Advice and Support from Thousands of Users Just Like You

Atheists, Humorists, and Science Milky Way Galaxy as seen from New Mexico...

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
DennisWisconsin's Avatar

DennisWisconsin Heading to Davenport, IA

Virtuoso

Join Date: Jun 2008

Posts: 4,710

See profile

Comedian wrote :
Native Americans did not plan to keep their population in check.
Multiple causes of death and the complete lack of technology impaired their ability to significantly increase in population.
Lack of the wheel and draft animals made it difficult to bring more land under cultivation.
Less food equals less people.
They did not choose this situation as some sort of moral imperative.
The aboriginal cultures of several Latin American countries actually managed to ruin their environment.
The would denude surrounding hills for firewood and cause cataclysmic erosion.
Don't view the Native American as a noble savage.
It sounds like there were natural checks and balances... and yes, they were a noble people... yes they also had self interest... I have also studied ancient cultures... I disagree with your final assesment.
- November 5th, 2009, 11:20 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#11   Reply With Quote
DennisWisconsin's Avatar

DennisWisconsin Heading to Davenport, IA

Virtuoso

Join Date: Jun 2008

Posts: 4,710

See profile

notyet wrote :
+1
-1

I guess we bring balance to the galaxy Obiewan...
- November 5th, 2009, 11:23 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#12   Reply With Quote
notyet's Avatar

notyet it's alive!

Virtuoso

Join Date: Nov 2008

Posts: 3,209

See profile

... I disagree with your final assesment.
it's ok, dennis. you can be wrong...

again.

<):-D
- November 5th, 2009, 02:35 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#13   Reply With Quote
DennisWisconsin's Avatar

DennisWisconsin Heading to Davenport, IA

Virtuoso

Join Date: Jun 2008

Posts: 4,710

See profile

You think people (and I'm not just talking about native americans) had garbage prior to the 1700's? Yes indeed they did but not nearly to the scale that we have today... lol

That wasn't the OP's question, although it appeared to leave room for a wide discussion...

I'll rephrase somewhat: So would I as an atheist and an alien to another planet risk my life to save another culture?

I think that history shows that both theists and a-theists havew done it time and time again here on Earth. Living in jungles, and etc. risking the wrath of the natives not to mention disease for both altruistic and non-altruistic reasons... mostly of course non-altruistic reasons.

Altruism has been challenged many times as nothing more than a theory... but when you give your life is that the exception?
- November 5th, 2009, 03:30 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#14   Reply With Quote
j0hn8andy's Avatar

j0hn8andy .....Take off the Rings.....That's the Goal.....

Enthusiast

Join Date: Jun 2009

Posts: 941

See profile

Altruism has been challenged many times as nothing more than a theory... but when you give your life is that the exception?
Wouldn't that depend on whether one valued their life? Some do, some don't.

But I wouldn't so narrowly define Altruism as only giving a life.

For instance, I might tolerate another's viewpoint, rather than argue. I might even allow that person to have the last word. The person might go away thinking I shared their view.

I give that person a small measure of Satisfaction. And they don't even know it's a gift; they think they've earned it.

Altruistic? Or merely a calculated expediency?

j8a
- November 5th, 2009, 08:08 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#15   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

WeDesignOurLives's Avatar

WeDesignOurLives is 20% off this week only!

Veteran

Join Date: Dec 2007

Posts: 2,152

See profile

they were a noble people... yes they also had self interest... I have also studied ancient cultures... I disagree with your final assesment.
Do you mean they thought there were noble? I don't really know what makes a culture noble except to try and give it's people as much freedom as possible.

There's plenty of folks contesting the myth of their nobility such as The myth of the noble savage by Terry Jay Ellingson.
- November 5th, 2009, 08:52 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#16   Reply With Quote
Comedian's Avatar

Comedian is busy with out-of-town company

Pacesetter

Join Date: Jul 2009

Posts: 376

See profile

It sounds like there were natural checks and balances... and yes, they were a noble people... yes they also had self interest... I have also studied ancient cultures... I disagree with your final assesment.
You may have studied ancient cultures. But I have been reincarnated several times and experienced those cultures. Darn, I forgot to take my lithium this morning. Disregard this post...
- November 6th, 2009, 09:37 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#17   Reply With Quote
WeDesignOurLives's Avatar

WeDesignOurLives is 20% off this week only!

