What does chemistry mean to you?


Reply
  • Page 1 of 3
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
 
Topic Tools Search this Thread
my5cents is offline my5cents Post #1  March 24,2010, 10:24pm
my5cents's Avatar

Enthusiast

Joined: Mar 2008

California

Posts: 655

See profile

When I met my ex boyfriend we had amazing chemistry, we just "clicked" so to speak and got along splendidly. I think in some way it made us blind to some of our foundational differences which we discovered over time. Since then I've had chemistry with certain men but have known that they would not be a good fit for me. That made me decide not to date them.

I think over time I am realizing that sometimes you have to look for foundational similarities and from that I am hoping that "zing" or chemistry can grow. What do you all think? I have had guy friends who I've been friends with for a time, and then all of sudden it's there! So I'm actually changing my mind to think that it can grow and build, but I am wondering how much time do you give it? Any thoughts or input on chemistry building over time vs. being split second immediate?
 
  Reply With Quote
2clueless is offline 2clueless Post #2  March 24,2010, 11:06pm
2clueless's Avatar

says Festivus for the rest of us!

Pacesetter

Joined: Sep 2008

Posts: 437

See profile

For me chemistry means that I feel passion physically for my mate, we vibe intellectually and we share certain core values including a shared definition of commitment. I need all three of those at this stage in my life in order to go forward with someone. I need those three things to emerge within a reasonable time frame early in a relationship. Those things will never emerge from my small pool of male friendships because our relationship is totally 100% platonic.

You can't have chemistry without biology. You can water the soil all you want but certain things won't grow if there is no seed there to begin with. (Unless your soil is from Monsanto.)
 
  Reply With Quote
richey is offline richey Post #3  March 25,2010, 12:45am
richey's Avatar

Virtuoso

Joined: Aug 2009

san francisco, ca

Posts: 2,727

See profile

I dunno.. to me "chemistry" means there's just something that keeps pulling you towards each other - whether you know what it is or why.

As far as chemistry developing vs just being there... I dont' really know the answer either. Chemistry has burnt me a few times in some of my choices, and some of the best relationships I've had it seemed to build over time.

I think, as with anything, the truth lies somewhere in the middle. I do think there must be some immediate component for it to even happen ~ but how much needs to be there immediately.. I don't know. I also think it builds over time as well. And I think it's the "building" component that is more important and more influential in the long run.

But I definitely do think something has to be there from the get go (again... it may only be a small amount and very subtle.. I'm not sure).

Richiro
Last edited by richey; March 25,2010 at 12:48am.
 
  Reply With Quote
suzyblueeyes is offline suzyblueeyes Post #4  March 25,2010, 5:57am
suzyblueeyes's Avatar

is engaged

Enthusiast

Joined: Dec 2008

USA

Posts: 855

See profile

I don't consider chemistry to be "wow I think you're hot", but instead "there's something about you that I just can't get enough of". I think it has a little to do with liking a man's pheromones, and a lot to do with conversation that flows easily.

I've never had chemistry develop over time, but I don't think it's outside of the realm of possibility. However, I would say that the ideal would be to find someone with whom you share fundamental values and have quick intense chemistry.
 
  Reply With Quote
DancingFool is offline DancingFool Post #5  March 25,2010, 7:41am
DancingFool's Avatar

Power Poster

Joined: Jan 2009

Posts: 5,730

See profile

2clueless wrote :
For me chemistry means that I feel passion physically for my mate, we vibe intellectually and we share certain core values including a shared definition of commitment. I need all three of those at this stage in my life in order to go forward with someone. I need those three things to emerge within a reasonable time frame early in a relationship. Those things will never emerge from my small pool of male friendships because our relationship is totally 100% platonic.

You can't have chemistry without biology. You can water the soil all you want but certain things won't grow if there is no seed there to begin with. (Unless your soil is from Monsanto.)
Can't say it any better than this.
 
  Reply With Quote
nightling is offline nightling Post #6  March 25,2010, 7:42am
nightling's Avatar

all I'll leave are smoke rings in the dark.

Power Poster

Joined: Sep 2009

Misery

Posts: 6,939

See profile

Chemistry is, according to the research, based on the DNA of the two people involved. The hypothesis is that women are seeking men who will produce high-quality offspring, so they need to be able to sense who has the right genes for the best offspring.

The articles I've read suggests most women sense this by smell or taste. Seems to match my experience, personally. I can usually tell whether there's "chemistry" very soon after meeting. That doesn't mean I will want to date them, however. Lot of other factors come into play on that besides just chemistry. I have met some people who I had chemistry with but couldn't stand to look at em bc their attitude was poor.

