"You may be missing that special someone because they live 31 miles away!"
The article is wrong. When I choose 30 miles, eHarmony still sends me matches from towns 45 miles away (aerial). When I chose 60 miles, I still got matched with someone 70 miles away!
Has anyone else here have the same experience?
I forgot to add that I also set the Match Flexibility: Distance to the highest "Very Important" setting. I still got matches from beyond the 30/60 miles I have set. The article is wrong.
"You may be missing that special someone because they live 31 miles away!"
The article is wrong. When I choose 30 miles, eHarmony still sends me matches from towns 45 miles away (aerial). When I chose 60 miles, I still got matched with someone 70 miles away!
Has anyone else here have the same experience?
I forgot to add that I also set the Match Flexibility: Distance to the highest "Very Important" setting. I still got matches from beyond the 30/60 miles I have set. The article is wrong.
Has anyone here have the same experience?
Yes, I have. I decided to do a little experiement yesterday and take my mileage preferences off for one day to see what would happen. I got one new match overnight, from about 400 miles away, and he immediately closed me for the "physical distance is too great" reason. So much for that experiment!
There are two metropolitan areas within 60 miles of me. In two months on eH, I have yet to receive a single match from either one. It seems that all the matches are from suburban and rural areas; many of them near 100 miles away. What gives? Any ideas?
Wow, it sucks that you guys are having problems getting matches. I get like 8 to 10 a day and it is really overwhelming b/c many of them are "dead guys"- you know the ones that are trials or non paying members. So, I have all these seeminly great matches that don't exist. I don't think distance has much to do this with. I still get matches from hundreds and hundredsof miles away when I havce my settings to 120 miles.
8 to 10 a day? That would actually be worth how much this place costs. Like I said, maybe 3-4 a week for me. So figure about 16 a month, and maybe 1 or 2 of them may actually pay for their subscription.
In the first year that I was a member, I recieved about 1200 matches. In the last 4 months, I have received about 100. Now, maybe it is just me, but those number don't even seem ballpark close.
One curious thing, that I have found now. Every one of my matches is a very firm beleiver in the Christian faith, or so the profiles indicate, whereas I previously was matched with non-Christians (which is fine by me). I checked my settings, and have nothing checked to indicate that I want to be matched only with those with the Christian faith. Anyone else having a similar thing happen?
It definitely comes and goes. It does seem like a matter of trial and error, but even then it doesn't seem to deliver a perfect number of matches that all live just the right amount of time. It seems like their are too many factors involved. I rarely get matches that live in the same city as myself, which I assume is not because there aren't any single women, but that there aren't many registered on here or that I would overly compatible with. I really don't quantify the number of matches I get every week nor do I like counting them like we're talking about fishing or the number of pennies foud in weekly in parking lot since I may close out some and they will close me out, etc.
Hmmm.....I already knew everything from this article. Still not getting more matches. Should I get a prize or something? [img]library/editor/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-money-mouth.gif[/img]
Whenever I read posts complaining about the price of eHarmony, I get a chuckle. Before I joined eHarmony, I was a member of another dating service (not an online one) that had a one-year membership fee of $1,500. And that only guaranteed you 14 first dates.
Now before you get all excited and go, "Well at least you get to meet people!" keep in mind that the vast majority of matches never lead to a second date much less a long-term relationship. In fact, I'd consider you lucky if you met even a handful of matches with whom there was mutual interest in a second date.
That said, I did meet someone through this other service that I dated for about four months. Unfortunately it ended up being a complete disaster. Sure there was plenty of chemistry to keep things interesting at first, but the total lack of compatibility eventually caused the whole thing to implode. Despite what this other service promised, they did not get to know me well enough to know what worked for me and what didn't.
Yes, I have. I decided to do a little experiement yesterday and take my mileage preferences off for one day to see what would happen. I got one new match overnight, from about 400 miles away, and he immediately closed me for the "physical distance is too great" reason. So much for that experiment!
The heck? You gave up after only one match? Why not give the experiment some more time and see what happens?
