Clingy v. Good Communicator


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Thread
VB_Girl is offline VB_Girl Post #1  June 23,2010, 6:40pm
VB_Girl's Avatar

is working hard for this vacation!

Power Poster

Joined: Feb 2009

Chicago

Posts: 6,946

See profile

What is the distinction you make between a person being needy and someone you consider to have good communication skills?

When I'm getting to know a person, I like to talk to them often and am happy to talk, text or email with them fairly frequently.
 
  Reply With Quote
MelinCali is offline MelinCali Post #2  June 23,2010, 7:07pm
MelinCali's Avatar

is moving!

Power Poster

Joined: Nov 2008

Earth

Posts: 8,113

See profile

I also like to talk and be in touch frequently too.

I think a clingy person might text, email and initiate calls, in some kind of combination, without any kind of reciprocation from the other person. Multiple texts and emails back and forth each day are fine, but without responses, it looks like the person is trying desperately to get the other person's attention. It's also very clingy to expect phone calls after spending the day in communication. Not everyone likes to spend loads of time every night talking on the phone (go figure!).

I think someone who communicates well and very frequently, but doesn't come across as clingy, is receptive to cues on how much the other person likes to communicate. He or she might ask when they should call. They patiently wait for responses to text/email without timing the person and analyzing intervals of contact for motivation.

Considering things I've read here, the good communicator doesn't say they will speak to someone on Tuesday night because one partner is busy until that evening, then barrage the person with texts, wondering why the person is taking 5 hours to respond to a message..... that would be pretty needy, by my estimation.

I don't think you're looking for things like they say what they mean, not expect you to read between the lines or use your psychic powers to know what they're really thinking, right?
 
  Reply With Quote
jayjay is offline jayjay Post #3  June 23,2010, 7:12pm
jayjay's Avatar

...things seem to have gotten quiet around here.

Sage

Joined: Jun 2008

Brownsville, TX

Posts: 10,932

See profile

I think an element of emotional desperation is part of the 'needy' approach to communication.
 
  Reply With Quote
VB_Girl is offline VB_Girl Post #4  June 23,2010, 7:15pm
VB_Girl's Avatar

is working hard for this vacation!

Power Poster

Joined: Feb 2009

Chicago

Posts: 6,946

See profile

MelinCali wrote :
I also like to talk and be in touch frequently too.

I think a clingy person might text, email and initiate calls, in some kind of combination, without any kind of reciprocation from the other person. Multiple texts and emails back and forth each day are fine, but without responses, it looks like the person is trying desperately to get the other person's attention. It's also very clingy to expect phone calls after spending the day in communication. Not everyone likes to spend loads of time every night talking on the phone (go figure!).

I think someone who communicates well and very frequently, but doesn't come across as clingy, is receptive to cues on how much the other person likes to communicate. He or she might ask when they should call. They patiently wait for responses to text/email without timing the person and analyzing intervals of contact for motivation.

Considering things I've read here, the good communicator doesn't say they will speak to someone on Tuesday night because one partner is busy until that evening, then barrage the person with texts, wondering why the person is taking 5 hours to respond to a message..... that would be pretty needy, by my estimation.

I don't think you're looking for things like they say what they mean, not expect you to read between the lines or use your psychic powers to know what they're really thinking, right?
I have psychic powers?

Good points! I do wonder what they are up to when I haven't heard from them in a while, but hopefully they are doing the same.
Last edited by VB_Girl; June 23,2010 at 7:15pm. Reason: ... and no, I don't wait around to hear from them, I initiate too.
 
  Reply With Quote
kimbirdy is offline kimbirdy Post #5  June 23,2010, 7:16pm
kimbirdy's Avatar

is bouncing back

Newbie

Joined: Mar 2010

Phoenix

Posts: 48

See profile

I think it boils down to the motivation behind the communication -- if it's because it's reciprocated and there is a good rapport, then good. If it's because you feel anxious if you're out of contact with the other person, then bad.
 
  Reply With Quote
VB_Girl is offline VB_Girl Post #6  June 23,2010, 7:20pm
VB_Girl's Avatar

is working hard for this vacation!

