Advice and Support from Thousands of Users Just Like You

About You Your healthy mind, body, and spirit play a vital role in all the important relationships of your life. Share your advice and insights here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
D_Lion's Avatar

D_Lion - Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 14,318

See profile

cardguy wrote :
You're going to have to elaborate here in order for this post to make any sort of sense...

I've tried too many times already.

I am unable to afford two houses. I am unable to afford housing, utilities, et.al., for another household. I checked my paycheck and it's just as true now as it was five minutes ago.

There are no circumstance in which buying a life of idle luxury for an ex-partner fits to my income. Her idleness means my homelessness. I do not accept any argument that that is a just outcome for any reason - let alone her abondoning me.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:05 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#121   Reply With Quote
chawks64's Avatar

chawks64 is trying very hard to be patient. Definitely not my best talent.

Power Poster

Join Date: Jun 2008

Posts: 5,216

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
I've tried too many times already.

I am unable to afford two houses. I am unable to afford housing, utilities, et.al., for another household. I checked my paycheck and it's just as true now as it was five minutes ago.

There are no circumstance in which buying a life of idle luxury for an ex-partner fits to my income. Her idleness means my homelessness. I do not accept any argument that that is a just outcome for any reason - let alone her abondoning me.
Not once in that entire post did you mention your future son or daughter.

Your only concern was that your ex not be rewarded for leaving.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:10 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#122   Reply With Quote
neardc's Avatar

neardc What year is it again?

Volunteer Community Leader

Join Date: Jun 2008

Posts: 5,474

See profile

Where in the world are you getting the idea that you would have to buy two houses and support two households? (Nobody here is even remotely suggesting that -- and that is certainly not what child support is for, or could even do).

Or, that the alternative to not having children is having to support a faithless ex-wife in idle luxury? These thought patterns seem so completely illogical to me. They certainly aren't based on factual data (hmmm....although it does make me wonder about your past experiences with abandonment...).

Last edited by neardc; November 5th, 2009 at 06:16 pm.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:13 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#123   Reply With Quote
D_Lion's Avatar

D_Lion - Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 14,318

See profile

chawks64 wrote :
Your only concern was that your ex not be rewarded for leaving.

No, my equal concern, in every post, is that I do not have the income to pay for two households.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:21 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#124   Reply With Quote
peg099's Avatar

peg099 has fallen and he landed beside me :)

Sage

Join Date: Sep 2008

Posts: 11,946

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
I've tried too many times already.

I am unable to afford two houses. I am unable to afford housing, utilities, et.al., for another household. I checked my paycheck and it's just as true now as it was five minutes ago.

There are no circumstance in which buying a life of idle luxury for an ex-partner fits to my income. Her idleness means my homelessness. I do not accept any argument that that is a just outcome for any reason - let alone her abondoning me.
Wow, so accepting child support automatically means the woman is going to be living in luxury? I think you better check your facts. Women fare worse economically than men do post-divorce.

And who says she will be idle? We're talking about child support, not alimony. That means she's still supporting herself. And, in most cases, even when they receive child support the cutodial parent continues to contribute to the raising of the child, both financially and through providing care for that child.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:25 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#125   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

chawks64's Avatar

chawks64 is trying very hard to be patient. Definitely not my best talent.

Power Poster

Join Date: Jun 2008

Posts: 5,216

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
No, my equal concern, in every post, is that I do not have the income to pay for two households.
And so you would expect the kids to not eat so you could make your car payment?

It's not their fault and it shouldn't be their punishment.

The point you're missing is that this is not money for the an abandoning spouse, it's money that would have been used to pay for the kids' expenses. You would have been paying it whether they were living with both parents, with you, or with your ex.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:26 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#126   Reply With Quote
cardguy's Avatar

Enthusiast

Join Date: Aug 2009

Posts: 784

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
I've tried too many times already.

I am unable to afford two houses. I am unable to afford housing, utilities, et.al., for another household. I checked my paycheck and it's just as true now as it was five minutes ago.

There are no circumstance in which buying a life of idle luxury for an ex-partner fits to my income. Her idleness means my homelessness. I do not accept any argument that that is a just outcome for any reason - let alone her abondoning me.
Who said anything about a life of idle luxury? We're talking about child support...merely making sure that if $X are needed to raise a child, then $(X/2) are being contributed by either partner.