The tennis ball story is a good analogy, RD, and that's how I interpret "gut feeling" -- a conclusion/sense of something that's a thought, not a feeling; though it will have feelings associated with ... –
Sassafras54
Agree. Given where you are emotionally, I would cease all communication with Mr. Trade Show. You're vulnerable. He's up for a challenge. It's playing with fire. You'll be in a bad place in the ... –
emma_hazards
I have never spoken to a woman like he has.
Yeah, I have never spoken to a woman like that either.
It is a hard call to whether he is just as jerk, or whether he is a player.
Both are feasible ... –
ScottK
Harmonygirl,
I do not usually make up my mind on blanket situations but instead would examine each one on it's own merits, so I cannot answer your question. However, just in the going about of daily ... –
Ephemera
I was ok until the kiss on the cheek part....That doesn't sound like your defenses were up at all...
It's one thing for a guy to walk up and start with the cheesy lines....But as soon as I say, "no ... –
Ingytravel
No. It is not wise.
You have to throw all your eggs into one basket for love to work at all. Relationships are inherently riskier than careers. You can't use the same rules.
You might lose ... –
harnomygirl
Do you have something completely stupid to talk about? Come here. Talk. It's a simple two step process. Please have a good sense of humor about all this. It is good for the heart.
"Interests: Gardening, Cooking, Baking, The Gym, Going For Walks With My Daughter, Bubble Baths, Red Wine, Dark Beer, Funny Stories And Quirky Movies." View profile
Quick Study
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 161
See profile
Newbie
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1
See profile
was married Nov.28, and is no longer active on this site.
Virtuoso
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,056
See profile
venturing back here after a few years....
Quick Study
Joined: Feb 2008
Lancaster, PA
Posts: 209
See profile
Quick Study
Joined: May 2008
Charlotte, NC
Posts: 223
See profile
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2008
Anaheim
Posts: 998
See profile
Pacesetter
Joined: Feb 2008
Texas
Posts: 311
See profile
Kobe Umeda on FaceBook Prefers the ugly truth to beautiful lies.
Virtuoso
Joined: Jan 2008
On a farm on an island in the Orient
Posts: 3,087
See profile
Quick Study
Joined: Jun 2008
Minnesota
Posts: 121
See profile
Quick Study
Joined: Jun 2008
Minnesota
Posts: 121
See profile
Looking for a Great Relationship?
Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.
Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards
The tennis ball story is a good analogy, RD, and that's how I interpret "gut feeling" -- a conclusion/sense of something that's a thought, not a feeling; though it will have feelings associated with ... – Sassafras54
Join the Is Your Gut Leading - or Misleading You? discussion
Agree. Given where you are emotionally, I would cease all communication with Mr. Trade Show. You're vulnerable. He's up for a challenge. It's playing with fire. You'll be in a bad place in the ... – emma_hazards
Join the Received lovely email from former poofer discussion
How about phone calls, then? – barbarella_42
Join the Advice on Response time discussion
I have never spoken to a woman like he has. Yeah, I have never spoken to a woman like that either. It is a hard call to whether he is just as jerk, or whether he is a player. Both are feasible ... – ScottK
Join the So, men. Explain this to me, please! discussion
I have come to this same conclusion. Thank you. – bibittyboo
Join the Confused about date #2 discussion
Harmonygirl, I do not usually make up my mind on blanket situations but instead would examine each one on it's own merits, so I cannot answer your question. However, just in the going about of daily ... – Ephemera
Join the Atheism, Religion and Tolerance discussion
I was ok until the kiss on the cheek part....That doesn't sound like your defenses were up at all... It's one thing for a guy to walk up and start with the cheesy lines....But as soon as I say, "no ... – Ingytravel
Join the So this guy walks into a bar . . . discussion
No. It is not wise. You have to throw all your eggs into one basket for love to work at all. Relationships are inherently riskier than careers. You can't use the same rules. You might lose ... – harnomygirl
Join the Becoming Exclusive discussion