Who Pays? Men, I have something to say to you.


Reply
 
Topic Tools Search this Thread
notyet is offline notyet Post #1181  January 28,2012, 12:20pm
notyet's Avatar

Power Poster

Joined: Nov 2008

Posts: 5,276

See profile

harnomygirl wrote :
I am beginning to wonder how bad it is out there for young, attractive, single, professional women. I wish we'd get input from additional posters who date that category.
from another old if timely thread (A Question For The Guys (Age Difference)), it is nigh on impossible for women in your demographic

i remember and have posted before about a Maureen Dowd column (can't now find a link) where she laments the fact that the more successful a woman gets the less desirable she appears to be to the opposite sex.

and of course, it has been documented before that the more attractive a woman is, the more intimidating she is perceived to be.

unfortunately attractive, articulate, professionally women seem to have a real rough row to hoe.
 
  Reply With Quote
Special-K is offline Special-K Post #1182  January 28,2012, 12:21pm
Special-K's Avatar

is happier than if it was a 'no boss Friday' going into a three-day weekend... :-)

Veteran

Joined: Aug 2010

Posts: 1,880

See profile

No, what you describe I would consider a hook-up.

I have dated men as young as 30 and they still follow traditional social norms where 'dating' is concerned. There is no exchange of one for the other... it's a process.

If one is using 'dating' exclusively to gain free meals, she (generally speaking) is dating for dinner. In the same light, if one is using 'dating' exclusively to gain no-strings sex, he (generally speaking) is hooking up.
 
  Reply With Quote
nick222 is offline nick222 Post #1183  January 28,2012, 12:25pm
nick222's Avatar

Veteran

Joined: Feb 2011

Posts: 1,930

See profile

harnomygirl wrote :
You're right. We do get input from females. To me, it sounds better when a woman says she chooses to pay her way and enjoys sex, than when a man says he never pays for her and expects her to want sex.

That really shouldn't make any difference, so I'll try to get over it.
To clarify, I never expect a woman to want sex with me, because I don't assume she will be attracted to me. I also don't assume that I'll be attracted to her. Part of the purpose of a date is to determine that. It's one of many points of compatibility, however, that I date women who enjoy sex as much as I do and view it similarly. Fortunately it's not often that I date someone who isn't compatible with me in that way. Perhaps it's a demographic thing, or perhaps we're both screening well before the first date, but that's just how it works out, in my experience.

It's also not true that I never pay for her. It is true, however, that expenses are generally shared, whether that means going dutch or alternating turns paying. This isn't really something that is thought about or discussed that much. It just happens.
 
  Reply With Quote
Special-K is offline Special-K Post #1184  January 28,2012, 12:25pm
Special-K's Avatar

is happier than if it was a 'no boss Friday' going into a three-day weekend... :-)

Veteran

Joined: Aug 2010

Posts: 1,880

See profile

notyet wrote :
i'd be careful of that statement. i believe that i've seen posts by respected female members of this community who willingly split the check on the first date and yet are also open to first date sex.

that may not be your cup of tea. it certainly is not mine. but at least a few females posting here appear to find nothing wrong with it

nick222 wrote :
Ah, I see. Resort to a personal attack when your logic fails. Feel better now?
In all seriousness, I did not mean my comments to come off as a personal attack, either to you, Nick, or anyone else who posts here.

What two consenting adults agree to is their business. In any event, I would not consider this type of behavior 'dating.'
 
  Reply With Quote
nick222 is offline nick222 Post #1185  January 28,2012, 12:29pm
nick222's Avatar

Veteran

Joined: Feb 2011

Posts: 1,930

See profile

Special-K wrote :
I have dated men as young as 30 and they still follow traditional social norms where 'dating' is concerned.
So we both date people who are compatible with us. Win-win. That doesn't mean people I date are of lower quality simply because you like to do things differently. I only date women who are attractive (to me, anyway), intelligent, kind, progressive, and usually highly educated (master's degree or higher). Nothing about them is "highly undesirable" or "desperate". (Yes, those are terms that most people will view as a personal attack.)
 
  Reply With Quote
notyet is offline notyet Post #1186  January 28,2012, 12:43pm
notyet's Avatar

Power Poster

Joined: Nov 2008

Posts: 5,276

See profile

Special-K wrote :
...I did not mean my comments to come off as a personal attack... to you...
no offense taken. i just wanted to make sure you had cover. this has been a (mostly) civil (and on-topic) conversation for quite a while now. i was just trying to keep it that way.

it's all good.

>):-)
 
  Reply With Quote
Special-K is offline Special-K Post #1187  January 28,2012, 12:47pm
Special-K's Avatar

is happier than if it was a 'no boss Friday' going into a three-day weekend... :-)

Veteran

Joined: Aug 2010

Posts: 1,880

See profile

nick222 wrote :
So we both date people who are compatible with us. Win-win. That doesn't mean people I date are of lower quality simply because you like to do things differently. I only date women who are attractive (to me, anyway), intelligent, kind, progressive, and usually highly educated (master's degree or higher). Nothing about them is "highly undesirable" or "desperate". (Yes, those are terms that most people will view as a personal attack.)
While attractiveness is subjective, I meet your criterion for dating (though I am probably more traditional than progressive). Your descriptors also describe my social circle (both single and married). While we can argue semantics, I don't believe anyone I know would use 'dating' to describe what is going on in the last few posts of this thread.

