pengin is offline pengin Post #1  December 29,2010, 8:01pm
pengin's Avatar

Quick Study

Joined: Aug 2010

Posts: 66

See profile

I have a few random questions about eHarmony and this forum.

1. Is there a standard timeframe for responding to someone's message on any of the guided communication or open communication steps? For instance, if someone sends me a message and I respond within two hours do I seem desperate? If I wait two days, does it seem like I don't care to communicate?

2. Has anyone else noticed that most people in these forums that discuss their lack of success on eHarmony are really good at math? It's been a while but I actually remember someone posted that only 7% of his matches were real matches. And of those only 13% would make it all the way to open communication. Who pays that much attention to those details? Of course when I questioned him on this, he gave me some details and I had to correct his math...17 out of 204 matches is actually 7.76% and 2 out of 17 is 11.8%.

3. Are there any first round questions or Must Have/Can't Stands that are immediate deal breakers? I know everyone has their own turn ons and turn offs but I'm looking more for the common ones. I think the question about willingness to relocate are pretty much turn offs. It feels like asking someone to leave their home to be closer to you on the first date.

4. Finally, what's the funniest thing you've read on someone's profile?
 
  Reply With Quote
sony12 is offline sony12 Post #2  December 29,2010, 8:16pm
sony12's Avatar

Veteran

Joined: Jan 2010

Posts: 1,958

See profile

pengin wrote :
I have a few random questions about eHarmony and this forum.

1. Is there a standard timeframe for responding to someone's message on any of the guided communication or open communication steps? For instance, if someone sends me a message and I respond within two hours do I seem desperate? If I wait two days, does it seem like I don't care to communicate?

2. Has anyone else noticed that most people in these forums that discuss their lack of success on eHarmony are really good at math? It's been a while but I actually remember someone posted that only 7% of his matches were real matches. And of those only 13% would make it all the way to open communication. Who pays that much attention to those details? Of course when I questioned him on this, he gave me some details and I had to correct his math...17 out of 204 matches is actually 7.76% and 2 out of 17 is 11.8%.

3. Are there any first round questions or Must Have/Can't Stands that are immediate deal breakers? I know everyone has their own turn ons and turn offs but I'm looking more for the common ones. I think the question about willingness to relocate are pretty much turn offs. It feels like asking someone to leave their home to be closer to you on the first date.

4. Finally, what's the funniest thing you've read on someone's profile?
1. In many cases people who have a high interest level will respond within 24 hours (if you choose to wait longer then that your matches will likely start concentrating on other people). Don't worry about responding to quickly.

2. Don't pay attention to many of the negative statistics that people try to dish out on here. In many cases they are just trying to give themselves an excuse as to why they havn't had very much success on eharmony.

3. The thing you most need to keep an eye out for is negativity.
 
  Reply With Quote
mitchell175 is offline mitchell175 Post #3  December 30,2010, 8:44am
mitchell175's Avatar

mixing metaphors in a mellifluous melange of malapropisms

Power Poster

Joined: Oct 2010

Boston, MA... or thereabouts

Posts: 6,394

See profile

pengin wrote :
2. Has anyone else noticed that most people in these forums that discuss their lack of success on eHarmony are really good at math? It's been a while but I actually remember someone posted that only 7% of his matches were real matches. And of those only 13% would make it all the way to open communication. Who pays that much attention to those details? Of course when I questioned him on this, he gave me some details and I had to correct his math...17 out of 204 matches is actually 7.76% and 2 out of 17 is 11.8%.
I have not actually done the math, but scientifically, I would have to say my results have been "crappy".

3. Are there any first round questions or Must Have/Can't Stands that are immediate deal breakers? I know everyone has their own turn ons and turn offs but I'm looking more for the common ones. I think the question about willingness to relocate are pretty much turn offs. It feels like asking someone to leave their home to be closer to you on the first date.
I don't know about deal breakers, but I had to question the guy who sent me the Round 1 question about how do I feel about traditional gender roles in a marriage/relationship? Why would you ask that, unless you expect a little woman to stay home and cook your meals and raise your kids?

4. Finally, what's the funniest thing you've read on someone's profile?
Again, that same guy above who said things like "Foo on eHarmony for telling me I can't choose my parents as the most influential people!"
Foo?? Then later, in OC, he asked me if I like to go to "the cinema". Not "the movies". Sorry, I had to close him.
My replies above in blue.
 
  Reply With Quote
SearchingHoping is offline SearchingHoping Post #4  December 30,2010, 9:13am
SearchingHopi…'s Avatar

is procratisnating when the green light is on...

