A 10% Response Rate is Fairly Typical


Reply
  • Page 1 of 3
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
 
Topic Tools Search this Thread
Mike74 is offline Mike74 Post #1  February 6,2012, 4:17pm
Mike74's Avatar

Enthusiast

Joined: Dec 2010

NJ

Posts: 867

See profile

There are quite a few active threads on the boards from newcomers, wondering whether their online experiences are normal, or whether their results are subpar. Rather than posting numerous times, I figured I would start a new thread to detail my experiences.

I was active on several online dating sites, including eHarmony and Match, for about a year -- from late 2010 to late 2011 (when I met my GF). Over that time period, I received responses from approximately 10% of the women that I initiated communication with -- either by sending an email (for sites other than eH) or by starting GC (for eH). Based on my participation in other threads on this topic, I think that those results are pretty typical for guys using online dating sites.

Now, there are a couple of techniques that I developed as the year went on that improved my results slightly: (i) on sites other than eH, sending a streamlined (2 sentence) initial email commenting on a fact or 2 from the woman's profile, and (ii) not bothering to contact anyone who was not active on the site within the last few days. My profiles varied from well written (eH) to thrown together (POF), and my photos were pretty bad, because I just used whatever I had available. I might have improved my response rate slightly if I improved my photos. Be that as it may, 10% is what I, an average guy from Jersey, was able to achieve.

Has anyone gotten a significantly higher response rate? If so, what techniques did you use?
 
  Reply With Quote
ChameleonX is offline ChameleonX Post #2  February 6,2012, 4:34pm
ChameleonX's Avatar

Pretty good I guess

Newbie

Joined: Feb 2012

Kansas City

Posts: 11

See profile

This technique only worked for me on match; modified, it can work on eh, but my results were significantly different. I got a little bogged down at work once and decided that due to a lack of time, I would only email woman that looked at my profile; I didn't have time to go trolling myself. Following that logic, in a 30 day span I emailed 8 women, 4 responded, and I went on 3 dates that month. Of course the following month wasn't nearly as exciting. I think I got 1 date that month, and none on the third.

On eh I tried that once when I got busy again, except because of the way it's set up, I waited until they went back to my profile twice. This was the indicater to me (however mislead it may have been) that they may want me to reach out to them with GC. In a 4 month time span I sent out a TOTAL of 3, got one reply, and dated her for a while before circumstances split us apart. The number may have seem higher, but 1 reply in 4 months hardly seems like a sound technique. I wouldn't recommend it.
 
  Reply With Quote
Gr8Guyn2008 is offline Gr8Guyn2008 Post #3  February 6,2012, 4:42pm
Gr8Guyn2008's Avatar

I'm crippled by the fear That I've fallen too far to love

Sage

Joined: Jan 2008

Orlando, FL

Posts: 19,670

See profile

Mike74 wrote :
There are quite a few active threads on the boards from newcomers, wondering whether their online experiences are normal, or whether their results are subpar. Rather than posting numerous times, I figured I would start a new thread to detail my experiences.

I was active on several online dating sites, including eHarmony and Match, for about a year -- from late 2010 to late 2011 (when I met my GF). Over that time period, I received responses from approximately 10% of the women that I initiated communication with -- either by sending an email (for sites other than eH) or by starting GC (for eH). Based on my participation in other threads on this topic, I think that those results are pretty typical for guys using online dating sites.

Now, there are a couple of techniques that I developed as the year went on that improved my results slightly: (i) on sites other than eH, sending a streamlined (2 sentence) initial email commenting on a fact or 2 from the woman's profile, and (ii) not bothering to contact anyone who was not active on the site within the last few days. My profiles varied from well written (eH) to thrown together (POF), and my photos were pretty bad, because I just used whatever I had available. I might have improved my response rate slightly if I improved my photos. Be that as it may, 10% is what I, an average guy from Jersey, was able to achieve.

Has anyone gotten a significantly higher response rate? If so, what techniques did you use?
There are a couple of guys on these boards that (claim) significantly higher rates of return. TangoChef comes to mind as the one who claims something of an inverse to your experience. If memory serves Tweet is the one who says that he mostly never initiated because he had more women initiating with him than he could handle.

However, your experience is far more normal to the average eHarmony user and certainly mirrored my own experience prior to 2011 and 2012. Since rejoining 3 months ago I am experiencing more like a 1% response and get almost no matches, it has been a couple of weeks since I got a new match.

