Advice and Support from Thousands of Users Just Like You

About You Your healthy mind, body, and spirit play a vital role in all the important relationships of your life. Share your advice and insights here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
LizziePooh's Avatar

LizziePooh would enjoy a song.

Power Poster

Join Date: May 2008

Posts: 5,196

See profile

I call you Diana of Troy ... you know that, LizziePooh, right?

I've often thought of D as Spock. But since he's experiencing Pon farr ... I really think we should ignore him until he gets ... um ...

What ever ... he ... um ... needs.
lol! Are you a trekking?? Isn't it Deanna Troi?? My old roommate was in love with her - you can call me that anytime!

I had to look up Pon Farr!! Can frogs get in heat?? Hope he uses protection. lol!!
- November 5th, 2009, 08:11 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#181   Reply With Quote
cardguy's Avatar

Enthusiast

Join Date: Aug 2009

Posts: 784

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
Wrong.

The single most important factor is maintenance of the income stream. Without income children are living on the street and computing the market value of selling sex.
Yes, of course if you are neglecting yourself to the point that you can't hold down your job, of course that will hurt your kids. However, I think that you'll find that if you take inventory of what is truly necessary and what is desirable, the absolutely necessary is far less than your actual expenditures. For example: living in a 3 bedroom house by yourself. Certainly desirable....not even close to necessary. If you're in a position to own a house, you have enough money to support a child. Raising a child certainly has consequences for your standard of living,

The idea that your child should be the secondary priority is poppycock. A parent's needs take precedence only so far as they are necessary for the child's needs.

Last edited by cardguy; November 5th, 2009 at 08:14 pm.
- November 5th, 2009, 08:11 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#182   Reply With Quote
D_Lion's Avatar

D_Lion - Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 14,318

See profile

LizziePooh wrote :
So DL - what age would your child (if you had one) have to have their own income stream to pay for stuff like food, clothes, sports, movies, etc?

I'm not sure.

My initial answer is that this would depend heavily on my income, my partner's income, and unforeseeable expenses (such as number of relocations or changes in employment benefits, which altered my cash flow projections.)

I am not aligned with an idea of not supporting children, but I am also not aligned with providing to children luxuries which I can not afford for myself. Keeping in mind, that "sports, movies," etc are things I cannot afford, I do not consider them justified for a child.

Survival expenses associated with a resident child, I do not see an upper cut-off age. Entertainments, I do nto see funding at any age, unless I were rather well off indeed.
- November 5th, 2009, 08:12 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#183   Reply With Quote
clearlyoblique's Avatar

clearlyoblique is smoking crayola

Virtuoso

Join Date: Jan 2009

Posts: 2,661

See profile

I'm not sure what the procedure is for neutering frogs. Now, I think he needs to practice precautions just like anyone ... but I just can't recommend any more strongly that he return to Vulcan. Like: now.

Last edited by clearlyoblique; November 5th, 2009 at 09:54 pm. Reason: Vulcans are just so hard to write about ...
- November 5th, 2009, 08:13 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#184   Reply With Quote
D_Lion's Avatar

D_Lion - Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 14,318

See profile

LizziePooh wrote :
Yes! exactly! And that is why I think DL is wrong on filtering women who let him pay - if someone offered to pay for dinner, he would let them. So he should be appreciating that same value in his women. lol!

All Ladies have now entered the twilight zone.
- November 5th, 2009, 08:15 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#185   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

LizziePooh's Avatar

LizziePooh would enjoy a song.

Power Poster

Join Date: May 2008

Posts: 5,196

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
I'm not sure.

My initial answer is that this would depend heavily on my income, my partner's income, and unforeseeable expenses (such as number of relocations or changes in employment benefits, which altered my cash flow projections.)

I am not aligned with an idea of not supporting children, but I am also not aligned with providing to children luxuries which I can not afford for myself. Keeping in mind, that "sports, movies," etc are things I cannot afford, I do not consider them justified for a child.

Survival expenses associated with a resident child, I do not see an upper cut-off age. Entertainments, I do nto see funding at any age, unless I were rather well off indeed.
So out of curiosity - is your personal internet access a luxury or a necessity for your employment? Also, if you can not afford luxury items, how do you justify fine-dining expenses? Is it rationalized because you only do that on a date and it is justified because there is some value to it that you see in choosing a partner?

(And I do mean these questions seriously)
- November 5th, 2009, 08:16 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#186   Reply With Quote
sabete2002's Avatar

sabete2002 Happy 2010!!

Veteran

Join Date: Jun 2008

Posts: 2,339

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
I'm not sure.

