nightling is offline nightling Post #191  November 5,2009, 7:35pm
nightling's Avatar

all I'll leave are smoke rings in the dark.

Power Poster

Joined: Sep 2009

Misery

Posts: 6,901

See profile

Supporting your child is simply a matter of loving him or her.
 
  Reply With Quote
D_Lion is online now D_Lion Post #192  November 5,2009, 7:41pm
D_Lion's Avatar

- Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Joined: Aug 2008

NJ

Posts: 30,727

See profile

peg099 wrote :
So it's all or nothing? Either the household income remains the same or it is completely absent?

I know that this is probably beyond your comprehension, but even though kids do need basic material needs provided for them, they have non-material needs as well. It's not only an issue of income - it's an issue of balancing all their needs with economic realities.

Thanks, now that I have made 20 posts (all getting one star) stating this.

Economic reality means I cannot afford to provide for more than one house. Economic reality means affordibility of children rests upon two incomes in the household. Economic reality means persons who dump their partner do not deserve their partner's money!

I get that children need other things, like demonstration of the importance of work ethic. I figure I am good with that.
 
  Reply With Quote
Gumbee is offline Gumbee Post #193  November 5,2009, 7:48pm
Gumbee's Avatar

No nit too small to pick

Quick Study

Joined: Sep 2009

Earth

Posts: 172

See profile

Deleted by choice
Last edited by Gumbee; November 6,2009 at 7:20am. Reason: Slept on it. Decided against it
 
  Reply With Quote
cardguy is offline cardguy Post #194  November 5,2009, 7:52pm
cardguy's Avatar

Veteran

Joined: Aug 2009

Oregon

Posts: 1,226

See profile

I might point out again that your original position was that child support was always terrible, that apparently it always involves women who leave their husbands and collect checks for a living after that.

Just to clarify: is your statement about all child support or just those cases where the woman is trying to squeeze a life out of her husband's work? Also, do you agree that child support payments vary greatly and usually do not result in the non-custodial parent contributing 50% of the cost of raising their child?
 
  Reply With Quote
marguitar is offline marguitar Post #195  November 5,2009, 8:00pm
marguitar's Avatar

respite is a beautiful thing...

Quick Study

Joined: Sep 2009

Wisconsin

Posts: 141

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
Sure glad I make the right decision before hand. It's best not to take these risks at all.
"The person who risks nothing, does nothing, has nothing, is nothing, and becomes nothing. He may avoid suffering and sorrow, but he simply cannot learn and feel and change and grow and love and LIVE!
-Leo Buscaglia
 
  Reply With Quote
D_Lion is online now D_Lion Post #196  November 5,2009, 8:03pm
D_Lion's Avatar

- Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Joined: Aug 2008

NJ

Posts: 30,727

See profile

I state that my values are that payments never be made to ex-partners, for any "reason."

That costs of children rest with the person having possession, and that the person without possession has no economic obligation.

That the detail provided in many posts is far beyond what my salary can provide, and that expenses in excess of what I can provide are not appropriate, regardless of what was available prior to marital dissolution or that the ex-partner wants.

Further, I state that a person should never have a government-mandated expense which causes extraordinary hardship, such as losing one's home or being deprived of his income.
 
  Reply With Quote
peg099 is offline peg099 Post #197  November 5,2009, 8:06pm
peg099's Avatar

Sage

Joined: Sep 2008

Canada

Posts: 12,516

See profile

marguitar wrote :
"The person who risks nothing, does nothing, has nothing, is nothing, and becomes nothing. He may avoid suffering and sorrow, but he simply cannot learn and feel and change and grow and love and LIVE!
-Leo Buscaglia
Great quote!
 
  Reply With Quote
clearlyoblique is offline clearlyoblique Post #198  November 5,2009, 8:20pm
clearlyobliqu…'s Avatar

is retiring

Virtuoso

Joined: Jan 2009

Posts: 2,719

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
Thanks, now that I have made 20 posts (all getting one star) stating this.

Economic reality means I cannot afford to provide for more than one house. Economic reality means affordibility of children rests upon two incomes in the household. Economic reality means persons who dump their partner do not deserve their partner's money!

I get that children need other things, like demonstration of the importance of work ethic. I figure I am good with that.
OMG! I missed a few.

*CO scampers off to one-star other Pon Farr inspired posting lunacy.*
Last edited by clearlyoblique; November 5,2009 at 8:57pm. Reason: Incidentally, not all your posts were rated. But I hate to see you exaggerate, so I fixed it for ya!
 