As has already been pointed out, that's the theory anyway, in reality whomever has majority custody of the kids usually ends up bearing more than half the financial cost of raising the child anyway. Marrying someone, divorcing them, getting custody of the kids, and getting child support is a losing proposition as far as wealth acquisition is concerned. Your repeated statements about "paying for two households" are a straw man argument, no one is suggesting that.

Your attempts to paint this in such unrealistically stark terms....well, they certainly aren't the result and a dispassionate analysis from data.

Last edited by cardguy; November 5th, 2009 at 06:32 pm.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:27 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#127   Reply With Quote
peg099's Avatar

peg099 has fallen and he landed beside me :)

Sage

Join Date: Sep 2008

Posts: 11,946

See profile

D_Lion wrote :
No, my equal concern, in every post, is that I do not have the income to pay for two households.
You would only be paying for two households if you had children with someone who has never worked and never plans on working. Since one of your dating criteria is economic parity, you will never be in that situation. You would simply go back to having separate housing costs as you did prior to co-habitation. The only difference would be that you'd be splitting the cost of raising any child(ren) you had together.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:29 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#128   Reply With Quote
D_Lion's Avatar

D_Lion - Ladies want to wring my neck - you have been warned!

Sage

Join Date: Aug 2008

Posts: 14,318

See profile

neardc wrote :
Where in the world are you getting the idea that you would have to buy two houses and support two households? (Nobody here is even remotely suggesting that -- and that is certainly not what child support is for, or could even do).

Paying thousands of dollars per month to an ex-partner, nonimally as "child support," is in fact paying for her house. (Usually his house, while he is left depending on daddy or living in inappropriate, sub-standard housing.)

Since I do not have anybody to subsidize me, I would be homeless if any portion of my pay were taken. I consider this unjust.

Further, I continue to maintain that transfers should not take place to an ex-partner.

***

This thread has really made me mad. I work hard, for very little; all of it is needed for my own, tenuous, survival. There is nothing left - let alone the majority of it - for paying an idle woman!

***

Everyone who has attacked me, you have added to my conclusion, not undermined it.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:31 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#129   Reply With Quote
peg099's Avatar

peg099 has fallen and he landed beside me :)

Sage

Join Date: Sep 2008

Posts: 11,946

See profile

chawks64 wrote :
The point you're missing is that this is not money for the an abandoning spouse, it's money that would have been used to pay for the kids' expenses. You would have been paying it whether they were living with both parents, with you, or with your ex.
Actually, the point he's missing is that children are human beings and not possessions. The way he sees it, if his ex gets the porsche, he feels he shouldn't be responsible for the gas and maintenance of the vehicle he doesn't get to drive because they are no longer living together.
- November 5th, 2009, 06:33 pm
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Share on Facebook

#130   Reply With Quote

ADVERTISEMENT

Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Shall I call, email, or not? funnyengineergal Dating 65 October 6th, 2009 09:56 pm
To Call or Not to Call islandrain80 Dating 9 September 15th, 2009 03:38 pm
Secure call is worthless to buy passat1 Using eHarmony 0 August 16th, 2009 11:44 am

Latest on our Dating Advice Discussion Boards

“I think my 2nd level question would be "What kind of food do you like" LOL. Ya gotta take 'em down a notch...plenty of time to ask the harder questions later!” – PY_2

Join the “Are these questions odd” discussion

“ Hey Golden... I'm going to take a different view point than most here. I respect their positiveness, and I may be a bit cynical, but I'm also pragmatic. I have general guidelines with these ... ” – 123noname789

Join the “Close or leave open?” discussion

“I don't imagine that I will be using condoms as birth control when I am in a committed relationship. Until then, use condoms. You could make like a Catholic and pull out. I don't recommend this ... ” – LizziePooh

Join the “argued about birth control methods” discussion

“ What would "do you want to do a movie tonight mean" ?????” – ami1uwant

Join the “What lessons have you learned from online dating?” discussion

“I met a guy who is very nice... and we fell in love...have a relationship called BF and GF. Everything was good... One day early morning I called him, a woman picked up the phone...I was scared and ... ” – hycpt

Join the “is it normal? or traditional american culture?” discussion

“I think demanding a man text you is wrong, especially demanding a miss you text from someone you have been on one date with. Him making vague plans about Saturday and then not calling you to let you ... ” – LizziePooh

Join the “Did I screw it up? Am I asking for too much?” discussion

“Dang you women, I even had to Google what Tradda Lee was!” – PY_2

Join the “Did I make a mistake?” discussion



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:25 pm.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.3.0