Advice and Support from Thousands of Users Just Like You

About You Your healthy mind, body, and spirit play a vital role in all the important relationships of your life. Share your advice and insights here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
D_Lion's Avatar

D_Lion - Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 14,305

See profile

chawks64 wrote :
It's not their fault and it shouldn't be their punishment.

It's not my fault my wife left me, cheated on me, etc, and it shouldn't be my punishment.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:33 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#131   Reply With Quote
peg099's Avatar

peg099 has fallen and he landed beside me :)

Sage

Join Date: Sep 2008

Posts: 11,943

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
This thread has really made me mad. I work hard, for very little; all of it is needed for my own, tenuous, survival. There is nothing left - let alone the majority of it - for paying an idle woman!
So don't have kids with an 'idle' woman.

And yeah, if you can't afford to have kids (i.e. you need all your income for your own tenuous survival), then by all means, don't have them. Those are your individual circumstances.

What most of us are saying is that people (men and women) who do choose to have kids need to step up to the reponsibility of raising those kids - regardless of what happens to the marriage. You don't get to abdicate your responsibility to your children simply because you're ticked off at their mother.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:40 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#132   Reply With Quote
neardc's Avatar

neardc What year is it again?

Volunteer Community Leader

Join Date: Jun 2008

Posts: 5,473

See profile

Why do you assume that you will have to pay "thousands of dollars a month" if it's based on a formula that considers your income and expenses as well as those of your ex? If someone is in fact on the verge of homelessness (as you assert you are) and their income is in fact very low (i.e., far below the median income for your area -- so significantly below $50k or so), then that would be taken into account. And in fact, it could well be the case that the ex-wife would be the one paying child support to the lower earning ex-husband if she in fact is the higher wage earner.

Think of it this way. Monthly child support would be less than you currently pay for those first dinner dates you take women on.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:42 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#133   Reply With Quote
peg099's Avatar

peg099 has fallen and he landed beside me :)

Sage

Join Date: Sep 2008

Posts: 11,943

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
It's not my fault my wife left me, cheated on me, etc, and it shouldn't be my punishment.
Wow. No baggage huh?

And yet you assume that this hypothetical wife will have cheated on you, abandoned you, etc.

Aren't assumptions without factual evidence your very definition of baggage?
- November 5th, 2009, 06:44 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#134   Reply With Quote
cardguy's Avatar

Enthusiast

Join Date: Aug 2009

Posts: 784

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
Paying thousands of dollars per month to an ex-partner, nonimally as "child support," is in fact paying for her house. (Usually his house, while he is left depending on daddy or living in inappropriate, sub-standard housing.)
Again, this statement is clearly coming from emotion rather than hard data...do you have any idea what child support payments are typically like, as well as how much expense is typically incurred by having a child?

D_Lion wrote :
Since I do not have anybody to subsidize me, I would be homeless if any portion of my pay were taken. I consider this unjust.
You also wouldn't have any child-related expenses beyond your monthly child support payment. Guess who takes the bigger economic hit once the bills are in?

D_Lion wrote :
This thread has really made me mad. I work hard, for very little; all of it is needed for my own, tenuous, survival. There is nothing left - let alone the majority of it - for paying an idle woman!
Again, an emotional reaction without any precious data...what happened to that rational viewpoint?

The bottom line is that being the person who keeps a child after a divorce is not a winning proposition economically, and your illusion of women living a life of luxury off of child support payments is (with rare exceptions I'm sure) a wild fantasy.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:49 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#135   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

D_Lion's Avatar

D_Lion - Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 14,305

See profile

peg099 wrote :
You don't get to abdicate your responsibility to your children simply because you're ticked off at their mother.

And you shouldn't be forced to subsidize the (errant) mother in perpetuity simply due to having had a child, which is what the sensible men are upset over.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:51 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#136   Reply With Quote
neardc's Avatar

neardc What year is it again?

Volunteer Community Leader

Join Date: Jun 2008

Posts: 5,473

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
And you shouldn't be forced to subsidize the (errant) mother in perpetuity simply due to having had a child, which is what the sensible men are upset over.
Once again, that is not child support. It has nothing to do with child support. You are confusing the issue of child support and alimony/spousal support. (Financial) child support only continues until the child is of age. It does not continue into perpetuity, just as it does not in the case of intact marriages.

