AndieIsMe is offline AndieIsMeAdvice Member-Moderator Post #1  January 31,2012, 1:13pm
AndieIsMe's Avatar

A letter in the mail is more precious than a 1000 IMs

Volunteer Community Leader

Joined: Nov 2009

Emerald Triangle

Posts: 8,148

See profile

This is inspired by the comments made about attractiveness and dating in another thread.

wrote :
It's 20% of men that are getting ~80% of those dates. One dating site found that women considered 80% of men to be below average in attractiveness.
I disagree, completely. I don't think one requires to be seen as above average in attractiveness to be receiving offers for dates or having the offers you put out there to be accepted.

Besides the average people I see in relationships all the time, attractiveness is subject. HIGHLY subjective. One man I think is hott will not be considered attractive by one of my friends. I may be seen as beautiful by one man, but his friend doesn't agree.

Thoughts?
 
  Reply With Quote
Special-K is offline Special-K Post #2  January 31,2012, 1:32pm
Special-K's Avatar

is happier than if it was a 'no boss Friday' going into a three-day weekend... :-)

Veteran

Joined: Aug 2010

Posts: 1,880

See profile

AndieIsMe wrote :
This is inspired by the comments made about attractiveness and dating in another thread.



I disagree, completely. I don't think one requires to be seen as above average in attractiveness to be receiving offers for dates or having the offers you put out there to be accepted.

Besides the average people I see in relationships all the time, attractiveness is subject. HIGHLY subjective. One man I think is hott will not be considered attractive by one of my friends. I may be seen as beautiful by one man, but his friend doesn't agree.

Thoughts?
While I agree that attractiveness is highly subjective, I also believe that those (male and female) considered conventionally attractive have better luck online than those who might be considered average or below average in attractiveness, again, conventionally speaking.

That said, IRL, a person's attractiveness is not only highly subjective, it's multi-dimensional. Physical attractiveness aside, there are soooooo many other things that come into play when deciding a person's date-ability.
 
  Reply With Quote
beccaf87 is offline beccaf87 Post #3  January 31,2012, 1:52pm
beccaf87's Avatar

Board Leader - Travel

Joined: Sep 2010

Posts: 1,134

See profile

A personality can also highly make or break attractiveness.
 
  Reply With Quote
nick222 is offline nick222 Post #4  January 31,2012, 1:58pm
nick222's Avatar

Veteran

Joined: Feb 2011

Posts: 1,930

See profile

Special-K wrote :
Physical attractiveness aside, there are soooooo many other things that come into play when deciding a person's date-ability.
Exactly. One such factor is whether or not their view of the world is so warped that they could possibly think that 20% of men date 80% of women. _

51% of U.S. adults are in opposite-sex marriages. How do all of those men get married if most of them can't get dates? And what do the 20% do with their other 3 girlfriends that they're each hoarding once they get married? Lock them up in a shed out back? Keep them all as mistresses? Seems like a lot of work.

This isn't a "theory". This is sour grapes. Normal-looking guys get dates all the time. Generally not when they're preoccupied with blaming others for their lack of dates, though.
Last edited by nick222; January 31,2012 at 2:24pm.
 
  Reply With Quote
dmi is online now dmi Post #5  January 31,2012, 2:00pm
dmi's Avatar

dreams of Pyramids and Empires

Power Poster

Joined: May 2010

East Coast

Posts: 5,792

See profile

That OKC article also showed that women regularly messaged men that they rated as "below average". So, while maybe OKC women's rating habits may be skewed, who they actually message isn't so much.
 
  Reply With Quote
AndieIsMe is offline AndieIsMeAdvice Member-Moderator Post #6  January 31,2012, 2:04pm
AndieIsMe's Avatar

A letter in the mail is more precious than a 1000 IMs

Volunteer Community Leader

Joined: Nov 2009

Emerald Triangle

Posts: 8,148

See profile

dmi wrote :
That OKC article also showed that women regularly messaged men that they rated as "below average". So, while maybe OKC women's rating habits may be skewed, who they actually message isn't so much.

That's the thing! I may not consider every guy I've ever dated a super hotty, but "to me" he is. Does that make sense? Just because he's not going to show up on the top 100 Hottest Men in America does not mean he isn't attractive to me.
 
  Reply With Quote
dmi is online now dmi Post #7  January 31,2012, 2:08pm
dmi's Avatar

dreams of Pyramids and Empires

Power Poster

Joined: May 2010

East Coast

Posts: 5,792

See profile

AndieIsMe wrote :
That's the thing! I may not consider every guy I've ever dated a super hotty, but "to me" he is. Does that make sense? Just because he's not going to show up on the top 100 Hottest Men in America does not mean he isn't attractive to me.
But, what would you rate him on a site? A 10 because he's a 10 to you or a 5 because you think in terms of what the rest of the world would think of him?
 
