KittyLu is offline KittyLu Post #1  August 8,2009, 7:54pm
KittyLu's Avatar

Newbie

Joined: Mar 2009

Posts: 7

See profile

One of the questions I have been asked before in GC is, "Do you believe in chemistry?" I am not sure if I have the working correct. I what some of you think of this question. Personally, I don't think it helps much in determining if a match is right for you. I find the way the word chemistry is used currently to be pretty much trendy.

In the past, if I thought I had chemistry with a guy it meant to me that I had the hots for him and could feel there was an attraction back. So, yeah, I believe in chemistry. I had great chemistry with someone in my past, fantastic chemistry. But he was not the right person for me.

So what does chemistry have to do with finding the "love of your life"? Sure attraction is extremely important someone could just be looking for way too much chemistry and not enough substance.

Ever been closed because of the chemistry thing at an early stage? What do you think of that?

Just thought this would be an interesting topic for discussion.
 
  Reply With Quote
tirhod is offline tirhod Post #2  August 8,2009, 8:01pm
tirhod's Avatar

Newbie

Joined: Aug 2009

Indiana

Posts: 33

See profile

I do not personally use this question as it strikes me as ambiguous. But most of the opening questions seem relatively innocent and directed more at getting things going than diffing into the depths of your match.
 
  Reply With Quote
CreolePrincess is offline CreolePrincess Post #3  August 8,2009, 8:58pm
CreolePrinces…'s Avatar

It is so complicated, ya'll, and it doesn't even have to be.

Virtuoso

Joined: May 2009

The Dirty South

Posts: 2,575

See profile

I think your definition of chemistry is what most think it is, and at eH it seems to be the most important thing as there are dozens upon dozens of posts that say people immediately close out if there is no picture posted or if it's not a full body shot. Those are just the facts it seems.
 
  Reply With Quote
Gr8Guyn2008 is offline Gr8Guyn2008 Post #4  August 9,2009, 5:37am
Gr8Guyn2008's Avatar

I'm crippled by the fear That I've fallen too far to love

Sage

Joined: Jan 2008

Orlando, FL

Posts: 19,670

See profile

This is an interesting question and it has been asked in different ways many times before. Most people, I believe, have the same definition of "chemistry" as you do.

I do ask this question in GC. The reason that I ask it is because I am interested in whether my match is going to base my worth on lust or if she will be evaluating me on consideration of values.

If they choose "I need to feel that instant "click"" then I figure I won't be getting past a first date.

And no I have never closed because how someone answered this question.
 
  Reply With Quote
Gr8Guyn2008 is offline Gr8Guyn2008 Post #5  August 9,2009, 5:50am
Gr8Guyn2008's Avatar

I'm crippled by the fear That I've fallen too far to love

Sage

Joined: Jan 2008

Orlando, FL

Posts: 19,670

See profile

I think your definition of chemistry is what most think it is, and at eH it seems to be the most important thing as there are dozens upon dozens of posts that say people immediately close out if there is no picture posted or if it's not a full body shot. Those are just the facts it seems.
Closing because there are no photos and "chemistry" are two entirely different things. You will never be able to judge "chemistry" until you meet in person. You will also never know what someone looks like until you meet in person as a photo is a two dimensional likeness of the person and that likeness may or may not be representative of what they actually look like.

Closing someone because they have not posted a photo is really about fairness. I have my photo available for you to see and I expect the same from you. If you are not willing to post a photo then that is sending a clear signal of any number of problems.
 
  Reply With Quote
Tanker is offline Tanker Post #6  August 18,2009, 7:32pm
Tanker's Avatar

is at home.

Newbie

Joined: Nov 2007

Santa Clara

Posts: 16

See profile

My first set of questions Asked me about chemistry. Not sure how to answer and I wonder why a woman asks that question. Any advice.
 
  Reply With Quote
Tanker is offline Tanker Post #7  August 18,2009, 7:41pm
Tanker's Avatar

is at home.

Newbie

Joined: Nov 2007

Santa Clara

Posts: 16

See profile

So if a woman asks that does she think your going to take off if you don't feel that click
 
  Reply With Quote
SleeplessinTrenton is offline SleeplessinTrenton Post #8  August 19,2009, 10:59pm
SleeplessinTr…'s Avatar

Pacesetter

Joined: Nov 2008

Posts: 284

See profile

I think your definition of chemistry is what most think it is, and at eH it seems to be the most important thing as there are dozens upon dozens of posts that say people immediately close out if there is no picture posted or if it's not a full body shot. Those are just the facts it seems.

It's my impression, after reading hundreds and hundreds of posts here, that it is the only important factor for many eharmony members. I would appreciate it if someone from eharmony could explain why that is, particularly since this site's advertising so pointedly stresses a matching protocol based upon more than two dozen compatibility factors. If I've been matched with some woman based on an analysis of 29 dimensions of compatibility, why is she so obsessive about "chemistry", when that is not something that matters to me?
 