If you were getting a 10% response rate on Match or any other site I would say you were doing really well based on my experience. I had less than 1% response on Match and even less on OK Cupid. I would not touch anything on POF in my area, even with your 10 foot pole.

I have always had a well written profile on all sites along with good photos given the subject with which to work. On Match I always sent a well written e-mail that addressed commonalities between my match and myself, which I kept reasonably short but more than just a sentence or two.
 
  Reply With Quote
shapeShifter79 is offline shapeShifter79 Post #4  February 6,2012, 4:45pm
shapeShifter7…'s Avatar

likes dancing!

Board Leader: Health & Wellness

Joined: Apr 2011

CA

Posts: 2,499

See profile

Mike74 wrote :
Has anyone gotten a significantly higher response rate? If so, what techniques did you use?
Yes, I had a much, much higher response rate. I improved my physical shape at the gym and posted clear photos and a detailed "no-hedging" profile telling matches exactly who I am. I gave detailed answers to their questions and wasn't afraid to ask or state what mattered to me.

I've been dating my girlfriend since November! eH works for me. )
Last edited by shapeShifter79; February 6,2012 at 4:49pm.
 
  Reply With Quote
Gr8Guyn2008 is offline Gr8Guyn2008 Post #5  February 6,2012, 4:47pm
Gr8Guyn2008's Avatar

I'm crippled by the fear That I've fallen too far to love

Sage

Joined: Jan 2008

Orlando, FL

Posts: 19,670

See profile

ChameleonX wrote :
This technique only worked for me on match; modified, it can work on eh, but my results were significantly different. I got a little bogged down at work once and decided that due to a lack of time, I would only email woman that looked at my profile; I didn't have time to go trolling myself. Following that logic, in a 30 day span I emailed 8 women, 4 responded, and I went on 3 dates that month. Of course the following month wasn't nearly as exciting. I think I got 1 date that month, and none on the third.

On eh I tried that once when I got busy again, except because of the way it's set up, I waited until they went back to my profile twice. This was the indicator to me (however mislead it may have been) that they may want me to reach out to them with GC. In a 4 month time span I sent out a TOTAL of 3, got one reply, and dated her for a while before circumstances split us apart. The number may have seem higher, but 1 reply in 4 months hardly seems like a sound technique. I wouldn't recommend it.
Given your lack of initiation I would say that contacting 3 matches, getting one response and then dating that person for "awhile" would be pretty darn good. This means that you had a 33% success rate.
 
  Reply With Quote
harnomygirl is offline harnomygirl Post #6  February 6,2012, 4:47pm
harnomygirl's Avatar

Power Poster

Joined: Mar 2011

Posts: 6,418

See profile

Yes, I had a much, much higher response rate. I improved my physical shape at the gym and posted clear photos and a detailed "no-hedging" profile telling matches exactly who I really am.
And you like dancing. Who could resist that?
 
  Reply With Quote
DaLocman is offline DaLocman Post #7  February 6,2012, 5:06pm
DaLocman's Avatar

Quick Study

Joined: Sep 2010

Posts: 242

See profile

My own experience is somewhat similar to Gr8guy. I know I've emailed hundreds of women at least among a group of sites, primarily match and OKC, though a bit on Jazzed a while back.

As far as responses from those just by a return email.. I'm certain it's less than 10%. Meeting in person, 2 out of hundreds is probably in those single digits too.

OKC has been my best site by far... match was silent for a year short of one match to meet in person plus two very short email conversations. I wrote at least the req. to get the match deal plus quite a few more... so those plus quite a bunch on OKC now too must equal 150-200 by now. It feels like much more so...

Eharmony, I'm not ss, but in 2 years.. 2 matches have sent requests for GC. Since I'm not initiating there, it's explained but my profile isn't catching any eyes either way.

POF, very quiet in the responses there too, but i've written far fewer mails.

OP, I'd agree with Gr8guy, you're hardly having to try and getting high success rates against a norm. You'd be overwhelmed it sounds like if you write a lot more.
 
  Reply With Quote
ChameleonX is offline ChameleonX Post #8  February 6,2012, 5:13pm
ChameleonX's Avatar

Pretty good I guess

Newbie

Joined: Feb 2012

Kansas City

Posts: 11

See profile

Gr8Guyn2008 wrote :
Given your lack of initiation I would say that contacting 3 matches, getting one response and then dating that person for "awhile" would be pretty darn good. This means that you had a 33% success rate.
If you look at it that way, then yes it sounds like a good number. But getting one response in 4 months is brutal. It worked out nicely for me, but I don't know that I have that kind of patience anymore. LOL
 
  Reply With Quote
Mr_Right is offline Mr_Right Post #9  February 6,2012, 5:15pm
Mr_Right's Avatar

says this is the best wedding picture!