  Reply With Quote
TinkerKat is offline TinkerKat Post #199  November 5,2009, 8:20pm
TinkerKat's Avatar

is thinking....dangerous, I know....

Virtuoso

Joined: May 2008

Neverland, 2nd star to the right

Posts: 4,209

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
I state that my values are that payments never be made to ex-partners, for any "reason."

That costs of children rest with the person having possession, and that theperson without possession has no economic obligation.

That the detail provided in many posts is far beyond what my salary can provide, and that expenses in excess of what I can provide are not appropriate, regardless of what was available prior to marital dissolution or that the ex-partner wants.

Further, I state that a person should never have a government-mandated expense which causes extraordinary hardship, such as losing one's home or being deprived of his income.
Ok, in my case, my ex was the sole source of income and he volunteered 80% of his income because he did not want possession of the children. So he wasn't being deprived by a goverment mandate, he knew upfront what he would have to live off of and he choose to sign the divorce papers. And he choose to give up any and all physical possession of our children. And even though he's entitled to full visitation, he refuses to fulfill that obligation of the divorce degree.
 
  Reply With Quote
Wonderwoman402 is offline Wonderwoman402 Post #200  November 5,2009, 8:21pm
Wonderwoman40…'s Avatar

L'Chayim!

Virtuoso

Joined: Jan 2009

Omaha, NE

Posts: 4,376

See profile

sabete2002 wrote :
Again, "thousands" of $$$? For Tae Kwan Do??? Where are you getting these numbers from?
What I paid for TaeKwonDo lessons for my daughter, in the midwest:

$94/month + $80 extra every other month for testing + one-time expense for gear, patches on uniform, etc. It took about 3 years to earn her black belt. Totals right around $5,000. More if you want to include the mileage cost of getting her to the lessons.

Pride in my daughter, and her self-confidence in accomplishing that goal = priceless.
 
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Topic Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new topics
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Topics
Topic Topic Starter Board Replies Last Post
Secure call is worthless to buy passat1 Using eHarmony 13 February 3,2011 12:24pm
Shall I call, email, or not? funnyengineergal Dating 65 October 6,2009 8:56pm
To Call or Not to Call islandrain80 Dating 9 September 15,2009 2:38pm
Do I go on the date or trust my gut? Seriousminded 40 plus singles 18 September 5,2009 8:44pm
Wait for him to call or just call them? jeeknx 40 Something 7 August 13,2009 12:57pm

Looking for a Great Relationship?

Get started now. Fill out this form and take the questionnaire to receive your matches.

First Name:

I'm a:
seeking

Postal Code:

Country:

Email:

Confirm Email:

Password:


How did you hear about us?


Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“It's important to understand the way a site works. Rigidly assuming / insisting that eH works likes all the others you're used to isn't utilizing the site functions to your best advantage. No.... ... ” –  Wiseman2

Join the “First contact on eHarmony, smile, questions, email?” discussion

“ If you have yet to meet, you don't know him or whether you two will form a connection. Connections formed over e-mail tend to be fantasies. You will see this echoed over and over by experienced ... ” –  shapeShifter79

Join the “How do i recoonect with him again?” discussion

“ Then it's a bit premature to worry about being friend-zoned. The first step is to go out on dates! What specific steps did you try? How many women did you ask out in person? Did you buy a ... ” –  shapeShifter79

Join the “For women to answer: How to avoid the friend zone” discussion

“ This is an old thread. She asked this in 2010. By now they are likely very exclusive or very over. ” –  shapeShifter79

Join the “is there a reason to ask if we're exclusive?” discussion

“ I'm sure he wouldn't get that. And I can't be sure that was the actual message. But it sems kind of likely to me.” –  boomer_gal

Join the “Why am I not successful?” discussion

“Hi eccemuliere and welcome to eHA.On an internet forum like eHA, you're going to get a wide variety of responses; some you'll like and some you won't. It's best to focus on the ones that speak to ... ” –  Sassafras54

Join the “Being blown off, or something else?” discussion

“ Although I have ignored my gut at times, in hindsight it's always been right, in terms of recognizing bad choices. QUOTE] But once we realize our past mistakes, we can use our reason to clue us ... ” –  eccemuliere

Join the “Is Your Gut Leading - or Misleading You?” discussion



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 7:34am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0