reply With Quote
ThePriestess is offline ThePriestess Post #12  February 18,2010, 11:22pm
ThePriestess's Avatar

It's a glow-in-the-dark compass ring, so you don't get lost.

Sage

Joined: Apr 2008

Canadian POW held in Florida

Posts: 15,919

See profile

Rainmaker54 wrote :
The vast majority of today's modern women are aggressive, power hungry, vengeful, bitter, conniving, and obsessed with the notion of becoming exactly like the stereotypical man of yesteryear - cursing, drug use, physical altercations, smoking, tattoos, able to have frivolous sexual encounters (with the availability of abortion on demand, and as a matter of solving an "inconvenience", as a back-up plan), etc., etc.
Roxxxy is reasonably priced at $7000.00.
 
  Reply With Quote
chawks64 is offline chawks64 Post #13  February 19,2010, 4:59am
chawks64's Avatar

is keeping warm with her Honey.

Power Poster

Joined: Jun 2008

Southern Nevada

Posts: 6,735

See profile

Rainmaker54 wrote :
In 2006, I was involved in 173 contested divorce cases.
And there's the problem with your perception.

If you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail. You see contested divorce cases every day. You job has you immersed in misery. What you fail to see is uncontested divorces where the couple is civil and reasonable, or thriving marriages where the people are loving and kind.

Rainmaker54 wrote :
My stats are in line with the stats of other affiliated firms. The vast majority of women who make allegations of domestic violence are lying, and are obtaining ex parte Orders of Protection via perjured testimony, almost as a matter of course, in order to gain leverage in the Family Courts.

This is not my "perception", this is fact..... and it plays out every week without fail.
Again, your stats line up with others who also are immersed in a field that sees people at their worst, a profession whose services many will never need. It's like being a cardiologist and saying that, from what you see every day, almost everyone is overweight and just moments away from a heart attack. Of course they are, or the vast majority of them wouldn't be there in the first place.
 
  Reply With Quote
scarlet13 is offline scarlet13 Post #14  February 19,2010, 5:49am
scarlet13's Avatar

no stuntman surprises or houdini like disguises for death defying escape

Unregistered

Joined: Apr 2009

Where the clouds are like headlines on a new front page sky

Posts: 10,721

See profile

Rainmaker54 wrote :
In 2006, I was involved in 173 contested divorce cases. Of that number, 96 entailed the wife making claims of domestic violence. In 89 of these cases that allegation was proven false, and in 19 of these cases the wife was the one found to have perpetrated domestic violence against the man.

In 2007 - 196 cases, 121 of which entailed allegations of DV by the wife. 106 were proven false, and in 27 the wife was found to be the perpetrator.

In 2008 - 227 cases, 152 of which entailed allegations of DV by the wife. 138 were proven false, and in 36 the wife was found to be the perpetrator.

In 2009 - 258 cases, 149 of which entailed allegations of DV by the wife. 140 were proven false, and in 42 the wife was found to be the perpetrator.

2010 - Already looking like another busy year for my firm.

My stats are in line with the stats of other affiliated firms. The vast majority of women who make allegations of domestic violence are lying, and are obtaining ex parte Orders of Protection via perjured testimony, almost as a matter of course, in order to gain leverage in the Family Courts.

This is not my "perception", this is fact..... and it plays out every week without fail.
no. post links to the statistics- otherwise you are just blah blah blah on a website.
 
  Reply With Quote
Rainmaker54 is offline Rainmaker54 Post #15  February 19,2010, 8:46am
Rainmaker54's Avatar

Quick Study

Joined: Feb 2010

Posts: 57

See profile

scarlet13 wrote :
no. post links to the statistics- otherwise you are just blah blah blah on a website.
Obviously, Scarlet you must be unfamiliar with Family Court records. They are sealed. The public does not have access, nor are the transcripts published. This is unfortunate in some respects, because if such documents were available for public review then the voting members of society could become acquainted with the situation and perhaps put pressure on the system to change. Naturally, the judges like the cloak of secrecy as it is now so the general public is unaware that the vast majority (over 85%) of Orders of Protection are granted with NO corroborating evidence of abuse whatsoever.

Furthermore, if you are inherently a doubting and suspicious person, any link posted would also be subject to suspicion if the contents did not align with your view.
Last edited by Rainmaker54; February 19,2010 at 10:00am.
 
  Reply With Quote
Rainmaker54 is offline Rainmaker54 Post #16  February 19,2010, 9:48am
Rainmaker54's Avatar

Quick Study

Joined: Feb 2010

Posts: 57

See profile

ThePriestess wrote :
Roxxxy is reasonably priced at $7000.00.
Thank you for supporting my position. So its either a tattooed, drug using, smoking, cursing, violent woman or a sex robot. Nice!
Last edited by Rainmaker54; February 19,2010 at 9:50am.
 