My initial answer is that this would depend heavily on my income, my partner's income, and unforeseeable expenses (such as number of relocations or changes in employment benefits, which altered my cash flow projections.)

I am not aligned with an idea of not supporting children, but I am also not aligned with providing to children luxuries which I can not afford for myself. Keeping in mind, that "sports, movies," etc are things I cannot afford, I do not consider them justified for a child.

Survival expenses associated with a resident child, I do not see an upper cut-off age. Entertainments, I do nto see funding at any age, unless I were rather well off indeed.
That's just it! We give our kids these "extras" only based on our ability to provide them. For example, if my two want the named brand clothes (Abercrombie springs to mind) they earn the money for the extra it costs for a pair of jeans from there as opposed to Old Navy which is where I typically buy their stuff (don't worry, I have teenagers - I'm not sending little ones out to work!). We're all living within our means here.
- November 5th, 2009, 08:18 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#187   Reply With Quote
D_Lion's Avatar

D_Lion - Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 14,318

See profile

sabete2002 wrote :
For those men and women who chose to have children, there is a moral obligation to provide for said children equally whether married or divorced.
Fine personal opinion, but there is not the means!That is an absolute. Household loses income equals less money!
- November 5th, 2009, 08:20 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#188   Reply With Quote
peg099's Avatar

peg099 has fallen and he landed beside me :)

Sage

Join Date: Sep 2008

Posts: 11,949

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
Wrong.

The single most important factor is maintenance of the income stream. Without income children are living on the street and computing the market value of selling sex.
So it's all or nothing? Either the household income remains the same or it is completely absent?

I know that this is probably beyond your comprehension, but even though kids do need basic material needs provided for them, they have non-material needs as well. It's not only an issue of income - it's an issue of balancing all their needs with economic realities.
- November 5th, 2009, 08:31 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#189   Reply With Quote
D_Lion's Avatar

D_Lion - Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 14,318

See profile

LizziePooh wrote :
So out of curiosity - is your personal internet access a luxury or a necessity for your employment? Also, if you can not afford luxury items, how do you justify fine-dining expenses? Is it rationalized because you only do that on a date and it is justified because there is some value to it that you see in choosing a partner?

(And I do mean these questions seriously)

Internet is a borderline expense for me; it is one of my three largest costs which are not a survival essential (the others are women and alcohol.) Internet is an essential for conducting banking, bill paying, and job search activities (more precisely, it is cheaper than driving to the library to do those things, which makes it an essential.)

Yes, I only eat out with a partner (I cook well myself, so there is not a quality gain to go out.) When going out, I do expect a meal to be at the quality of what I can make myself, and the atmosphere to be what I expect; this puts me in a certain price point.
- November 5th, 2009, 08:33 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#190   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shall I call, email, or not? funnyengineergal Dating 65 October 6th, 2009 09:56 pm
To Call or Not to Call islandrain80 Dating 9 September 15th, 2009 03:38 pm
Secure call is worthless to buy passat1 Using eHarmony 0 August 16th, 2009 11:44 am

Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“You didn't fail. Sometimes letting go is the ultimate act of love. It's up to him whether he chooses to view that as one more person letting him down, or whether losing you is a wake-up call (or part ... ” – peg099

Join the “It's over.” discussion

“From what I can tell, she seems very interested in you. "Hitting on" means interest in more than friendship. She has done a lot of initiating, giving you tons of signals, and now you just need to ... ” – my5cents

Join the “Met this girl at an activity group and confused once again.” discussion

“Wow...and I had always heard that the worst thing to when walking into a dealership was to immediately fall in love with the car. Boy, was that advice misguided!” – Rustman

Join the “I fell in love with my car salesman,someone help me” discussion

“No, you are missing the point that I was commenting on another aspect of it. Was my post that hard to understand? BTW, if the message she sent was the worse thing anyone ever said, that wouldn't be ... ” – Rustman

Join the “Stay Classy Matches” discussion

“I wish I could tell you Yuppa since I've never accepted one, I'm not quite sure how it does work. I'm assuming it's where your phone number and your match's phone number are hidden from one another. ... ” – my5cents

Join the “free weekend coming up” discussion

“There are men who run away if they find out a woman is widowed rather than divorced? How messed up is that? Do women do this, too?” – mrflyer

Join the “widow or single?” discussion

“I think it takes some time to decide if I personally am attracted to a guy. So I take that time in the initial meeting to find out more about him and to see if we have somewhat of a connection. As ... ” – my5cents

Join the “Ladies, do you decide in the first 30 seconds if you're interetsed? And, what are you looking for in a first impression?” discussion



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:32 am.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0