Pacesetter

Joined: Dec 2010

Posts: 465

See profile

pengin wrote :

1. Is there a standard timeframe for responding to someone's message on any of the guided communication or open communication steps? For instance, if someone sends me a message and I respond within two hours do I seem desperate? If I wait two days, does it seem like I don't care to communicate?
I would recommend following your level your interest, if you are highly interested, respond right away. Honesty trumps games -- always.

pengin wrote :
2. Has anyone else noticed that most people in these forums that discuss their lack of success on eHarmony are really good at math? It's been a while but I actually remember someone posted that only 7% of his matches were real matches. And of those only 13% would make it all the way to open communication. Who pays that much attention to those details? Of course when I questioned him on this, he gave me some details and I had to correct his math...17 out of 204 matches is actually 7.76% and 2 out of 17 is 11.8%.
Yes, I always wondered how they have time to do all that math. I seldom manage to read 32.57% of my matches' profiles

pengin wrote :
3. Are there any first round questions or Must Have/Can't Stands that are immediate deal breakers? I know everyone has their own turn ons and turn offs but I'm looking more for the common ones. I think the question about willingness to relocate are pretty much turn offs. It feels like asking someone to leave their home to be closer to you on the first date.

GC and OC questions are very limited and they happen at a stage when we are all strangers to each other; therefore, I do not really consider them deal breakers, unless the guy says something very alarming. In that case, I respond with another question asking to explain why they have chosen such question or response. I also use some of those "alarm-raising" questions or responses for the phone call and/or first meet. If I am interested in the process with this particular guy, I would not close them because of one weird question or response in GC or OC.


pengin wrote :
4. Finally, what's the funniest thing you've read on someone's profile?

Not so much to share about profiles, but a weird anecdote of a first meet: one match was so nervous at first meet, that he lost his wallet during lunch at a busy restaurant and insisted in searching my purse! (as if I had pick-pocketed him, he did not say it but that was the implication.) In the end, the wallet was in his winter-coat pocket. I never returned his follow up calls; his first reaction killed any interest.
I find it funny now although when this was happening I was actually feeling deeply sorry for the guy.
 
  Reply With Quote
SearchingHoping is offline SearchingHoping Post #5  December 30,2010, 9:34am
SearchingHopi…'s Avatar

is procratisnating when the green light is on...

Pacesetter

Joined: Dec 2010

Posts: 465

See profile

mitchell175 wrote :
Again, that same guy above who said things like "Foo on eHarmony for telling me I can't choose my parents as the most influential people!"
Foo?? Then later, in OC, he asked me if I like to go to "the cinema". Not "the movies". Sorry, I had to close him.
.
Well, Brits and people with English as a second language who learnt (or learned-- in US spelling) British English in school would tend to write "cinema" instead of "the movies". What is the problem with that? I do not get it.
Last edited by SearchingHoping; December 30,2010 at 9:37am. Reason: run on
 
  Reply With Quote
Dafearon is offline Dafearon Post #6  December 30,2010, 3:29pm
Dafearon's Avatar

Veteran

Joined: Jul 2008

Maryland

Posts: 2,181

See profile

pengin wrote :
I have a few random questions about eHarmony and this forum.

1. Is there a standard timeframe for responding to someone's message on any of the guided communication or open communication steps? For instance, if someone sends me a message and I respond within two hours do I seem desperate? If I wait two days, does it seem like I don't care to communicate?
Personally, I think you should answer as soon as you can. It takes two to communicate, and if you are quick to answer one step, you may not be quick to answer the next step. But if wait and forget, then you will appear to be not interested. I think its better to answer when you can.

pengin wrote :
2. Has anyone else noticed that most people in these forums that discuss their lack of success on eHarmony are really good at math? It's been a while but I actually remember someone posted that only 7% of his matches were real matches. And of those only 13% would make it all the way to open communication. Who pays that much attention to those details? Of course when I questioned him on this, he gave me some details and I had to correct his math...17 out of 204 matches is actually 7.76% and 2 out of 17 is 11.8%.
I'm Asian, I have math in my genetics. Actually, this kind of math has always been easy for me. However, I got stumped after Calculus

pengin wrote :
3. Are there any first round questions or Must Have/Can't Stands that are immediate deal breakers? I know everyone has their own turn ons and turn offs but I'm looking more for the common ones. I think the question about willingness to relocate are pretty much turn offs. It feels like asking someone to leave their home to be closer to you on the first date.
Personally, I avoid any sexual MH/CS. You never know how someone will interpret what you're trying to say. Its safer to not include it. That is my opinion only though.

pengin wrote :
4. Finally, what's the funniest thing you've read on someone's profile?
Nothing really comes to mind.
 
  Reply With Quote
Gr8Guyn2008 is offline Gr8Guyn2008 Post #7  December 31,2010, 8:07pm
Gr8Guyn2008's Avatar

I'm crippled by the fear That I've fallen too far to love

Sage

Joined: Jan 2008

Orlando, FL

Posts: 19,670

See profile

pengin wrote :
I have a few random questions about eHarmony and this forum.

1. Is there a standard timeframe for responding to someone's message on any of the guided communication or open communication steps? For instance, if someone sends me a message and I respond within two hours do I seem desperate? If I wait two days, does it seem like I don't care to communicate?
I consider that matches that don't / can't respond to a communication within a 24 hour period are not all that serious about dating or find a relationship. I have often gone through Guided Communication in a day or two.