  Reply With Quote
lindseyk is offline lindseyk Post #17  February 19,2010, 10:29am
lindseyk's Avatar

does not believe everything she reads.

Power Poster

Joined: Jan 2009

Ottawa, ON

Posts: 6,344

See profile

Rainmaker54 wrote :
Thank you for supporting my position. So its either a tattooed, drug using, smoking, cursing, violent woman or a sex robot. Nice!
That's funny. I have a lot of female friends and none of them fit that description.
 
  Reply With Quote
LizziePooh is offline LizziePooh Post #18  February 19,2010, 10:48am

Unregistered

Joined: May 2008

SoCal

Posts: 7,705

See profile

Wow, Rainmaker - those are some eye-opening statistics. If I did the math right - out of all proven DV cases - male and females are equal in numbers as perpetrators (or slightly more females it seems).

I had no idea. I found your information very interesting.
 
  Reply With Quote
neardc is offline neardc Post #19  February 19,2010, 11:17am
neardc's Avatar

Kumbaya, people!

Power Poster

Joined: Jun 2008

Near DC (duh!)

Posts: 7,738

See profile

Keep in mind, Lizzie, that he is presenting information from a practice that focuses on these kinds of cases. It would not be appropriate to generalize to what the situation is overall (as he is suggesting we do)....

Anecdotal evidence is just that. It shows that something "can" happen, but doesn't speak at all to generalizability (i.e., the extent to which that represents the universe of cases).
 
  Reply With Quote
Rainmaker54 is offline Rainmaker54 Post #20  February 19,2010, 11:25am
Rainmaker54's Avatar

Quick Study

Joined: Feb 2010

Posts: 57

See profile

LizziePooh wrote :
Wow, Rainmaker - those are some eye-opening statistics. If I did the math right - out of all proven DV cases - male and females are equal in numbers as perpetrators (or slightly more females it seems).

I had no idea. I found your information very interesting.
Thank you. Yes, unfortunately, very unfortunately, despite what women’s advocacy groups want the masses to believe, women are more likely to become violent and abusive in domestic relationships than men are. While it is true that because of sheer size and strength, the men who do become violent can inflict more serious injury than women up to a point (knives and guns are equalizers), the fact seen in the trenches is that more often than not, men are the victims of abuse, as defined by the law and as defined by the women’s advocacy group’s own hand-out materials. And just as importantly, woman are MUCH more likely to undermine and tax the judicial system with a stream of false allegation cases. In fact, last year my office caught three different women’s advocacy groups actually advising woman to lie about being abused in order to get the non-abusing spouse out of the house with an Order of Protection. And these are the same women’s groups that are spreading the blatant lie that 1/3 of married women are being domestically abused in order to create mass hysteria, and funding for their organizations. It’s really pretty sickening. In the end, such groups are actually going to ruin it for women who genuinely are being abused, because eventually there will be a backlash in the courts as men stand up for their rights and start suing organizations that promote defamation of character.
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“It's important to understand the way a site works. Rigidly assuming / insisting that eH works likes all the others you're used to isn't utilizing the site functions to your best advantage. No.... ... ” –  Wiseman2

Join the “First contact on eHarmony, smile, questions, email?” discussion

“ If you have yet to meet, you don't know him or whether you two will form a connection. Connections formed over e-mail tend to be fantasies. You will see this echoed over and over by experienced ... ” –  shapeShifter79

Join the “How do i recoonect with him again?” discussion

“ Then it's a bit premature to worry about being friend-zoned. The first step is to go out on dates! What specific steps did you try? How many women did you ask out in person? Did you buy a ... ” –  shapeShifter79

Join the “For women to answer: How to avoid the friend zone” discussion

“ This is an old thread. She asked this in 2010. By now they are likely very exclusive or very over. ” –  shapeShifter79

Join the “is there a reason to ask if we're exclusive?” discussion

“ I'm sure he wouldn't get that. And I can't be sure that was the actual message. But it sems kind of likely to me.” –  boomer_gal

Join the “Why am I not successful?” discussion

“Hi eccemuliere and welcome to eHA.On an internet forum like eHA, you're going to get a wide variety of responses; some you'll like and some you won't. It's best to focus on the ones that speak to ... ” –  Sassafras54

Join the “Being blown off, or something else?” discussion

“ Although I have ignored my gut at times, in hindsight it's always been right, in terms of recognizing bad choices. QUOTE] But once we realize our past mistakes, we can use our reason to clue us ... ” –  eccemuliere

Join the “Is Your Gut Leading - or Misleading You?” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 7:20am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0