And, once again, there is no reason to believe that the ex-wife will be an "errant" mother; most clearly are not.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:57 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#137   Reply With Quote
peg099's Avatar

peg099 has fallen and he landed beside me :)

Sage

Join Date: Sep 2008

Posts: 11,943

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
And you shouldn't be forced to subsidize the (errant) mother in perpetuity simply due to having had a child, which is what the sensible men are upset over.
Once again, an assumption that the mother is errant.

And again, a total inability to place the needs of the child ahead of your own anger.

And a total inability to consider this issue based on facts instead of your own emotional response.

I don't know any sensible man who has a problem with contributing to the raising of children he chose to have. I do, however, know some men (and women) who are incapable of getting past their anger at their ex in order to do what's in the best interest of the child.

It's not about punishing one or another of the parents. It's about doing the best possible thing for the child in less than ideal circumstances.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:57 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#138   Reply With Quote
cardguy's Avatar

Enthusiast

Join Date: Aug 2009

Posts: 784

See profile

How about this?

I will readily grant that a man signing over $2100 a month out of a $2700 paycheck while his ex is capable of working but has decided to walk out the door and collect checks for a living is unfair.

Having acknowledged that, can we also acknowledge that if and when that does happen, it is the extreme exception and not the norm? You don't have to take my word for it, there are many child support calculators available online.

Can we leave the straw man behind and talk about the normal, average case?
- November 5th, 2009, 07:02 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#139   Reply With Quote
D_Lion's Avatar

D_Lion - Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 14,305

See profile

Sure glad I make the right decision before hand. It's best not to take these risks at all.
- November 5th, 2009, 07:02 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#140   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shall I call, email, or not? funnyengineergal Dating 65 October 6th, 2009 09:56 pm
To Call or Not to Call islandrain80 Dating 9 September 15th, 2009 03:38 pm
Secure call is worthless to buy passat1 Using eHarmony 0 August 16th, 2009 11:44 am

Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“ Winn, that was an absolutely wonderful post (not this one... not that I'm saying this one was bad... but you know what I'm talking about lol) ANYWAY how amazing to have a love like that. I'm so ... ” – SweetKatieA

Join the “No Valentines” discussion

“Oh dear. He played you like a violin. I'm sorry. A suit and an overly-friendly manner does not make a person a top-notch catch. His behaviour was inappropriate, no doubt about that. I do think, ... ” – lindseyk

Join the “I fell in love with my car salesman,someone help me” discussion

“I'm very confused by your post. You are already talking and meeting and whatever, so why question your decision of what you have already done. Maybe if you broke it down for us a bit more? I did ... ” – AndieIsMe

Join the “Help” discussion

“Went on a date with the new beau and got very literally snowed in at his place. The roads were not passible all weekend, so what was supposed to be a twenty four hour date turned into a long weekend ... ” – suzyblueeyes

Join the “Monday, February 8th weekend and date roundup!” discussion

“ I'm not sure what his work hours have to do with it. If you're in OC, you can send him a message and see what's up... better than asking us.” – mrflyer

Join the “Close or leave open?” discussion

“I'm posting in a hurry before I've got to run out, my apologies. Two things to hopefully clarify! I was speaking in the hypothethetical when I mentioned anyone I may see as 'husband ... ” – lucky173

Join the “That WAS a compliment... I think?!” discussion

“once you've read questions a guy has sent to you in eHarmony, and we don't hear back from you for 24-48 hours, why shouldn't we close you? Lack of reply within 1-2 days communicates lack of ... ” – mrflyer

Join the “Ladies, do you decide in the first 30 seconds if you're interetsed? And, what are you looking for in a first impression?” discussion

“ lol I want to kiss whomever one starred me. It made me giggle. Thank you my friend. You just told me to f off without really saying the word. ” – SweetKatieA

Join the “The F*Bomb!! On a FIRST Date? Are we Cool like that!!” discussion



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:32 pm.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0