Thoughts on election

first i appreciate your honesty, but i would like to go into the specifics of what you said. please comment.

before i get into it i wanted to say something about the parties. they are like axis in wwII japan and germany were not really allies, they just had the same enemies, same with usa/england and communist russia. if you really want a party honest to their values and not just winning, you want to join a special interest. for example if you want to protect your 2nd amendment rights join the nra. they don't sell in to what candidates say, and they hold them accountable for their records. not only that but they will vote republican or democrat just on their values. sadly i have yet to find a christian special interest group that is honest to their ideals, meaning you have to personally dig up these peoples records if you can.


"I hate the hypocracy of those who claim to be "conservative" and laugh about executing a woman who converted to Christ (Geo W. Bush) "

the more i think about it the more i think you are ether a sick sadistic petty, or alternatively, naive person if you fail to smile at this. first naive. be honest, how many people would claim to be christian if it would get off of death row or worse a get out of jail card for converting? how many of them would truly change/convert? you know you can't make christianity any form of a get out of jail free card. now to the sadistic part. you know i can't help but smile to think of my sister. (for i truly hope sister she is.) she is no longer caged like an animal, she no longer lives without hope of seeing a sky that isn't framed between four concrete walls, no she is free, i'm a soul sleeper myself, but even i smile to think that the next thing she knows she will be in our Fathers arms. yet you want a human to be penned up in a cage, no hope of ever being free. doomed to grow old and die of old age trapped in a room to witch she will never own the key. reasonable odds that for the next fifty or sixty years she would not even get too own a pencil or pen. trapped with people who can and are not unwilling to kill some one should they ever get a few sheets of newspaper. you want her to suffer through all that when heaven waits. for the unbeliever, i understand your position, even max security containment is immensely preferable to hell. but for what do you want her to suffer? no amount of pain on her part can ever bring her victim back, why not send her to the life were what she did does not matter? true, i am in favor of death sentences. i don't see why we locking humans up in cages until they eventually die is preferable to putting them out of their misery (though i do see giving them a relitivly long appeals process). i don't see why we want to spend money keeping them in these cages when we could spend it on other programs such as public health, or orphanages to save lives, help keep people healthy, or care for the needy. under funding takes the lives of people and lowers their standard of living. just keeping one human caged for ten years will take more money than it would take to save lives.... yet you seem to want people locked in cages rather than helping people who at the least have not been convicted of any crime as great as your prisoners. i am tiered of the hypocrisies of your side. you deny the afterlife, call Jesus a lier (for what els is it if you believe that being locked in a cage is better than the afterlife for a christian?) and cry mercy when all you want is mercy on your self because you would rather someone suffer than think about someone dieing that you know of, never mind that estimates indicate that globally you kill tens to thousands of children every day just on the off chance you might be saving some birds, yes that irritates me. admit ably some dems. are against the last bit.

for the government, and the wars, clearly we have varying views of the democrats involvement in particular. i will admit that i take issue with much of what the republicans do do. simply in the issues i mentioned i have rarely seen a democrat who was a lesser evil to his republican counter part. in those few occasions i voted dem.(i can only think of one but then my voting record is not two deep, nor is it public record for me to get an exact count.)

'claim to be fair minded people yet keep playing the political game n teh dirtiest way possible (claiming Obama is not Christian or that he hates the US or pals around with terrorists, those are just lies and yet people belive them); '

your honestly telling me that democrats never do any of that? honestly? and you want to blaim the republicans for what every person who doesn't like obabama says? for every prank email? what any troll might post? i can see getting offended when an actual republican says something without adequate fact checking, but honestly the dems. do it too, as does most everyone. further your argument assumes that the republicans are united, organized, and in enough control of their membership that they all believe the exact same things, never do anything that the republican concensis does not like, and no one ever does anything in the republicans name without republican approval. by the same logic you want all religious people to be persecuted because i met democrats who want the marriage license of any one who put down a religion to be revoked/and or killed. lets be honest the reps and dems both have their share of nuts....

"lie to the American people about why we went to war in Iraq and are never called on to be honest"

given the people i have talked with, and my personal knowledge of the 'third world' and the black market, i have to say that you simply are much more incorrect than you think. but then why get into the best way to dump weapons on a global scale? mind you i think the war is handled very wrong, but sadly it is politically necessary... but then getting in to this would mostly involve history lessons and the best methods of conducting guerrilla warfare, noting the collisions that these things must inevitably have with more leftist world views. interesting but rarely a productive conversation.

'claim to love the USA and yet they ruin parts of our God inspired Constitution and again are never called to task on it'

curious, what exactly are you talking about?

'But, it's the lesser of evils.'

so for you some odd thousand abortions per day are out weighed by the deaths of a comparatively small number of inmates.

democratic bloat-government is less than republican bloat-government, surprising given the socialist leanings of the left....

you seem to feel political rantings are a largely republican phenomenon, that they have full control of all their members, and can keep people from speaking out in their name, and it is worthy to be considered a serious issue.

the only one that makes sense to me is the war bit, and on that, we just have too vast a difference in experience for me to ever see the world working the way you think it does, and you probably just can't accept my views on it.