2. Has anyone else noticed that most people in these forums that discuss their lack of success on eHarmony are really good at math? It's been a while but I actually remember someone posted that only 7% of his matches were real matches. And of those only 13% would make it all the way to open communication. Who pays that much attention to those details? Of course when I questioned him on this, he gave me some details and I had to correct his math...17 out of 204 matches is actually 7.76% and 2 out of 17 is 11.8%.
The (regular) eHarmony Advice posters have been shown to not be representative of the general population. You are likely to find that the type of people that are attracted to posting on a regular basis may also be the type that are mathematically inclined. I do my math in my head and make estimates instead of getting my calculator and calculating the percent of matches that are dead to the nth decimal place.

3. Are there any first round questions or Must Have/Can't Stands that are immediate deal breakers? I know everyone has their own turn ons and turn offs but I'm looking more for the common ones. I think the question about willingness to relocate are pretty much turn offs. It feels like asking someone to leave their home to be closer to you on the first date.
Not for me.

4. Finally, what's the funniest thing you've read on someone's profile?
Above.
 
  Reply With Quote
thecowfarmer is offline thecowfarmer Post #8  January 2,2011, 5:00pm
thecowfarmer's Avatar

Newbie

Joined: Nov 2010

Posts: 5

See profile

pengin wrote :
I have a few random questions about eHarmony and this forum.

1. Is there a standard timeframe for responding to someone's message on any of the guided communication or open communication steps? For instance, if someone sends me a message and I respond within two hours do I seem desperate? If I wait two days, does it seem like I don't care to communicate?

It depends, there is no right answer. I try to respond as soon as I can, but I realize every has different response times. I don't judge by response time, if my match does then they are not right for me.


2. Has anyone else noticed that most people in these forums that discuss their lack of success on eHarmony are really good at math? It's been a while but I actually remember someone posted that only 7% of his matches were real matches. And of those only 13% would make it all the way to open communication. Who pays that much attention to those details? Of course when I questioned him on this, he gave me some details and I had to correct his math...17 out of 204 matches is actually 7.76% and 2 out of 17 is 11.8%.

264 Matches
Communicating(ed) 81 (includes 3 messaged by)
GC responses 9 (2 messaged by)
OC responses 6 (1 messaged by) (1 i ended, 2 stopped responding)
Met 2 (1 messaged by)

So my math
9/81 - 11.1% communication response rate (yours is 11.8%)
not sure how you determined "real" matches.
2/81 - 2.5% "meet rate"

All that really matters to me is meeting people.
In 2 months, I have met 2 people.


3. Are there any first round questions or Must Have/Can't Stands that are immediate deal breakers? I know everyone has their own turn ons and turn offs but I'm looking more for the common ones. I think the question about willingness to relocate are pretty much turn offs. It feels like asking someone to leave their home to be closer to you on the first date.

I think you answered your own question. Everyone has their own, though I will never close a match based on "must have and can't stands" without clarifying first. I have had it on both sides that explaining what was meant proved that I misunderstood what they meant.

My worst story on this. A match put in "Gambling" as a "can't stand". I messaged them in open communication and addressed it right away. I had told them that gambling was a part of my life, but I am not an obsessive gambler. I explained I play cards frequently (nickel, quarter, dime) and I host poker tourneys for charity and frequently do gentleman’s bets for pride.

The match responded with a tirade against gamblers, that was quite honestly rude. Though it showed how much she “couldn’t stand” it. The worst part about it is that she still suggested that we could be a match, if I don't gamble. This part made me feel like she didn't even read my e-mail, and I closed the match.

4. Finally, what's the funniest thing you've read on someone's profile?
Don't remember
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Topics
Topic Topic Starter Board Replies Last Post
50% closed with reason other on first communication mzzButterfly Using eHarmony 33 March 13,2011 10:13am
eHarmony Profile Workshop: Question 8: "What's The One Thing People Don't Notice About You...?" eHA_Admin_Lori Using eHarmony 57 November 9,2010 2:02pm
Are these questions odd kmkz Using eHarmony 55 July 23,2010 9:20am
eHarmony Profile Workshop Question 11: Describe the last book that you read and enjoyed... eHA_Admin_Lori Using eHarmony 26 April 22,2010 2:49pm
Random questions about you VB_Girl About You 30 January 26,2010 2:51am

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“Exit interviews are highly recommended in many dating books and in other life strategy books. They are very effective. I think he would answer honestly to the some point. I know that is horrible and ... ” –  biking_girl

Join the “Exit interview after unsuccessful date” discussion

“And I'd also add that while a successful stable job down the road and a solid income is helpful in attracting a woman, it's no guarantee that finding love will be easy for you. I know plenty of men ... ” –  boschimsp

Join the “Should I ever date in college?” discussion

“I think if someone says they can't meet you for weeks, they are lukewarm interested. Even if he were truly busy with a project, he'd be able to drop you an email or a text here and there. I took ... ” –  Carole1520

Join the “Did he poof?” discussion

“ Yes, illegal aliens aren't treated as illegals. lol OP, trust your gut. A few months ago, I met a guy on match, who said his membership was expiring, and gave me his IM so we could chat. I ... ” –  Carole1520

Join the “Match from another country...is he a "fraud"?” discussion

“I thought this thread was about exercise. Positive OP though...nice to see.” –  Breezy1

Join the “It's a matter of fit” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 7:26pm.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0