Power Poster

Joined: Feb 2009

Chicago

Posts: 6,946

See profile

kimbirdy wrote :
I think it boils down to the motivation behind the communication -- if it's because it's reciprocated and there is a good rapport, then good. If it's because you feel anxious if you're out of contact with the other person, then bad.
Very true! I think most of us have been in both places and would much prefer the first.
 
  Reply With Quote
melman is offline melman Post #7  June 23,2010, 7:26pm
melman's Avatar

Virtuoso

Joined: Aug 2009

Posts: 2,944

See profile

VB_Girl wrote :
When I'm getting to know a person, I like to talk to them often and am happy to talk, text or email with them fairly frequently.
The frequency of communication says a lot about the share of mind (for lack of a better term) that you are giving the other person.

I expect my matches to have a busy life that does not depend on me. Prior to being exclusive, I don't expect frequent communication, wouldn't want it, and wouldn't reply to it. If it persisted anyway, a "talk" would have to take place.
 
  Reply With Quote
Oregon_Coast_Guy is offline Oregon_Coast_Guy Post #8  June 23,2010, 7:40pm
Oregon_Coast_…'s Avatar

We're one of a kind, like dip di-dip di-dip, doo-bop a doo-bee doo

Veteran

Joined: Sep 2008

OR

Posts: 2,405

See profile

Good communicator = you like the person.

Clingy = you don't like the person.

However, it should be noted that frequency of communication can turn you from being liked to not liked, and vice versa.
 
  Reply With Quote
MelinCali is offline MelinCali Post #9  June 23,2010, 7:43pm
MelinCali's Avatar

is moving!

Power Poster

Joined: Nov 2008

Earth

Posts: 8,113

See profile

Good communicator = you like the person.

Clingy = you don't like the person.

However, it should be noted that frequency of communication can turn you from being liked to not liked, and vice versa.
So you just can't win, right? LOL!
 
  Reply With Quote
VB_Girl is offline VB_Girl Post #10  June 23,2010, 7:54pm
VB_Girl's Avatar

is working hard for this vacation!

Power Poster

Joined: Feb 2009

Chicago

Posts: 6,946

See profile

melman wrote :
The frequency of communication says a lot about the share of mind (for lack of a better term) that you are giving the other person.

I expect my matches to have a busy life that does not depend on me. Prior to being exclusive, I don't expect frequent communication, wouldn't want it, and wouldn't reply to it. If it persisted anyway, a "talk" would have to take place.
The amount of time spent thinking about them and the time spent actually communicating is usually quite different (at least for me). I try to keep in mind that the other person has a life they are living. I also hope their life isn't so busy that there isn't room to date.

How do you get to exclusive if you don't communicate frequently?
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Topics
Topic Topic Starter Board Replies Last Post
How long without sex? Looking back was it a good thing? curlygirlpdx About You 141 June 13,2011 12:56am
Too Good To Be True? beatlejuice72 Dating 14 September 22,2010 9:30pm
Good at relationships; Bad at dating PreachersSon BaptistViewPoints 9 July 16,2010 10:52pm
What is good enough? WeDesignOurLives Intelligent Conversation 30 April 6,2010 5:43pm
A Relationships with Good Therapist and Bad Therapist justme27 Relationships 35 January 24,2010 11:11am

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“Sometimes it is better than going on a so-so date just to fill your calendar.” –  sun73

Join the “dreaded free weekend” discussion

“When a man dates women, especially exclusively, who are much more physically attractive, I think he gets exactly what he's asking for and what he deserves - a woman who is not physically attracted to ... ” –  Bluskies4ever3

Join the “My first "Matchmaker" date” discussion

“ I was never into David Cassidy. Now, Shaun Cassidy... loved him! (And he was such a girl, too. So pretty!) I still have his album, too. I think it has my sister's name sticker on it, too. ” –  mitchell175

Join the “Robin Gibbs Dead at 62...How Deep is Your Love?” discussion

“Hmm. I think we are using the term 'preference' differently. Anyway, you can choose 'not important' for everything if you want the widest range of choices possible. If you do that and still don't get ... ” –  mitchell175

Join the “Different Strategy” discussion

“Seriously? That cloud looks nothing like George Clooney!” –  mitchell175

Join the “Comment to win a FREE month of eHarmony!” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:33am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0