Virtuoso

Joined: Jun 2008

USA

Posts: 4,402

See profile

Mike74 wrote :
There are quite a few active threads on the boards from newcomers, wondering whether their online experiences are normal, or whether their results are subpar. Rather than posting numerous times, I figured I would start a new thread to detail my experiences.

I was active on several online dating sites, including eHarmony and Match, for about a year -- from late 2010 to late 2011 (when I met my GF). Over that time period, I received responses from approximately 10% of the women that I initiated communication with -- either by sending an email (for sites other than eH) or by starting GC (for eH). Based on my participation in other threads on this topic, I think that those results are pretty typical for guys using online dating sites.

Now, there are a couple of techniques that I developed as the year went on that improved my results slightly: (i) on sites other than eH, sending a streamlined (2 sentence) initial email commenting on a fact or 2 from the woman's profile, and (ii) not bothering to contact anyone who was not active on the site within the last few days. My profiles varied from well written (eH) to thrown together (POF), and my photos were pretty bad, because I just used whatever I had available. I might have improved my response rate slightly if I improved my photos. Be that as it may, 10% is what I, an average guy from Jersey, was able to achieve.

Has anyone gotten a significantly higher response rate? If so, what techniques did you use?
Hmmm, I'd have to say my response rate was about 35-40% or so. About 7 matches a day, and a response from 3 of them. Other than having a great profile, great photos, and sending a 2 paragraph email to start things out, I didn't do that much.
 
  Reply With Quote
ChameleonX is offline ChameleonX Post #10  February 6,2012, 5:16pm
ChameleonX's Avatar

Pretty good I guess

Newbie

Joined: Feb 2012

Kansas City

Posts: 11

See profile

DaLocman wrote :
My own experience is somewhat similar to Gr8guy. I know I've emailed hundreds of women at least among a group of sites, primarily match and OKC, though a bit on Jazzed a while back.

As far as responses from those just by a return email.. I'm certain it's less than 10%. Meeting in person, 2 out of hundreds is probably in those single digits too.

OKC has been my best site by far... match was silent for a year short of one match to meet in person plus two very short email conversations. I wrote at least the req. to get the match deal plus quite a few more... so those plus quite a bunch on OKC now too must equal 150-200 by now. It feels like much more so...

Eharmony, I'm not ss, but in 2 years.. 2 matches have sent requests for GC. Since I'm not initiating there, it's explained but my profile isn't catching any eyes either way.

POF, very quiet in the responses there too, but i've written far fewer mails.

OP, I'd agree with Gr8guy, you're hardly having to try and getting high success rates against a norm. You'd be overwhelmed it sounds like if you write a lot more.
Believe me that my experience sounds better than it actually was. It basically equals one email sent every 5 weeks. The one that I dated for a while may have been a fluke. I don't know that I would want to test that theory again.
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply
  • Page 1 of 3
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“ ^This is the better plan.. My experience has been that love usually comes along when you least expect it, and when your heart is open enough to let it in. If you try to put a set time table on when ... ” –  TheThinker

Join the “Transition from dating to relationship” discussion

“ As Ingy mentions ...he's good with the lines and multitasking relationships.. All anyone can say is: don't get played again...especially by the same guy twice... Move on to someone who is decisive ... ” –  lynntlb78

Join the “Reuniting with EX” discussion

“This varies based on your age, gender, location, settings, and 29 dimensions. My settings are fairly narrow and I've always gotten a steady stream of matches. But, my location seems to have a lot ... ” –  dmi

Join the “Different Strategy” discussion

“I'm extremely allergic to cats, plus I just don't like 'em. So I won't date someone with cats. Dogs, I love. But I'm attracted to certain types of dogs. A guy with a little yorkie turns me off. ... ” –  ZisaGirl

Join the “What about a "PET BOX" ?? again this sounds simple or??” discussion

“If you get the opportunity, yes.” –  ThePriestess

Join the “Should I ever date in college?” discussion

“...and since you're Shaun Cassidy fan mitchell...this song is just for you! "Da Doo Ron Ron" I met her on a Monday And my heart stood still Da doo ron ron ron Da doo ron ron Somebody told me That ... ” –  legend29

Join the “Robin Gibbs Dead at 62...How Deep is Your Love?” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 7:07am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0