|
|
Statistically, only 10% of the people in this country lack healthcare.
So that means 90% of us are covered.
Not bad, eh.
If you're not covered, there are already low-cost options, or you can find a job that offers healthcare coverage. Badabing.
I just find it baffling that the left wants healthcare so bad, that they're willing to stake both Clinton's and Obama's presidencies on the matter.
Really, who cares?
Regulation? That doesn't work. There are always means to get around regulation.
What you need is competition. That works. Allow a Georgia insurance agency to cover Texans, and you'll see prices drop dramatically.
What you need is to protect our doctors from plaintiff lawyers. Reduce the lawsuit abuse, and you'll see a large percentage of your costs removed.
Or, even better, do away with insurance entirely. If you cannot afford treatment, you don't get treatment. Hell, it's not a ~right~ that's guaranteed to anyone who can cross our border.
The bottomest bottom-line end-of-the-line be-all problem is that people are demanding treatment they cannot afford, and suing doctors for money they don't have, and we're running out of other people's money.
And now we have an entire party dedicated to tapping into our Federal Reserve to keep doling out other people's money for things someone else cannot afford, and it just baffles me: Why?
Votes? Is that all there is to this? Get more votes?
What is the bottomest motivation for the liberals? Why do they want to do this so very, very, very very badly?
- Saul
|