  Reply With Quote
Oregon_Coast_Guy is offline Oregon_Coast_Guy Post #9  August 20,2009, 12:05am
Oregon_Coast_…'s Avatar

We're one of a kind, like dip di-dip di-dip, doo-bop a doo-bee doo

Veteran

Joined: Sep 2008

OR

Posts: 2,405

See profile

It's my impression, after reading hundreds and hundreds of posts here, that it is the only important factor for many eharmony members. I would appreciate it if someone from eharmony could explain why that is, particularly since this site's advertising so pointedly stresses a matching protocol based upon more than two dozen compatibility factors. If I've been matched with some woman based on an analysis of 29 dimensions of compatibility, why is she so obsessive about "chemistry", when that is not something that matters to me?
So what's wrong with physical attraction being the most important factor in the relationship? Isn't that how ALL relationships start out? Don't all relationships start with, "Wow, that gal/guy is really cute. I'm going to ask her out/I'll go out with him if he asks me." Every couple goes on a first date.

Now, to your credit, once on the date, you can see the person's personality and determine if you want a second date or not.

To try to answer your question: As eHarmony is a "dating" site, the object of joining eHarmony is to get "dates." All eHarmony does is advertizes itself differently. eH is hoping to appeal to and take advantage of people like you (don't take offense to that): someone who is lonely and looking for "love" by downplaying the physical aspect in the verbage by mentioning the 29 dimensions. Essentially, you are being told that eHarmony does not rule in the lust factor. Or are you? Just look at the people they feature in the commercials.

However, eHarmony's advertizing campaign has made it the most famous of all dating sites. Just about anyone on the street would recognize Dr. Warren's face if they were shown a picture. There have also been countless parodies of eH commericals in late night comedy. Because eH is so well known, that fame is going to bring more and more people who have wider and different dating objectives. The odd thing is: these objecctives often conflict with the customer whom they are advertizing to.

Plus you need to take this into account: Because eH is significantly more expensive than other dating sites, more people will be drawn to eH in order to find a "better quality" date (i.e., wealthier). But what's wrong with that?

Ok, to go back to my original point, looks get you a first date, personality gets you a second date. That's human nature. And the last time I checked, everyone on eHarmony was human.
 
  Reply With Quote
SleeplessinTrenton is offline SleeplessinTrenton Post #10  August 20,2009, 7:39am
SleeplessinTr…'s Avatar

Pacesetter

Joined: Nov 2008

Posts: 284

See profile

Oregon, I appreciate your perspective and insight. Most of your points may be true. It's likely that many members did not join to be matched on the basis of the 29 dimensions but joined to be able to look at photos of matches and to use the photos as the exclusive screening vehicle. That's fine for them, and I hope that each one of them meets someone with a suitable appearance and lives happily ever after.

I'm raising a different point. If I've been matched with women based on the 29 dimensions, and I'm not at all interested in "chemistry" or appearance-based characteristics, why are my matches so focused on that sort of thing? I'm curious why the eharmony matching protocols sent me matches whose focus on the computer-based introduction process is so very different from mine? With the detailed questionnaires used by eharmony, I expect that something so obvious as appearance-obsession and its absence would be detected and used in the screening protocols. It would be nice to meet someone with similar values, some shared interests, whose character I could admire, who is emotionally stable, and who has a serene demeanor. Dress size and hair color are unimportant to me, for example. I would appreciate someone from eharmony explaining what I might do to get matched with the sort of person who I'd like to meet and not get matched with these "chemistry"-focused women.
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply
  • Page 1 of 3
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Topics
Topic Topic Starter Board Replies Last Post
eHarmony Profile Workshop: Question 8: "What's The One Thing People Don't Notice About You...?" eHA_Admin_Lori Using eHarmony 57 November 9,2010 2:02pm
Lots of similarities but no chemistry..? greentea_girl Dating 35 August 2,2010 10:33pm
Folly of minimizing attraction and chemistry waltercl Dating 224 September 23,2009 4:21pm
How do you "show" chemistry? MoneyHoney Dating 14 July 27,2009 10:37am
Chemistry, Compatibility... and Divorce last12C Relationships 221 July 19,2009 2:22pm

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“Absolutely not. I have no idea why allowing gays to marry would affect anyone's lives, unless they're sexually insecure about themselves.” –  sun73

Join the “Did our President give up the election for a single issue?” discussion

“I learned that the woman's communication style has to fit mine or else it won't work.” –  sun73

Join the “Why do 40 yr olds still play games?” discussion

“Here's where to email if you think a match might be a fraud: matchconcerns@eharmony.com . Tell them the match's name and location so they can find them. If what's making you suspicious is an email ... ” –  Simplicity-2012

Join the “Match from another country...is he a "fraud"?” discussion

“I know you clarified you just want a general opinion on when people bring this subject up, but I'm going to give you both that and also what I believe you should do. The general idea most of the ... ” –  Herkemer

Join the “When is it time to discuss your position on having kids?” discussion

“And that's a very valid point. I get the feeling that eHarmony is keeping their price high to show they they are not cheap and therefore, their members are serious.It seems to me that combining the ... ” –  MicMan

Join the “Free Communication Weekend” discussion

“How long have you all been on EH? Thanks for the advice. I signed on in late April 2012 but have been on other dating sites in the past.” –  Simplicity-2012

Join the “New Here” discussion

“The only one that bothers me is the "they weren't his kids so meh ..." But there could be a whole world of story behind that. Like "she dumped me and it was painful and I hated losing the kids in ... ” –  Simplicity-2012

Join the “Yellow flags...To Proceed or not to proceed, that is the question?” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 1:56pm.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0