  Reply With Quote
AndieIsMe is offline AndieIsMeAdvice Member-Moderator Post #8  January 31,2012, 2:16pm
AndieIsMe's Avatar

A letter in the mail is more precious than a 1000 IMs

Volunteer Community Leader

Joined: Nov 2009

Emerald Triangle

Posts: 8,148

See profile

The heck with the world. All the men I've dated have been 10's. Until they do something to become a 2.

I've dated 10's. The ones the world considers a 10. When you get past the handsome face all you are left with are personalities. If their personality can't hit a solid 7 or better, they're "overall" score drops.
 
  Reply With Quote
PG-13 is offline PG-13 Post #9  January 31,2012, 3:13pm
PG-13's Avatar

Quick Study

Joined: Jan 2012

Posts: 199

See profile

Andie, I gotta agree with you on that one... The women I've seriously dated I've considered "10s" although now I'm past those relationships, they aren't girlfriends and have more perspective, they weren't "10s"...

After the hollywood knockout types though, it is really super subjective... I think most everyone can come to consensus on 9s and 10s and 1s and 2s, but I think 4s through 7s can be really interchangeable depending on the person.

To wit from personal experience, one of my better friends seems to only date people that have the slim, athletic body type and thus, didn't find my ex particularly attractive (who was extremely busty but heavier) whereas I've thought some of his girlfriends could stand to eat some more snacks (a couple of them had that hummingbird metabolism thing, so not their fault). Its the old "to each their own". Honestly, its a really good thing that everyone finds different types/traits attractive - its a combination of social, societal, psychological, and personal influences...

As far 20-80, I think there's a tiny bit of validity that the supremely physically attractive people can have the interest level where they can "date" a lot of people but I've also found that those people can be high maintenance/have high standards (both male and female) and tend to cycle through people more quickly.

As far as long lasting, long term relationships, I'm not sure if there's that much of an advantage.
 
  Reply With Quote
AndieIsMe is offline AndieIsMeAdvice Member-Moderator Post #10  January 31,2012, 3:27pm
AndieIsMe's Avatar

A letter in the mail is more precious than a 1000 IMs

Volunteer Community Leader

Joined: Nov 2009

Emerald Triangle

Posts: 8,148

See profile

Interest levels have to be on both sides for the dates to happen, however. So, if a woman who is considered a "2" by the guy who is a "9" contacts him, it does not mean they will get a date. She most likely will be ignored or poofed on.

Getting to the date has a lot more to do with how you handle your online dating life, meeting people in general and how much confidence (not arrogance) a person exudes.
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Topics
Topic Topic Starter Board Replies Last Post
80/20 rule explains y women dont have a problem getting dates? imperfekt Dating 40 December 26,2011 9:52am
Free Communication Weekend and the Theory of Match Counts ScottK Using eHarmony 19 November 11,2010 11:10am
Ladder Theory: No friends ladder for women? What about the relationship ladder for both sexes? windsurfing Ask a Dating Expert 63 August 22,2010 10:55pm
The DOGAT Theory... How would that work exactly? jussmile Dating 30 January 29,2010 7:48am
WELCOME NEW MEMBERS!!! Introduce yourself by saying hi! DennisWisconsin Atheists, Humorists, and Science 53 September 20,2009 4:00pm

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“I did answer and then also updated with news that I was premature - there is no relationship after all.” –  picklesNcream

Join the “Blast off...!” discussion

“For dating. I'm basically in a (lifelong) rut that I would like to get out of. Sadly, my good friends are also in the same place as I am - if not worse. The topic of women is non existent among ... ” –  JohnNorthSydney

Join the “So I've been thinking about getting a coach.” discussion

“I need some advice. I'm 18, never kissed/dated a girl nor obviously had a girlfriend. I just finished my first year at a top 30 university (full ride scholarship) with a 4.0 GPA. Starting my ... ” –  jrw93

Join the “Should I ever date in college?” discussion

“The point is no me seeing their photos, I can see their photos; it is them seeing my photos. This means nothing can be gauged by any interest they show to you. On FCW I've noticed the non-paying ... ” –  JohnNorthSydney

Join the “Free Communication Weekend” discussion

“TD, Have you PM'd eH_Advice_Host_Eve to ask her for help? She is good at helping people tweak their settings so they are more likely to get the results they want. Please consider contacting her if ... ” –  tink333

Join the “Different Strategy” discussion

“Did you know OT stands for on topic and off topic?” –  Bluskies4ever3

Join the “Off -Topic” discussion

“My inner child says I am. Anastasia is intriguing. (Her name too). I like the dress she's wearing in the ad. I wonder how eHarmony picks the couples for their print and TV ads.” –  Bluskies4ever3

Join the “Where is Becky?!?” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 6:46am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0