Veteran

Join Date: Dec 2007

Posts: 2,152

See profile

Comedian wrote :
But I have been reincarnated several times and experienced those cultures.
Yesterday I went to the doctor and asked him if he liked to study ancient cultures... he said no and I said "well in 15 minutes you'll have one of mine to study so good luck".
- November 6th, 2009, 09:55 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#18   Reply With Quote
awol71's Avatar

Quick Study

Join Date: Mar 2009

Posts: 232

See profile

Comedian wrote :
I had this conversation with a diehard atheist a few years ago.

Would you do the noble (altruistic) thing if there was no one there to see it?

Think up some kind of scenario like this. You are on a distant planet that has space flight. You know an asteroid is going to hit and destroy the innocent population of another planet. You could ram your ship into the asteroid to deflect it, but you might die and no one would be aware of it.

Now a Christian or some other religion would believe that God is observing and will reward your sacrifice.

My diehard atheist friend said that altruism is counter evolutionary...
Of course, both the atheist and the theist could refuse to commit suicide for an unknown population. Common sense can beat altruism any time!
Here's a famous dialog (names have been omitted to protect the guilty). Now, we may disagree on who's the atheist and who's the Christian (they might well even be two atheists or two Christians), but tradition is very clear on who is the "logical" one and who is the "emotional" one.

Emotional guy: They're animals.
Logical guy: There is an historic opportunity here.
Emotional guy: Don't believe them. Don't trust them.
Logical guy: They're dying.
Emotional guy: Let them die!

Point is, I really don't think the different answers have anything to do with religion in the end.
- November 7th, 2009, 10:14 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#19   Reply With Quote
Comedian's Avatar

Comedian is busy with out-of-town company

Pacesetter

Join Date: Jul 2009

Posts: 376

See profile

awol, I don't think I understand your post.
Is it that atheists and theists can both be emotional and/or rational.
That would mean behavior is based primarily on emotion rather than religion.
- November 7th, 2009, 10:30 am
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#20   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“I don't see libel here. You may have grounds to contest the accuracy of the opinion.” – nightling

Join the “Defamation/Libel” discussion

“Give us your fax number and we'll fax in our income tax for 2009! Let's put it this way, 80% of jobs lost are jobs guys had. Yet no man will admit he's hurting on an online dating website. If ... ” – roguewolf1

Join the “where men are financially now” discussion

“Surprisingly candid and real responses. Thanks! I wonder if someone religious will join in and tell an alternative view - and tell how they lived abstinence in their life - and how it make their ... ” – Wonderwoman402

Join the “Gods will and sex vs abstinence for older folks” discussion

“An intersting situation arose today that has me stuck. She was a FCW'er. She sent her "real" email address to me very early on, just in case we didn't make it to OC. We did eventually make it ... ” – ScottK

Join the “FCW - Interesting Problem” discussion

“He likes you very much. He might of asked you about the vacation because he wanted to date you during that time. If you like him, maybe you can be low key and ask him out on a low stress date? ... ” – roguewolf1

Join the “i have a problem understanding this guy!” discussion

“There is that old saying that came up, when I was reading about your problem, " You are known by the company you keep." My dad was famous for saying that line. To me, it means, that if you are ... ” – beautifulgenius

Join the “Friendship Question: What do you do if you've come to the conclusion that all your friends are cheaters?” discussion

“Why can't you talk to the girl the way yo do her sister? What would be wrong with that?I've said it before, but I will say it again just to be annoyingly helpful. The only way you're going to succeed ... ” – nightling

Join the “Dating and insecurity” discussion

“I don't see any post in this thread that would give anyone that idea. ” – nightling

Join the “Ethical Considerations In Dating Multiple People” discussion



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:47 pm.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0