If this process works for you and the women w/ whom you go out, great... mutually beneficial arrangement! If you are advertising the desire for a relationship w/ the intention of getting no-strings sex (I can see where that would get expensive for a guy who traditionally dates w/ no expectation of getting beyond date two), you are no better than a woman dating for dinner.
 
  Reply With Quote
nick222 is offline nick222 Post #1188  January 28,2012, 12:58pm
nick222's Avatar

Veteran

Joined: Feb 2011

Posts: 1,930

See profile

Special-K wrote :
(though I am probably more traditional than progressive).
Gee, ya think? This isn't about whether you meet my criteria, but okay.

Special-K wrote :
If this process works for you and the women w/ whom you go out, great... mutually beneficial arrangement! If you are advertising the desire for a relationship w/ the intention of getting no-strings sex (I can see where that would get expensive for a guy who traditionally dates w/ no expectation of getting beyond date two), you are no better than a woman dating for dinner.
You're continuing to be insulting. It's dating, or a relationship, not a "mutually beneficial arrangement". "Mutually beneficial arrangement" implies a business partnership, like the exchange of sex for money (or for meals, for that matter). It's the exact opposite of that. It's a relationship of equal partners who enjoy sex as part of their relationship and who pay for their own things, as modern grownups do. Most of my relationships have started this way, including the ones that have lasted for years. Most of my friends' relationships, including marriages, started this way. It's dating, just as your style is dating. Mine just isn't stuck in 1945.

Now, if you don't mind, I'm off to my girlfriend's place. We'll probably have sex tonight, just like we did on our second date over a year ago. She's paying for dinner. (I paid last time.) Have a good Saturday night.
 
  Reply With Quote
Special-K is offline Special-K Post #1189  January 28,2012, 1:41pm
Special-K's Avatar

is happier than if it was a 'no boss Friday' going into a three-day weekend... :-)

Veteran

Joined: Aug 2010

Posts: 1,880

See profile

nick222 wrote :
Gee, ya think? This isn't about whether you meet my criteria, but okay.

I was simply trying to illustrate that you and I are not so demographically different.

You're continuing to be insulting. It's dating, or a relationship, not a "mutually beneficial arrangement". "Mutually beneficial arrangement" implies a business partnership, like the exchange of sex for money (or for meals, for that matter). It's the exact opposite of that. It's a relationship of equal partners who enjoy sex as part of their relationship and who pay for their own things, as modern grownups do. Most of my relationships have started this way, including the ones that have lasted for years. Most of my friends' relationships, including marriages, started this way. It's dating, just as your style is dating. Mine just isn't stuck in 1945.

Now, if you don't mind, I'm off to my girlfriend's place. We'll probably have sex tonight, just like we did on our second date over a year ago. She's paying for dinner. (I paid last time.) Have a good Saturday night.

Why are we having this debate? You're no longer 'dating.' You have moved beyond the initial dating phase of which I have been referring and now have a gf, at which point, all responsibilities are (or should be) shared.
Have a good night, Nick!
 
  Reply With Quote
inthevagueschemeofthings is offline inthevagueschemeofthings Post #1190  February 19,2012, 3:52pm
inthevaguesch…'s Avatar

Newbie

Joined: Oct 2011

Posts: 38

See profile

As a man, I always offer to pay. However, you must understand the predicament that a guy faces on a dinner date. If he foots the bill, he has ulterior motives. If he suggests going Dutch, he's a cheapskate. It's a no-win situation.
This wasn't an issue in 1912, but I doubt anyone wants to go back a hundred years.
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Topics
Topic Topic Starter Board Replies Last Post
who pays for what??? NewYorkLady Dating 100 October 2,2010 4:01pm
Why are there so many threads on who pays on dates? JMCoetzee Dating 65 May 9,2010 7:31am
Money spent on a carwash VS. Money spent on a dress...who pays for dinner?! Shads Dating 143 March 5,2010 10:14am
Dating and money. Who pays for what???? katsquirrel Ask a Dating Expert 9 February 25,2010 12:30pm
Who Pays? CLK430 Dating 153 November 11,2009 4:25pm

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“but isnt' "comedy" subjective?” –  richey

Join the “I think I blew it...” discussion

“"So, at what point did you decide I was only going to be a one-date kind of guy?" Hi Carole, I am late to this thread. Thanks for such an interesting topic! My initial reaction was to think ... ” –  SearchingHoping

Join the “My first "Matchmaker" date” discussion

“A little tough love... The lesson here: date married men at your own peril. The man was married when YOU began a relationship with him! You keep calling him divorced. Not when you were with him. Once ... ” –  emma_hazards

Join the “Reuniting with EX” discussion

“Thanks, DancingFool!!!!! I deleted all but 2 pics. I kept the 2 most recent pics. I will work on updating pics soon, hopefully this weekend. Thanks! Suzanne” –  SuzanneScorpio

Join the “Photo Review” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 6:42pm.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0