I do not think chemistry really develops over time. I wish it did. There have been some pretty nice guys I'd have liked to have had chemistry with, but didn't. I think chemistry really is there or not there from the start, but you may notice it more over time bc of the way the whole dopamine system and romantic attachments work.

Men, btw, are not as good at sensing chemistry as women. I think this is likely due to their differing goals in the biological game. In general, quantity versus quality. (I'm not judging so don't get mad!) The research suggests their attraction goes mostly off visuals that indicate fertility and health. Waist to hip ratios, things like that.

So a picture is pretty good for them to determine their attraction. But it's insufficient for most women.

I am just summarizing here from various articles I've read on the subject, but a lot of fits personal experience, so I think they are getting it right.
 
  Reply With Quote
jayjay is offline jayjay Post #7  March 25,2010, 10:27am
jayjay's Avatar

...things seem to have gotten quiet around here.

Sage

Joined: Jun 2008

Brownsville, TX

Posts: 10,932

See profile

nightling wrote :
Chemistry is, according to the research, based on the DNA of the two people involved. The hypothesis is that women are seeking men who will produce high-quality offspring, so they need to be able to sense who has the right genes for the best offspring.
I think this is a pretty limited view. Certainly chemistry and DNA have a significant role....but if that was all that went into attraction there wouldn't be tons of women throwing themselves at skanky rock stars with horrible DNA. It seems pretty common that behavior plays a big role in what is attractive, especially for wo men.
 
  Reply With Quote
JohnnyVal is offline JohnnyVal Post #8  March 25,2010, 11:05am
JohnnyVal's Avatar

Newbie

Joined: Mar 2010

Posts: 3

See profile

All my relationships started with chemistry. Not physical attraction, or any other kinda thing. It's what makes me wanna be closer. The best chemistry I ever had was with a woman I still love who still loves me. We were separated by circumstance and met only once since then. If I saw her again, Id propose on the spot. Unless she's married.
 
  Reply With Quote
PY_2 is offline PY_2 Post #9  March 25,2010, 11:20am

Unregistered

Joined: Oct 2009

Posts: 6,908

See profile

Chemistry to me: Something very vague and subjective that many people use to over complicate dating process.

I dont live my dating life (or lack thereof lol) by that word.
Last edited by PY_2; March 25,2010 at 11:39am. Reason: adding.
 
  Reply With Quote
nightling is offline nightling Post #10  March 25,2010, 12:12pm
nightling's Avatar

all I'll leave are smoke rings in the dark.

Power Poster

Joined: Sep 2009

Misery

Posts: 6,939

See profile

jayjay wrote :
I think this is a pretty limited view. Certainly chemistry and DNA have a significant role....but if that was all that went into attraction there wouldn't be tons of women throwing themselves at skanky rock stars with horrible DNA. It seems pretty common that behavior plays a big role in what is attractive, especially for wo men.
Are sure that has anything to do with their chemistry? I just figured it had more to do with their money ...

I'm going with the things that match my personal experience of it. /shrug
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply
  • Page 1 of 3
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Topics
Topic Topic Starter Board Replies Last Post
Lots of similarities but no chemistry..? greentea_girl Dating 35 August 2,2010 10:33pm
chemistry notyet Christian Singles 8 January 2,2010 2:34pm
Chemistry? zurbrj1 30 something and never married 1 October 25,2009 1:28am
Question About Chemistry KittyLu Using eHarmony 21 August 26,2009 8:58pm
Chemistry, Compatibility... and Divorce last12C Relationships 221 July 19,2009 2:22pm

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“my husband died when our son was 30 months old. It still seems to be a central tenet of his relationship with the world. dragging past the cancer for the last 2 years and trying to reassure ... ” –  lada2

Join the “Has anyone lost their mother at a young age? How did it change your life?...or did it?” discussion

“What I hate is when i have said "It was nice to meet you." Then I have had the guy jump in and say "You too. I'd like to see you again." And then I am standing there looking for a way to tell him ... ” –  legend29

Join the “Saying what you mean...” discussion

“I've had the "wanna chat" message more than once.” –  Simplicity-2012

Join the “RED flags for women” discussion

“I thoroughly enjoy being an emotionally unhealthy and immature man!” –  Raw_Truth

Join the “Anyone ever try a professional matchmaker?” discussion

“i suspect he is not agonizing over it nearly as much as you are. i suffer from the stereotypical thinkking that guys are fine with separating feelings from yearnings Right up until they're not. ... ” –  D_Lion

Join the “Question on casual dating?” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 9:12pm.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0